Cited by 351Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Social and monetary reward learning engage overlapping neural substrates

Open access
Lin, Alice, Adolphs, Ralph, Rangel, Antonio·2012·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

Learning to make choices that yield rewarding outcomes requires the computation of three distinct signals: stimulus values that are used to guide choices at the time of decision making, experienced utility signals that are used to evaluate the outcomes of those decisions and prediction errors that are used to update the values assigned to stimuli during reward learning. Here we investigated whether monetary and social rewards involve overlapping neural substrates during these computations. Subjects engaged in two probabilistic reward learning tasks that were identical except that rewards were either social (pictures of smiling or angry people) or monetary (gaining or losing money). We found substantial overlap between the two types of rewards for all components of the learning process: a common area of ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) correlated with stimulus value at the time of choice and another common area of vmPFC correlated with reward magnitude and common areas in the striatum correlated with prediction errors. Taken together, the findings support the hypothesis that shared anatomical substrates are involved in the computation of both monetary and social rewards.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nsr006

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The observation of social stimuli in general (e.g., smiling faces) increases activity in medial prefrontal cortex and striatum in cases where the social stimuli have a high value.

    “The observation of social stimuli in general (e.g., smiling faces) increases activity in medial prefrontal cortex 33, 34 and striatum in cases where the social stimuli have a high value (e.g., participants will exert effort or pay to view an attractive face) 35–38.”
  • The pattern of striatal activity while learning from social information resembles the reward prediction error learning signal exhibited in the striatum while learning from monetary or food rewards.

    “This pattern of striatal activity while learning from social information resembles the reward prediction error learning signal exhibited in the striatum while learning from monetary or food rewards 38, 66, 67.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, A., Adolphs, R., & Rangel, A.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2011-03-22
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
274-281
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2157381246
Cited by
351
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 16
FWCI
13.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  • National Institute on Aging (R21AG038866)
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
reward learning, social reward, monetary rewards, stimulus value, prediction error, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, striatum, probabilistic choice, reward magnitude, neural correlates, decision-making
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Choice Behavior, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Oxygen, Photic Stimulation, Reward, Social Behavior, Statistics as Topic, Time Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review