Cited by 92Memory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFace Recognition and Perception

Response characteristics of basolateral and centromedial neurons in the primate amygdala

Open access
Mosher, Clayton P., Zimmerman, Prisca E., Gothard, Katalin M.·2010·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Based on cellular architecture and connectivity, the main nuclei of the primate amygdala are divided in two clusters: basolateral (BL) and centromedial (CM). These anatomical features suggest a functional division of labor among the nuclei. The BL nuclei are thought to be involved primarily in evaluating the emotional significance or context-dependent relevance of all stimuli, including social signals such as facial expressions. The CM nuclei appear to be involved in allocating attention to stimuli of high significance and in initiating situation-appropriate autonomic responses. The goal of this study was to determine how this division of labor manifests in the response properties of neurons recorded from these two nuclear groups. We recorded the activity of 454 single neurons from identified nuclear sites in three monkeys trained to perform an image-viewing task. The task required orienting and attending to cues that predicted trial progression and viewing images with broadly varying emotional content. The two populations of neurons showed large overlaps in neurophysiological properties. We found, however, that CM neurons show higher firing and less regular spiking patterns than BL neurons. Furthermore, neurons in the CM nuclei were more likely to respond to task events (fixation, image on, image off), whereas neurons in the BL nuclei were more likely to respond selectively to the content of stimulus images. The overlap in the physiological properties of the CM and BL neurons suggest distributed processing across the nuclear groups. The differences, therefore, appear to be a processing bias rather than a hallmark of mutually exclusive functions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3225-10.2010

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Selectivity for the content of images in amygdala neurons is expressed by changes in the polarity of the response, the magnitude of the response, and the temporal pattern of the response.

    “We have previously shown that selectivity for the content of the images is expressed by changes in (1) the polarity of the response, i.e., inhibitory or excitatory, (2) the magnitude of the response, and (3) the temporal pattern of the response (e.g., bursting, phasic, or tonic changes in firing rate) (see Figure 2, in [25]).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Amaral DG Price JL Pitkanen A Carmichael ST Aggleton JP 1992 Anatomical organization of the primate amygdaloid complex The amygdala:Neurobiological aspects of emotion, Memory, and Mental Dysfunction 1 66 New York Wiley-Liss, INC
  2. McDonald AJ Aggleton JP 1992 Cell types and intrinsic connections of the amygdala The Amygdala 67 96 New York Wiley-Liss

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mosher, C. P., Zimmerman, P. E., & Gothard, K. M.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Gothard, Katalin M.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2010-12-01
Volume
30
Issue
48
Pages
16197-16207
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2166231390
Cited by
92
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 13
FWCI
3.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (#52005889)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 070836, R01MH070836)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
amygdala, basolateral amygdala, centromedial amygdala, single-unit recording, neuronal response properties, firing rate, emotional content, stimulus selectivity, attention, distributed computing
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Macaca mulatta, Male, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Primates, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review