Cited by 26Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain functionGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

In Vivo Synaptic Scaling Is Mediated by GluA2-Lacking AMPA Receptors in the Embryonic Spinal Cord

Open access
Garcia-Bereguiain, Miguel Angel, Gonzalez-Islas, Carlos, Lindsly, Casie, Butler, Ellie, Hill, Atlantis Wilkins, Wenner, Peter·2013·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

When spiking activity within a network is perturbed for hours to days, compensatory changes in synaptic strength are triggered that are thought to be important for the homeostatic maintenance of network or cellular spiking activity. In one form of this homeostatic plasticity, called synaptic scaling, all of a cell's AMPAergic miniature postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs) are increased or decreased by some scaling factor. Although synaptic scaling has been observed in a variety of systems, the mechanisms that underlie AMPAergic scaling have been controversial. Certain studies find that synaptic scaling is mediated by GluA2-lacking calcium receptors (CP-AMPARs), whereas others have found that scaling is mediated by GluA2-containing calcium-impermeable receptors (CI-AMPARs). Spontaneous network activity is observed in most developing circuits, and in the spinal cord this activity drives embryonic movements. Blocking spontaneous network activity in the chick embryo by infusing lidocaine in vivo triggers synaptic scaling in spinal motoneurons; here we show that AMPAergic scaling occurs through increases in mEPSC conductance that appear to be mediated by the insertion of GluA2-lacking AMPA receptors at the expense of GluA2-containing receptors. We have previously reported that in vivo blockade of GABAA transmission, at a developmental stage when GABA is excitatory, also triggered AMPAergic synaptic scaling. Here, we show that this form of AMPAergic scaling is also mediated by CP-AMPARs. These findings suggest that AMPAergic scaling triggered by blocking spiking activity or GABAA receptor transmission represents similar phenomena, supporting the idea that activity blockade triggers scaling by reducing GABAA transmission.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.4025-12.2013

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presence of these receptors changes the rules for the induction of plasticity and mediates in vivo synaptic scaling.

    “Furthermore, the presence of these receptors changes the rules for the induction of plasticity (Mameli et al., 2011) and mediates in vivo synaptic scaling (Garcia-Bereguiain et al., 2013).”

    From Oxytocin neurons mediate the effect of social isolation via the VTA circuits (2022) · cites this paper as Garcia-Bereguiain et al., 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Vitureira N Letellier M Goda Y 2012 Homeostatic synaptic plasticity: from single synapses to neural circuits Curr Opin Neurobiol 22 516 521 21983330 PMC3378479

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garcia-Bereguiain, M. A., Gonzalez-Islas, C., Lindsly, C., Butler, E., Hill, A. W., & Wenner, P.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2013-04-17
Volume
33
Issue
16
Pages
6791-6799
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2004035019
Cited by
26
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • Journal of Neuroscience Nursing
Funders
  • Whitehall Foundation
  • Craig H. Neilsen Foundation
  • Fundación Rafael del Pino
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS065992)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
synaptic scaling, homeostatic plasticity, miniature postsynaptic currents, spinal motoneurons, embryonic spinal cord, spontaneous network activity, lidocaine, chick embryo, AMPA receptor subunit composition
MeSH terms
Anesthetics, Local, Animals, Biophysics, Chick Embryo, Electric Stimulation, Lidocaine, Motor Neurons, Pyridazines, Spinal Cord, Synapses, Tetrodotoxin, Receptors, AMPA, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, GABA Antagonists, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review