Cited by 110Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchAction Observation and SynchronizationPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Autonomic and brain responses associated with empathy deficits in autism spectrum disorder

Open access
Gu, Xiaosi, Eilam‐Stock, Tehila, Zhou, Thomas, Anagnostou, Evdokia, Kolevzon, Alexander, Soorya, Latha, Hof, Patrick R., Friston, Karl J. +1 more·2015·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Accumulating evidence suggests that autonomic signals and their cortical representations are closely linked to emotional processes, and that related abnormalities could lead to social deficits. Although socio‐emotional impairments are a defining feature of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), empirical evidence directly supporting the link between autonomic, cortical, and socio‐emotional abnormalities in ASD is still lacking. In this study, we examined autonomic arousal indexed by skin conductance responses (SCR), concurrent cortical responses measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging, and effective brain connectivity estimated by dynamic causal modeling in seventeen unmedicated high‐functioning adults with ASD and seventeen matched controls while they performed an empathy‐for‐pain task. Compared to controls, adults with ASD showed enhanced SCR related to empathetic pain, along with increased neural activity in the anterior insular cortex, although their behavioral empathetic pain discriminability was reduced and overall SCR was decreased. ASD individuals also showed enhanced correlation between SCR and neural activities in the anterior insular cortex. Importantly, significant group differences in effective brain connectivity were limited to greater reduction in the negative intrinsic connectivity of the anterior insular cortex in the ASD group, indicating a failure in attenuating anterior insular responses to empathetic pain. These results suggest that aberrant interoceptive precision, as indexed by abnormalities in autonomic activity and its central representations, may underlie empathy deficits in ASD. Hum Brain Mapp 36:3323–3338, 2015. © 2015 The Authors Human Brain Mapping Published byWiley Periodicals, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.22840

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In high-functioning adults with ASD during an empathy for pain task, DCM found greater disinhibition in the anterior insula compared to a control group.

    “They found a greater disinhibition in the anterior insula in a group of high-functioning adults with ASD compared to a control group.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gu, X., Eilam‐Stock, T., Zhou, T., Anagnostou, E., Kolevzon, A., Soorya, L., Hof, P. R., Friston, K. J., & Fan, J.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
  • Queens College, CUNY (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Rush University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Gu, Xiaosi
  • Fan, Jin
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-05-21
Volume
36
Issue
9
Pages
3323-3338
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W1495061807
Cited by
110
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Health [NIH] (R21 MH083164)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation Grant (22002078)
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Wellcome Trust Principal Award (Dr. Read Montague)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, empathy deficits, skin conductance response, autonomic arousal, anterior insula, interoception, effective brain connectivity, dynamic causal modeling, high-functioning adults
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adult, Bayes Theorem, Brain, Brain Mapping, Discrimination, Psychological, Empathy, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Neurological, Neural Pathways, Neuropsychological Tests, Pain, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review