Cited by 75Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMotor Control and Adaptation

Functional Connectivity of the Striatum Links Motivation to Action Control in Humans

Open access
Harsay, H. A., Cohen, M. X., Oosterhof, N. N., Forstmann, B. U., Mars, R. B., Ridderinkhof, K. R.·2011·Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Motivation improves the efficiency of intentional behavior, but how this performance modulation is instantiated in the human brain remains unclear. We used a reward-cued antisaccade paradigm to investigate how motivational goals (the expectation of a reward for good performance) modulate patterns of neural activation and functional connectivity to improve preparation for antisaccade performance. Behaviorally, subjects performed better (faster and more accurate antisaccades) when they knew they would be rewarded for good performance. Reward anticipation was associated with increased activation in the ventral and dorsal striatum, and cortical oculomotor regions. Functional connectivity between the caudate nucleus and cortical oculomotor control structures predicted individual differences in the behavioral benefit of reward anticipation. We conclude that although both dorsal and ventral striatal circuitry are involved in the anticipation of reward, only the dorsal striatum and its connected cortical network is involved in the direct modulation of oculomotor behavior by motivational incentive.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.5415-10.2011

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Networks associated with attention and dopamine release were largely segregated during control trials but less segregated during reward trials.

    “they showed that while those networks were largely segregated during control trials (i.e., they exhibited high within-network connectivity), there was less segregation (i.e., higher between-network connectivity) during reward trials (Harsay et al., 2011; Kinnison, Padmala, Choi, & Pessoa, 2012).”

    From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Harsay et al., 2011

    The ‘Functional connectivity between striatal and cortical regions’ section (page not provided) reports higher connectivity between the caudate and oculomotor-control regions during reward anticipation than during no-reward anticipation. It does not report high within-network connectivity or establish that attention and dopamine-release networks were largely segregated during control trials; dopamine release was not measured. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harsay, H. A., Cohen, M. X., Oosterhof, N. N., Forstmann, B. U., Mars, R. B., & Ridderinkhof, K. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Bangor University (GB)
  • Spinoza Centre for Neuroimaging (NL)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Ridderinkhof, K. R.
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2011-07-20
Volume
31
Issue
29
Pages
10701-10711
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2107219405
Cited by
75
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
motivation, reward anticipation, functional connectivity, striatum, dorsal striatum, ventral striatum, caudate nucleus, antisaccade task, oculomotor control, action control, individual differences
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Attention, Basal Ganglia, Brain Mapping, Caudate Nucleus, Cues, Eye Movements, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motivation, Neural Pathways, Oxygen, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Reward, Serial Learning, Time Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review