Cited by 157Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesSchizophrenia research and treatment

Striatal dopamine mediates the interface between motivational and cognitive control in humans: evidence from genetic imaging.

Open access
Aarts, Esther, Roelofs, Ardi, Franke, Barbara, Rijpkema, Mark, Fernández, Guillén, Helmich, Rick C, Cools, Roshan·2010·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Dopamine has been hypothesized to provide the basis for the interaction between motivational and cognitive control. However, there is no evidence for this hypothesis in humans. We fill this gap by using fMRI, a novel behavioral paradigm and a common polymorphism in the DAT1 gene (SLC6A3). Carriers of the 9-repeat (9R) allele of a 40 base pair repeat polymorphism in the 3' untranslated region of DAT1, associated with high striatal dopamine, showed greater activity in the ventromedial striatum during reward anticipation than homozygotes for the 10-repeat allele, replicating previous genetic imaging studies. The crucial novel finding is that 9R carriers also exhibited a greater influence of anticipated reward on switch costs, as well as greater activity in the dorsomedial striatum during task switching in anticipation of high reward relative to low reward. These data establish a crucial role for human striatal dopamine in the modulation of cognitive flexibility by reward anticipation, thus, elucidating the neurochemical mechanism of the interaction between motivation and cognitive control.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/npp.2010.68

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Drastic reduction of midbrain dopamine (in for instance Parkinson's disease) renders the patient passive and unresponsive, and peaks in dopamine by contrast reflect enhanced motivation or craving.

    “Drastic reduction of midbrain dopamine (in for instance Parkinson’s disease) renders the patient passive and unresponsive, and peaks in dopamine by contrast reflect enhanced motivation (e.g., Cools et al., 2010; Aarts et al., 2012) or craving (Lewis, 2011).”

    From Impulsive action: emotional impulses and their control (2014) · cites this paper as Aarts et al., 2012

    The Introduction links mesolimbic dopamine to reward and motivation, and the Discussion reports that dopamine-related genetic variation affected responses during reward anticipation. But the study did not measure dopamine peaks or show that such peaks reflect enhanced motivation. The Parkinson’s disease and craving clauses are not attached to this citation. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This finding confirms previous evidence that genetic variation in DAT1 modulates striatal reward-related activation.

    “This finding confirms previous evidence from healthy volunteers that genetic variation in DAT1 modulates striatal reward-related activation.26,49,50”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aarts, E., Roelofs, A., Franke, B., Rijpkema, M., Fernández, G., Helmich, R. C., & Cools, R.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Aarts, Esther
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2010-05-12
Volume
35
Issue
9
Pages
1943-1951
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W2107867628
Cited by
157
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 13
FWCI
6.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
striatal dopamine, motivation, cognitive control, DAT1 gene, dopamine transporter, 3' untranslated region polymorphism, reward anticipation, task switching, switch costs, cognitive flexibility, ventromedial striatum, dorsomedial striatum
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Corpus Striatum, Dopamine, Female, Genotype, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motivation, Oxygen, Polymorphism, Genetic, Reward, Microsatellite Repeats, Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review