CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 173

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

FE65 Constitutes the Functional Link between the Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein and the Amyloid Precursor Protein

Pietrzik, Claus U., Yoon, Il-Sang, Jaeger, Sebastian, Busse, Tracy, Weggen, Sascha, Koo, Edward H.·2004·The Journal of Neuroscience
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.5451-03.2004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Increasing evidence has implicated the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) and the adaptor protein FE65 in Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis. We have shown previously that LRP mediates β-amyloid precursor protein (APP) processing and affects amyloid β-protein and APP secretion and APP-c-terminal fragment generation. Furthermore, LRP mediates APP processing through its intracellular domain. Here, we set out to examine whether this interaction is of direct or indirect nature. Specifically, we asked whether adaptor proteins such as FE65 influence the LRP-mediated effect on APP processing by forming a protein complex. In coimmunoprecipitation experiments, we confirmed the postulated APP-FE65 and the LRP-FE65 interaction. However, we also showed an LRP-FE65-APP trimeric complex using pull-down techniques. Because FE65 alters APP processing, we investigated whether this effect is LRP dependent. Indeed, FE65 was only able to increase APP secretion in the presence of LRP. In the absence of LRP, APP secretion was unchanged compared with the LRP knock-out phenotype. Using RNA short interference techniques against FE65, we demonstrated that a reduction in FE65 protein mimics the LRP knock-out phenotype on APP processing. These results clearly demonstrate that FE65 acts as a functional linker between APP and LRP.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.5451-03.2004

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. 10.1074/jbc.M104059200 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00809-7 · DOI
  3. 10.1126/science.1058783 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1074/jbc.M309561200 · DOI
  5. 2000, J Cell Sci, 113, 1857, 10.1242/jcs.113.11.1857 · DOI
  6. 10.1083/jcb.129.6.1533 · DOI
  7. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1999.0730985.x · DOI
  8. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.01009.x · DOI
  9. 10.1172/JCI200113992 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 1990, J Biol Chem, 265, 21355, 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)45368-3 · DOI
  11. 10.1074/jbc.C100447200 · DOI
  12. 10.1074/jbc.M306403200 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 2001, J Neurosci, 21, 8354, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-21-08354.2001 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 1996, J Cell Sci, 109, 991, 10.1242/jcs.109.5.991 · DOI
  15. 1997, J Neurosci, 17, 140, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-01-00140.1997 · DOI
  16. 10.1126/science.1065412 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S0169-328X(01)00006-7 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)00941-7 · DOI
  19. 10.1074/jbc.274.12.7952 · DOI
  20. 1993, J Neurosci, 13, 3136, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-07-03136.1993 · DOI
  21. 10.1042/BJ20020562 · DOI
  22. 10.1074/jbc.273.50.33556 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1074/jbc.275.10.7410 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1074/jbc.M304824200 · DOI
  25. 1996, Biochem J, 313, 71, 10.1042/bj3130071 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pietrzik, C. U., Yoon, I.-S., Jaeger, S., Busse, T., Weggen, S., & Koo, E. H.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Society for Neuroscience
Published
2004-04-28
Volume
24
Issue
17
Pages
4259-4265
ISSN
  • 0270-6474
  • 1529-2401
DOI
10.1523/jneurosci.5451-03.2004
Cited by
173
References
2
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (vor, 183 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review