Cited by 84Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorRegulation of Appetite and ObesityEating Disorders and Behaviors

Genetically Determined Differences in Brain Response to a Primary Food Reward: Figure 1.

Open access
Felsted, Jennifer A., Ren, Xueying, Chouinard-Decorte, Francois, Small, Dana M.·2010·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Combining genetic and neuroimaging techniques may elucidate the biological underpinnings of individual differences in neurophysiology and potential vulnerabilities to disease. The TaqIA A1 variant is associated with diminished dopamine D 2 receptor density, higher body mass, and food reinforcement. It also moderates the relationship between brain response to food and future weight gain. This suggests that the polymorphism is associated with a fundamental difference in the neurophysiology of food that may predispose toward overeating. An alternative possibility is that factors, such as impulsivity, eating style, reward drive, and perception, which may covary with the polymorphism, influence reward coding and eating behavior. To distinguish between these alternatives, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure neural response to the ingestion of palatable and caloric milkshakes in healthy subjects with (A1+;n= 13) and without (A1−;n= 13) the TaqIA A1 allele. The groups were selected from a larger group to be matched for linked individual factors such as age, gender, education, body mass index, impulsivity, eating style, and perceptual responses to the milkshake. We demonstrate an interaction between genotype (A1+ vs A1−) and stimulus (milkshake vs a tasteless/odorless baseline) in the midbrain, thalamus, and orbital frontal cortex; whereas A1− shows increased responses to milkshake, A1+ shows decreased responses to milkshake relative to baseline. This interaction occurs despite similar ratings of milkshake pleasantness, intensity, and familiarity. We therefore conclude that there is a specific association between the TaqIA A1 polymorphism and brain response during ingestion of a palatable food.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.5483-09.2010

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Comparing lean and obese subjects carrying different alleles of either the dopamine D2-receptor or μ-opioid receptor genes reveals differences in behavioral and neural responses to palatable food.

    “Comparing lean and obese subjects carrying different alleles of either the dopamine D2-receptor or μ-opioid receptor genes does reveal differences in behavioral and neural responses to palatable food ([39](#B39), [40](#B40), [60](#B60), [172](#B172)).”

    From Food reward, hyperphagia, and obesity (2011) · cites this paper as [60]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Felsted, J. A., Ren, X., Chouinard-Decorte, F., & Small, D. M.
Affiliations
  • John B. Pierce Laboratory (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Small, Dana M.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2010-02-17
Volume
30
Issue
7
Pages
2428-2432
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2058553084
Cited by
84
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 15
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R03DA022292)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
dopamine D2 receptor, food reward, milkshakes, individual differences, genetic association, midbrain, thalamus, orbitofrontal cortex, dietary habits, overeating, impulsivity, eating styles, reward coding
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Brain, Brain Mapping, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Food Preferences, Gene Frequency, Genotype, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Oxygen, Personality Inventory, Polymorphism, Genetic, Reward, Taste, Body Mass Index, Receptors, Dopamine D2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review