Genetically Determined Differences in Brain Response to a Primary Food Reward: Figure 1.
Open accessAbstract
Combining genetic and neuroimaging techniques may elucidate the biological underpinnings of individual differences in neurophysiology and potential vulnerabilities to disease. The TaqIA A1 variant is associated with diminished dopamine D 2 receptor density, higher body mass, and food reinforcement. It also moderates the relationship between brain response to food and future weight gain. This suggests that the polymorphism is associated with a fundamental difference in the neurophysiology of food that may predispose toward overeating. An alternative possibility is that factors, such as impulsivity, eating style, reward drive, and perception, which may covary with the polymorphism, influence reward coding and eating behavior. To distinguish between these alternatives, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure neural response to the ingestion of palatable and caloric milkshakes in healthy subjects with (A1+;n= 13) and without (A1−;n= 13) the TaqIA A1 allele. The groups were selected from a larger group to be matched for linked individual factors such as age, gender, education, body mass index, impulsivity, eating style, and perceptual responses to the milkshake. We demonstrate an interaction between genotype (A1+ vs A1−) and stimulus (milkshake vs a tasteless/odorless baseline) in the midbrain, thalamus, and orbital frontal cortex; whereas A1− shows increased responses to milkshake, A1+ shows decreased responses to milkshake relative to baseline. This interaction occurs despite similar ratings of milkshake pleasantness, intensity, and familiarity. We therefore conclude that there is a specific association between the TaqIA A1 polymorphism and brain response during ingestion of a palatable food.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Comparing lean and obese subjects carrying different alleles of either the dopamine D2-receptor or μ-opioid receptor genes reveals differences in behavioral and neural responses to palatable food.
“Comparing lean and obese subjects carrying different alleles of either the dopamine D2-receptor or μ-opioid receptor genes does reveal differences in behavioral and neural responses to palatable food ([39](#B39), [40](#B40), [60](#B60), [172](#B172)).”
From Food reward, hyperphagia, and obesity (2011) · cites this paper as [60]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
A neural substrate of prediction and reward
Schultz, W., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5306.1593 · Cited by 9,388 · see citing works
Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319 · Cited by 7,306 · see citing works
Maldjian, J., Laurienti, P., Kraft, R., & Burdette, J. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00169-1 · Cited by 5,453 · see citing works
The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger
Stunkard, A. J., & Messick, S. (1985) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(85)90010-8 · Cited by 4,687 · see citing works
The assessment of binge eating severity among obese persons
Gormally, J., Black, S., Daston, S., & Rardin, D. (1982) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/0306-4603(82)90024-7 · Cited by 2,129 · see citing works
Changes in brain activity related to eating chocolate: From pleasure to aversion
Small, D. M. (2001) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/124.9.1720 · Cited by 1,179 · cited 4× · see citing works
“source and target regions that are also known to play a role in food reward, including the midbrain, striatum, thalamus, OFC, insula, and amygdala (Small et al., 2001; Sánchez-González et al., 2005; GarcíaCabezas et al., 2007, 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationTHE TRIDIMENSIONAL PERSONALITY QUESTIONNAIRE: U.S. NORMATIVE DATA
Cloninger, C. R., Przybeck, T. R., & Švrakić, D. M. (1991) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1991.69.3.1047 · Cited by 1,034 · see citing works
Overlapping neuronal circuits in addiction and obesity: evidence of systems pathology
Volkow, N. D., Wang, G.-J., Fowler, J. S., & Telang, F. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0107 · Cited by 809 · see citing works
Stice, E., Spoor, S., Bohon, C., & Small, D. M. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1161550 · Cited by 786 · see citing works
Self-citationEvaluating the ‘Labeled Magnitude Scale’ for Measuring Sensations of Taste and Smell
Green, B. G., Dalton, P., Cowart, B. J., Shaffer, G. S., Rankin, K., & Higgins, J. L. (1996) · Chemical Senses · doi:10.1093/chemse/21.3.323 · Cited by 752 · see citing works
Jönsson, E. G., Nöthen, M. M., Grünhage, F., Farde, L., Nakashima, Y., Propping, P., & Sedvall, G. C. (1999) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4000532 · Cited by 721 · see citing works
Noble, E. P. (1991) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1991.01810310066012 · Cited by 655 · see citing works
Neville, M. J., Johnstone, E. C., & Walton, R. T. (2004) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.20039 · Cited by 622 · see citing works
Reward deficiency syndrome: genetic aspects of behavioral disorders
Comings, D. E., & Blum, K. (2000) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(00)26022-6 · Cited by 621 · see citing works
The power of food scale. A new measure of the psychological influence of the food environment
Lowe, M. R., Butryn, M. L., Didie, E. R., Annunziato, R. A., Thomas, J. G., Crerand, C. E., Ochner, C. N., Coletta, M. C., Bellace, D., Wallaert, M., et al. (2009) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2009.05.016 · Cited by 548 · see citing works
Genetically Determined Differences in Learning from Errors
Klein, T. A., Neumann, J., Reuter, M., Hennig, J., von Cramon, D. Y., & Ullsperger, M. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1145044 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
A method for removal of global effects from fMRI time series
Macey, P. M., Macey, K. E., Kumar, R., & Harper, R. M. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.042 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Organization of the nigrothalamocortical system in the rhesus monkey
Ilinsky, I. A., Jouandet, M. L., & Goldman‐Rakic, P. S. (1985) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.902360304 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Epstein, L. H., Temple, J. L., Neaderhiser, B. J., Salis, R. J., Erbe, R. W., & Leddy, J. J. (2007) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.121.5.877 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
The Primate Thalamus Is a Key Target for Brain Dopamine
García‐Cabezas, M. Á., García‐Cabezas, M. Á., Rico, B., & Cavada, C. (2005) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0968-05.2005 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Veldhuizen, M. G., Bender, G., Constable, R. T., & Small, D. M. (2007) · Chemical Senses · doi:10.1093/chemse/bjm025 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Self-citationSeparable Substrates for Anticipatory and Consummatory Food Chemosensation
Small, D. M., Veldhuizen, M. G., Felsted, J. A., Mak, Y. E., & McGlone, F. P. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.021 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Self-citationTHE TRIDIMENSIONAL PERSONALITY QUESTIONNAIRE: U.S. NORMATIVE DATA
Cloninger, C. R. (1991) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.69.7.1047-1057 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Distribution of the dopamine innervation in the macaque and human thalamus
García‐Cabezas, M. Á., Rico, B., García‐Cabezas, M. Á., & Cavada, C. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.07.032 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Dopamine Innervation in the Thalamus: Monkey versus Rat
García‐Cabezas, M. Á., Martínez‐Sánchez, P., Sánchez-González, M. Á., Garzón, M., & Cavada, C. (2008) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn093 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Behavioral phenotypes of impulsivity related to the ANKK1 gene are independent of an acute stressor
White, M. J., Morris, C. P., Lawford, B. R., & Young, R. (2008) · Behavioral and Brain Functions · doi:10.1186/1744-9081-4-54 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
The DRD2 TaqIA polymorphism associated with changed midbrain volumes in healthy individuals
Cerasa, A., Gioia, M. C., Tarantino, P., et al. (2009) · Genes Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1111/j.1601-183x.2009.00492.x · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Neuroimaging and Human Genetics
Winterer, G., Hariri, A. R., Goldman, D. A., & Weinberger, D. R. (2005) · International review of neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0074-7742(05)67010-9 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Dissociation, childhood trauma, and the response to fluoxetine in bulimic patients
McCarthy, M. K., GOFF, D. C., Baer, L., Cioffi, J., & Herzog, D. B. (1994) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/1098-108x(199404)15:3 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Editorial: Pragmatics and statistics in psychiatric genetics
Levinson, D. F. (1997) · American Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19970418)74:2 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale
Patton, J. H., Stanford, M. S., & Barratt, E. S. (1995) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/1097-4679(199511)51:6
van Strien (1986) · doi:10.1002/1098-108x(198602)5:2
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sescousse, G., Caldú, X., Segura, B., & Dreher, J.-C. (2013) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.02.002 · Cited by 782 · see citing works
Reward mechanisms in obesity: new insights and future directions
Kenny, P. J. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.016 · Cited by 748 · see citing works
Obesity and the brain: how convincing is the addiction model?
Ziauddeen, H., Farooqi, I. S., & Fletcher, P. C. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3212 · Cited by 462 · see citing works
Anorexia nervosa and obesity are associated with opposite brain reward response
Frank, G. K. W., Reynolds, J. R., Shott, M. E., Jappe, L., Yang, T. T., Tregellas, J. R., & O'Reilly, R. C. (2012) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2012.51 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Food reward, hyperphagia, and obesity
Berthoud, H.-R., Lenard, N. R., & Shin, A. C. (2011) · American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00028.2011 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Pursey, K. M., Stanwell, P., Callister, R. J., Brain, K., Collins, C. E., & Burrows, T. L. (2014) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2014.00007 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Alterations of the salience network in obesity: A resting‐state fMRI study
García‐García, I., Jurado, M. Á., Garolera, M., Segura, B., Sala‐Llonch, R., Marqués‐Iturria, I., Pueyo, R., Sender‐Palacios, M. J., Vernet‐Vernet, M., Narberhaus, A., et al. (2013) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22104 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Burger, K. S., & Stice, E. (2012) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.111.027003 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Acute stress potentiates brain response to milkshake as a function of body weight and chronic stress
Rudenga, K. J., Sinha, R., & Small, D. M. (2013) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/ijo.2012.39 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Felsted, J. A., Ren, X., Chouinard-Decorte, F., & Small, D. M.
- Affiliations
- John B. Pierce Laboratory (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Small, Dana M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2010-02-17
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2428-2432
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC2831082
- OpenAlex
- W2058553084
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R03DA022292)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Keywords
- dopamine D2 receptor, food reward, milkshakes, individual differences, genetic association, midbrain, thalamus, orbitofrontal cortex, dietary habits, overeating, impulsivity, eating styles, reward coding
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Brain, Brain Mapping, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Food Preferences, Gene Frequency, Genotype, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Oxygen, Personality Inventory, Polymorphism, Genetic, Reward, Taste, Body Mass Index, Receptors, Dopamine D2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review