Cited by 29Mental Health Treatment and AccessTreatment of Major DepressionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Generalizability of Clinical Trial Results for Adolescent Major Depressive Disorder

Open access
Blanco, Carlos, Hoertel, Nicolas, Franco, Silvia, Olfson, Mark, He, Jian-Ping, López, Saioa, González-Pinto, Ana, Limosin, Frédéric +1 more·2017·Pediatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although there have been a number of clinical trials evaluating treatments for adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD), the generalizability of those trials to samples of depressed adolescents who present for routine clinical care is unknown. Examining the generalizability of clinical trials of pharmacological and psychotherapy interventions for adolescent depression can help administrators and frontline practitioners determine the relevance of these studies for their patients and may also guide eligibility criteria for future clinical trials in this clinical population. METHODS: Data on nationally representative adolescents were derived from the National Comorbidity Survey: Adolescent Supplement. To assess the generalizability of adolescent clinical trials for MDD, we applied a standard set of eligibility criteria representative of clinical trials to all adolescents in the National Comorbidity Survey: Adolescent Supplement with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition diagnosis of MDD (N = 592). RESULTS: From the overall MDD sample, 61.9% would have been excluded from a typical pharmacological trial, whereas 42.2% would have been excluded from a psychotherapy trial. Among those who sought treatment (n = 412), the corresponding exclusion rates were 72.7% for a pharmacological trial and 52.2% for a psychotherapy trial. The criterion leading to the largest number of exclusions was “significant risk of suicide” in both pharmacological and psychotherapy trials. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacological and, to a lesser extent, psychotherapy clinical trials likely exclude most adolescents with MDD. Careful consideration should be given to balancing eligibility criteria and internal validity with applicability in routine clinical care while ensuring patient safety.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2016-1701

Cites

117 of 117 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [30]Almeida-Montes LG, Friederichsen A. Treatment of major depressive disorder with fluoxetine in children and adolescents. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study [in Spanish]. Psiquiatr Biologica. 2005;12:198–205 [Google Scholar]
  2. [39]Emslie GJ, Findling RL, Rynn MA, et al. Efficacy and safety of nefazadone in the treatment of adolescents with major depressive disorder [abstract]. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2002;12(4):299 [Google Scholar]
  3. [46]Klein RG, Mannuzza S, Koplewicz HS, et al. Adolescent depression: controlled desipramine treatment and atypical features. Depress Anxiety. 1998;7(1):15–31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. [62]Moldenhauer Z. Adolescent Depression: A Primary Care Pilot Intervention Study [doctoral thesis]. New York, NY: University of Rochester; 2003 [Google Scholar]
  5. [78]Phillips J. An Evaluation of School-Based Cognitive-Behavioral Social Skills Training Groups With Adolescents at Risk for Depression [doctoral thesis]. Arlington, TX: University of Texas at Arlington; 2004 [Google Scholar]
  6. [83]RTI International SUDAAN [computer program]. Version 10.0.1. SAS-Callable. Raleigh, NC: Research Triangle Institute; 2009 [Google Scholar]

Authors
Blanco, C., Hoertel, N., Franco, S., Olfson, M., He, J.-P., López, S., González-Pinto, A., Limosin, F., & Merikangas, K. R.
Affiliations
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (US)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Department of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York, New York; and
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • Genetic Epidemiology Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland;
  • Hospital Universitario de Alava (Santiago), Centre for Biomedical Research in Mental Health Network, Vitoria, Spain
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2017-12-01
Volume
140
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2766154692
Cited by
29
References
117
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH082773, R01MH076051, ZIAMH002808)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
adolescent major depressive disorder, generalizability of trial results, inclusion and exclusion criteria, exclusion rates, pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, suicide risk, routine clinical practice
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Clinical Trials as Topic, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Generalization, Psychological, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Research Design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review