The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reinventing government: how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector
Open accessAbstract
livro de David Osborne e Ted Gaebler tem causado sensação nos Estados Unidos.Figura entre os mais lidos e comentados do momen• to.A proposição de "reinventar" o governo tem ga• nhado mais e mais adeptos.Fala-se até mesmo no verbo to osbornize (Business Week, 20.01.92) em referência à aplicação da proposição do autor principal da obra, David Osborne.Mesmo o presidente Bíll Clinton, ao anuncíar o plano conhecido oficialmente como uRevi~ são de Desempenho Nacional"-destinado a reduzir a imensa burocracia federal -usou a expressão "reinvençào do governo" (Jornal US,4 1oday, traduzido pela Folha de São Paulo em 19.07.93).David Osborne é jornalista, escritor (publicou o li• vro Laboratories of democracy, escreve regularmente para o The Washingotn Past, Governing e outros) e consultor de governos (tanto republicanos quanto democra• tas, ressalva o prefácio).Ted Gaebler foi numager da cidade de Visalia, Califórnia e Vandalia, Ohio e presidente do Gaebler Group, empresa de consultoria especializada em organizações públicas.O livro Reinventig Government propõe uma rediscussão das questões de governo a partir de tendências e teorias recentes no campo da administração, utilizando conceitos formulados por "gurus" como Peter Drocker, Tom Peters, Robert Waterman, E. S. Savas, Ted Kolderie, J. Q.Wilson, Alvin Toffler e W. Edwards Deming.A discussão principia com a constatação de que houve uma mudança na concepção da palavra burocracia que, no passado, tinha um sentido positivo por conotar racionalidade, eficiência e uma forma de estrutura organizacional.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2006) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00498.x · Cited by 1,296
The Marketization of the Nonprofit Sector: Civil Society at Risk?
Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00355.x · Cited by 1,292
INNOVATION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND FUTURE RESEARCH AGENDA
DE VRIES, H., BEKKERS, V., & TUMMERS, L. (2016) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12209 · Cited by 1,214
The Effects of E‐Government on Trust and Confidence in Government
Tolbert, C. J., & Mossberger, K. (2006) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00594.x · Cited by 1,092
van Kersbergen, K., & van Waarden, F. (2004) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00149.x · Cited by 971
Pathologies of accountability: ICANN and the challenge of “multiple accountabilities disorder”
Koppell, J. G. (2005) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00434.x · Cited by 495
Sustainability of nonprofit organizations: An empirical investigation
Weerawardena, J., McDonald, R. E., & Mort, G. S. (2010) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2009.08.004 · Cited by 438
Managing Boundaries in American Administration: The Collaboration Imperative
Kettl, D. F. (2006) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00662.x · Cited by 376
Sandfort, J. R. (2000) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024289 · Cited by 320
Lubienski, C., Gulosino, C., & Weitzel, P. (2009) · American Journal of Education · doi:10.1086/599778 · Cited by 264
Getting to outcomes: a results-based approach to accountability
Wandersman, A., Imm, P., Chinman, M., & Kaftarian, S. (2000) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/s0149-7189(00)00028-8 · Cited by 192
Government Openness and Public Trust: The Mediating Role of Democratic Capacity
Schmidthuber, L., Ingrams, A., & Hilgers, D. (2021) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13298 · Cited by 180
Peters, B. G. (2010) · Public Organization Review · doi:10.1007/s11115-010-0133-4 · Cited by 164
Constructing performance measurement in the public sector
Arnaboldi, M., & Azzone, G. (2010) · Critical Perspectives on Accounting · doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2010.01.016 · Cited by 145
Lights on the shadows of public procurement: Transparency as an antidote to corruption
Bauhr, M., Czibik, Á., de Fine Licht, J., & Fazekas, M. (2020) · Governance · doi:10.1111/gove.12432 · Cited by 131
The influence of funding source and legislative requirements on government cost accounting practices
Geiger, D. R., & Ittner, C. D. (1996) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/0361-3682(96)00008-6 · Cited by 129
Sallai, D., & Schnyder, G. (2021) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650319898475 · Cited by 97
Citizen Knowledge: Markets, Experts, and the Infrastructure of Democracy
Herzog, L. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197681718.001.0001 · Cited by 80
E-Government and Corruption: A Longitudinal Analysis of Countries
Zhao, X., & Xu, H. D. (2015) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900692.2014.942736 · Cited by 79
Defining Bureaucratic Autonomy
Bersch, K., & Fukuyama, F. (2023) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051921-102914 · Cited by 58
Does E-Government Raise Effectiveness and Efficiency?: Examining the Cross-National Effect
Nam, T. (2019) · Journal of Global Information Management · doi:10.4018/jgim.2019070107 · Cited by 53
Park, Y. J., & Matkin, D. S. T. (2021) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13269 · Cited by 34
E-Government Effectiveness and Efficiency in EU-28 and COVID-19
Hodžić, S., Ravšelj, D., & Jurlina Alibegović, D. (2021) · Central European Public Administration Review · doi:10.17573/cepar.2021.1.07 · Cited by 34
Stinchcomb, J. B., & Ordaz, F. (2007) · Public Organization Review · doi:10.1007/s11115-006-0026-8 · Cited by 31
Theoretical Perspectives on Bureaucrats: A Quest for Democratic Agents
Železnik, A., & Fink-Hafner, D. (2023) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/00953997231165998 · Cited by 21
The “Management-Per-Result” Approach to International Development Project Design
Ika, L. A., & Lytvynov, V. (2011) · Project Management Journal · doi:10.1002/pmj.20248 · Cited by 20
Multi-Level Governance: Underplayed Features, Overblown Expectation and Missing Linkages
Piattoni, S. (2015) · Multi-Level Governance: The Missing Linkages · doi:10.1108/s2045-794420150000004013 · Cited by 18
Handbook of Research on Artificial Intelligence in Government Practices and Processes
(2022) · Advances in Electronic Government, Digital Divide, and Regional Development · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-9609-8 · Cited by 18
Romano, G., Marciano, C., & Minoja, M. (2023) · International Review of Administrative Sciences · doi:10.1177/00208523221077574 · Cited by 14
Listening for What Matters: Avoiding Contextual Errors in Health Care
Weiner, M., & Schwartz, P. (2023) · doi:10.1093/med/9780197588109.001.0001 · Cited by 9
von Soest, C. (2006) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.951933 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Kelnert, T. M. M., & Silva, C. D. C.
- Venue
- Revista de Administração de Empresas
- Publisher
- FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
- Published
- 1993-12
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 97-99
- ISSN
- 0034-7590 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073840323
- Cited by
- 3,317
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 174.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
