Cited by 147Muscle activation and electromyography studiesProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsTactile and Sensory Interactions

Design and evaluation of a sensory feedback system that provides grasping pressure in a myoelectric hand

Patterson, Patrick E., Katz, Judd A.·1992·The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Abstract

Providing accurate sensory information to the individual with a myoelectric limb is of great importance for improving device use in a wide variety of tasks. A number of feedback systems presently being investigated rely on either vibrotactile or electrotactile skin stimulation, which does not provide sensory patterns similar to those in a natural grasping hand. A prototype system was developed to enhance sensory information transfer by using a technique in which the feedback modality (pressure) was the same as the grasping pressure. The present study compared the developed system (pressure) with vibrotactile feedback, vision, and compounds of these three modes. It was found that the pressure-pressure concept reduced grasping pressure replication errors and error variability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1682/jrrd.1992.01.0001

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mechano-tactile stimulation may be superior to vibro-tactile substitution in that it reduces the grasping force error of prostheses, thereby providing more accurate spatial sensory information.

    “This technique may be superior to vibro-tactile substitution in that it reduces the grasping force error of prostheses, thereby providing more accurate spatial sensory information (Patterson and Katz, 1992; Antfolk et al., 2013a).”

    From Selectivity and Longevity of Peripheral-Nerve and Machine Interfaces: A Review. (2017) · cites this paper as Patterson and Katz, 1992

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patterson, P. E., & Katz, J. A.
Affiliations
Iowa State University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
Published
1992
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
1
ISSN
  • 0742-3241 (ISSN-L)
  • 0748-7711
OpenAlex
W1987158471
Cited by
147
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
myoelectric hand, sensory feedback, pressure feedback, vibrotactile feedback, electrocutaneous stimulation, prosthetic hand, sensory substitution
MeSH terms
Adult, Artificial Limbs, Biofeedback, Psychology, Hand, Humans, Male, Pressure, Sensation, Skin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review