The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CONTEXTUAL CONTROL OF DELAY DISCOUNTING BY PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLERS
Abstract
The present study demonstrated the relative impact of gambling and nongambling contexts on the degree of delay discounting by pathological gamblers. We used a delay‐discounting task with 20 pathological gamblers in and out of the natural context in which they regularly gambled. For 16 of the 20 participants, it appeared that the difference of context altered the subjective value of delayed rewards, thereby producing relative changes in delay‐discounting rates that were generally consistent with a hyperbolic model of intertemporal choice. The current data suggest that empirically derived k values from delay‐discounting tasks are context sensitive and are not constant across various settings for the individual. Implications for future transitional research on addictive disorders generally, and gambling specifically, are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Contextual influences on delay discounting rate include a gambling context among pathological gamblers (Dixon et al., 2006) and episodic future thinking in normal subjects (Peters and Buchel, 2010; Benoit et al., 2011).”
From Individual Differences in Delay Discounting Under Acute Stress: The Role of Trait Perceived Stress (2012) · cites this paper as Dixon et al., 2006
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR)
American Psychiatric Association (2000) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890423349 · Cited by 11,069
Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls.
Kirby, K. N., Petry, N. M., & Bickel, W. K. (1999) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.128.1.78 · Cited by 2,171
Madden, G. J., Petry, N. M., Badger, G. J., & Bickel, W. K. (1997) · Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1037/1064-1297.5.3.256 · Cited by 911
Pathological gambling: Etiology, comorbidity, and treatment.
Petry, N. M. (2005) · doi:10.1037/10894-000 · Cited by 659
TEMPORAL DISCOUNTING: BASIC RESEARCH AND THE ANALYSIS OF SOCIALLY IMPORTANT BEHAVIOR
Critchfield, T. S., & Kollins, S. H. (2001) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.2001.34-101 · Cited by 439
Excessive discounting of delayed rewards in substance abusers with gambling problems
Petry, N. M., & Casarella, T. (1999) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/s0376-8716(99)00010-1 · Cited by 432
Discounting of delayed health gains and losses by current, never- and ex-smokers of cigarettes
Odum, A. L., Madden, G. J., & Bickel, W. K. (2002) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1080/14622200210141257 · Cited by 234
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- 10.1007/PL00005490 · DOI · Paper page
- Bickel W. K., 2002, Reframing health behavior change with behavioral economics
- 10.1002/bin.173 · DOI
- Dixon M. R., 2003, Visual basic for behavioral psychologists
- 10.1901/jaba.2003.36-449 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00213-002-1159-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3758/BF03211314 · DOI
- Herrnstein R. J., 1992, Choice over time, 331
- 10.1006/obhd.1995.1086 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02104905 · DOI
- 10.1176/ajp.144.9.1184 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/1064-1297.7.3.284 · DOI
- Mazur J. E., 1987, Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol. 5. The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value, 55
- 10.1901/jeab.2001.76-235 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0376-8716(00)00111-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3758/BF03212959 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.9357298.x · DOI
- 10.1901/jeab.2001.76-1 · DOI
- 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-15 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-233 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/bdm.3960060202 · DOI
- 10.1901/jeab.1999.71-121 · DOI
- Vuchinich R. E., 1999, The economic analysis of substance use and abuse, 103
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The neural mechanisms of inter-temporal decision-making: understanding variability
Peters, J., & Büchel, C. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.03.002 · Cited by 693
A unified framework for addiction: Vulnerabilities in the decision process
Redish, A. D., Jensen, S., & Johnson, A. (2008) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0800472x · Cited by 501
Delay discounting: Trait variable?
Odum, A. L. (2011) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2011.02.007 · Cited by 449
Miedl, S. F. (2012) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1552 · Cited by 229
The Malleability of Intertemporal Choice
Lempert, K. M., & Phelps, E. A. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.09.005 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Dixon, M. R., Jacobs, E. A., & Sanders, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 413-422
- ISSN
- 0021-8855
- 1938-3703
- Cited by
- 151
- References
- 7
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CONTEXTUAL CONTROL OF DELAY DISCOUNTING BY PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLERS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1901/jaba.2006.173-05
- The paper
- Dixon, M. R., Jacobs, E. A., & Sanders, S. (2006). CONTEXTUAL CONTROL OF DELAY DISCOUNTING BY PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLERS. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2006.173-05
