Cited by 1,059Social and Intergroup PsychologyDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsPsychological Testing and Assessment

Motivated inference: Self‐serving generation and evaluation of causal theories

Kunda, Ziva·1987·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.636

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies found that when a health message is of high personal relevance, people are more likely to scrutinize the message for fault than when a message is of no special relevance.

    “Several studies have found that when a health message is of high personal relevance, people are more likely to scrutinize the message for fault than when a message is of no special relevance (Ditto & Lopez, 1992;Kunda, 1987;Liberman & Chaiken, 1992).”

    From The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory (2006) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1987

  • In the Sherman, Nelson, and Steele (2000) study, in the no-affirmation control condition, coffee-drinking women were more critical of the scientific article and more resistant to the message than were non-coffee-drinking women.

    “Those in the no-aYrmation control condition exhibited the pattern found in earlier research (Kunda, 1987;Liberman & Chaiken, 1992): the coVee-drinking women were more critical of the scientific article and more resistant to the message than were the noncoVee drinking women”

    From The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory (2006) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1987

  • When people define what characteristics make a successful marriage, they emphasize characteristics they themselves possess rather than those they do not.

    “When people define what characteristics are likely to make a person have a successful marriage, they emphasize those characteristics that they themselves possess rather than those they do not (Kunda, 1987).”

    From The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory (2006) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1987

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kunda, Z.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Kunda, Ziva
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1987-10
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
636-647
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2091100244
Cited by
1,059
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 41
FWCI
94.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
self-serving bias, causal theories, causal explanation, theory generation, theory evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review