Cited by 67Nutrition and Health StudiesFolate and B Vitamins ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Vitamins and Cognition: What is the Evidence?

Kennedy, David O., Haskell, Crystal F.·2011·Drugs

Abstract

Vitamin supplements are consumed for their purported health benefits by a large segment of the populations of developed countries. Several indirect strands of evidence suggest that increasing levels of vitamins may improve brain function. These include evidence that individual vitamins are intrinsically involved in the cellular and physiological processes underpinning brain function; that small proportions of the population exhibit biochemical deficiencies in each individual vitamin, suggesting that a much larger proportion have less than optimal overall micronutrient status; and that epidemiological research suggests a relationship between individual vitamins (or the potentially neurotoxic amino acid homocysteine, which is related to B vitamin status), and cognitive function and mood. The related question as to whether direct supplementation with vitamins can therefore improve psychological functioning in cognitively intact individuals has been addressed in a number of studies. The evidence reviewed here suggests that, whereas studies involving supplementation with single vitamins, or restricted ranges of vitamins, have demonstrated equivocal results, evidence from studies involving the administration of broader ranges of vitamins, or multivitamins, suggest potential efficacy in terms of cognitive and psychological functioning. In contrast to the literature investigating restricted ranges of vitamins, most of the evidence regarding multivitamins was collected from healthy, non-elderly samples, suggesting that more research in this population is warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2165/11594130-000000000-00000

Cites

108 of 108 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kennedy, D. O., & Haskell, C. F.
Affiliations
Northumbria University (GB)
Corresponding author
Kennedy, David O.
Venue
Drugs
Published
2011-10
Volume
71
Issue
15
Pages
1957-1971
ISSN
0012-6667 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1561530207
Cited by
67
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drugs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Folate and B Vitamins Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
vitamins, cognitive function, multivitamin supplementation, micronutrient status, homocysteine, B vitamins, mood, brain function, vitamin deficiency
MeSH terms
Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Vitamins, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review