Cited by 171Child Nutrition and Water AccessWater Resource Management and QualityWater Governance and Infrastructure

Psychosocial impacts of the lack of access to water and sanitation in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review

Bisung, Elijah, Elliott, Susan J.·2017·Journal of Water and Health

Abstract

The lack of access to safe water and adequate sanitation has implications for the psychosocial well-being of individuals and households. To review the literature on psychosocial impacts, we completed a scoping review of the published literature using Medline, Embase, and Scopus. Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed in detail. Of the included studies, six were conducted in India, one in Nepal, one in Mexico, one in Bolivia, two in Ethiopia, one in Zimbabwe, one in South Africa, and two in Kenya. Four interrelated groups of stressors emerged from the review: physical stressors, financial stressors, social stressors, and stressors related to (perceived) inequities. Further, gender differences were observed, with women carrying a disproportionate psychosocial burden. We argue that failure to incorporate psychosocial stressors when estimating the burden or benefits of safe water and sanitation may mask an important driver of health and well-being for many households in low- and middle-income countries. We propose further research on water-related stressors with particular attention to unique cultural norms around water and sanitation, short and long term psychosocial outcomes, and individual and collective coping strategies. These may help practitioners better understand cumulative impacts and mechanisms for addressing water and sanitation challenges.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2166/wh.2016.158

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bisung, E., & Elliott, S. J.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Bisung, Elijah
Venue
Journal of Water and Health
Published
2016-11-10
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
17-30
ISSN
  • 1477-8920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1996-7829
OpenAlex
W2557196844
Cited by
171
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Water and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Waterloo
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Water Governance and Infrastructure
Keywords
water and sanitation, psychosocial well-being, low- and middle-income countries, financial stressors, social stressors, perceived inequity, gender differences, women's burden, coping strategies, household welfare
MeSH terms
Developing Countries, Humans, Hygiene, Psychology, Sanitation, Water Supply

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review