Cited by 210Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityYeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesFungal Infections and Studies

Epidemiology of Candida albicans Infections and Role of Non-Candidaalbicans Yeasts

Ruhnke, Markus·2006·Current Drug Targets

Abstract

Infections of the skin and the mucous membranes due to Candida species may occur either in immuncompromised or in non-immuncompromised patients. This is in contrast to systemic candidiasis (e.g. candidemia) which is only seen in severely immunocompromised patients. Bloodstream infections caused by Candida species are increasingly recognized in critical ill adult and pediatric individuals, with significant associated morbidity and mortality. Candida albicans is the single most common fungal species causing nosocomial infections. However, non-Candida albicans spp., including fluconazole-less-susceptible Candida glabrata, have become more common pathogens. In some patient populations such as hematological (neutropenic) patients Non-C. albicans species are detected much more frequently as compared to non-neutropenic patients in the intensive care. Non-C. albicans species are more likely to occur in patients, who receive or have received antifungal therapy with azoles (e.g. fluconazole). In this review the current epidemiological trends in mucosal and invasive candidiasis are discussed with regard to the role of non-Candida albicans species as the causative agent in immunocompromised patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/138945006776359421

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Historically, Candida albicans has been the leading cause of candidemia; however, candidemia involving non-C. albicans spp., especially Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis, Candida tropicalis, and Candida krusei, has become more prevalent in recent years.

    “Historically, Candida albicans has been the leading cause of candidemia; however, candidemia involving non-C. albicans spp., especially Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis, Candida tropicalis, and Candida krusei, has become more prevalent in recent years (11).”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruhnke, M.
Affiliations
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Ruhnke, Markus
Venue
Current Drug Targets
Published
2006-04-01
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
495-504
ISSN
1389-4501 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091312819
Cited by
210
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 10
FWCI
10.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Drug Targets (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, invasive candidiasis, candidemia, mucosal candidiasis, immunocompromised patients, nosocomial infections, fluconazole resistance, azole antifungal therapy, hematologic patients, neutropenia, intensive care unit patients, fungal epidemiology
MeSH terms
Candida, Candida albicans, Candidiasis, Europe, Humans, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Drug Resistance, Fungal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review