Cited by 319Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Effectiveness of CBT for children and adolescents with depression: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis

Open access
Oud, Matthijs, de Winter, Lars, Vermeulen-Smit, Evelien, Bodden, Denise, Nauta, Maaike, Stone, Lisanne, van den Heuvel, Marieke, Taher, Reham Al +4 more·2019·European Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is first choice of treatment for depressive symptoms and disorders in adolescents, however improvements are necessary because overall efficacy is low. Insights on CBT components and contextual and structural characteristics might increase the efficacy. The aim of our approach is to evaluate the efficacy of CBT for youth with depression and investigate the influence of specific components, contextual and structural factors that could improve effects. Methods: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials was conducted, searches were undertaken in CINAHL, CENTRAL, EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed and PsycINFO. Outcomes were meta-analyzed and confidence in results was assessed using the GRADE-method. Meta-regression was used to pinpoint components or other factors that were associated with an in- or decrease of effects of CBT. Results: We included 31 trials with 4335 participants. Moderate-quality evidence was found for CBT reducing depressive symptoms at the end of treatment and at follow-up, and CBT as indicated prevention resulted in 63% less risk of being depressed at follow-up. CBT containing a combination of behavioral activation and challenging thoughts component (as part of cognitive restructuring) or the involvement of caregiver(s) in intervention were associated with better outcomes for youth on the long term. Conclusions: There is evidence that CBT is effective for youth with a (subclinical) depression. Our analyses show that effects might improve when CBT contains the components behavioral activation and challenging thoughts and also when the caregiver(s) are involved. However, the influential effects of these three moderators should be further tested in RCTs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.12.008

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CBT is effective for the treatment of depression and prevention of relapse in non-autistic children and adolescents.

    “A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of 31 randomized controlled trials indicates that CBT is effective for the treatment of depression and prevention of relapse in non-autistic children and adolescents (Oud et al., 2019).”

    From Community-guided, autism-adapted group cognitive behavioral therapy for depression in autistic youth (CBT-DAY): Preliminary feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy (2024) · cites this paper as Oud et al., 2019

    The Results (Table 2 and §3.5.2.2; page not available) report reductions in depressive symptoms with CBT, supporting the treatment claim. But the paper assesses follow-up symptoms and risk of a depressive disorder, not prevention of relapse after recovery. Its eligibility criteria (§2.1) also do not identify a specifically non-autistic population. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There is a growing evidence base reporting that CBT is effective for the prevention and treatment of anxiety and depression symptoms in adolescents and young adults.

    “There is a growing evidence base reporting on the effectiveness of CBT for the prevention and treatment of anxiety and depression symptoms in AYA [11, 12].”

    From Feasibility and potential efficacy of a guided internet- and mobile-based CBT for adolescents and young adults with chronic medical conditions and comorbid depression or anxiety symptoms (youthCOACHCD): a randomized controlled pilot trial (2022) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Abstract reports that CBT reduced depressive symptoms in youth and that indicated prevention lowered the risk of depression at follow-up. The Eligibility criteria limit the review to children and adolescents with depressive symptoms or disorders; it does not establish effectiveness for anxiety symptoms or young adults. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CBT is the most well-documented and researched type of treatment for child and adolescent populations.

    “Although cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is the most well-documented and researched type of treatment for child and adolescent populations (Christ et al., 2020; James et al., 2013; Oud et al., 2019)”

    From Investigating the potential of a novel internet-based cognitive behavioural intervention for Dari and Farsi speaking refugee youth: A feasibility study (2022) · cites this paper as Oud et al., 2019

    The Introduction describes CBT as an evidence-based treatment for youth depression and notes several meta-analyses of its effects; the Abstract reports a review of 31 trials. These passages show that CBT is well researched for depression in children and adolescents, but they do not establish that it is the most researched treatment across child and adolescent populations. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The efficacy of CBT, particularly its exposure techniques, behavioral activation, and cognitive restructuring components, has been well established.

    “The efficacy of CBT, particularly its exposure techniques, behavioral acti vation, and cognitive restructuring components, has been well estab lished (Oud et al., 2019; Stiede et al., 2023).”

    From Process of change and efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for anxiety and depression symptoms in adolescents: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. (2025) · cites this paper as Oud et al., 2019

    The Abstract reports evidence that CBT reduces depressive symptoms in youth, and §3.6 links the combination of behavioral activation and challenging thoughts (part of cognitive restructuring) to better follow-up outcomes. But §4.3 says a causal benefit from those components needs further evidence, and the cited passages do not establish the efficacy of exposure techniques. The claim therefore overstates what this review establishes about the components. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CBT has been shown to be effective in adolescents, outperforming both no intervention and other talk-based therapies.

    “CBT has been shown to be effective in adolescents, outperforming both no intervention and other talk-based therapies (61, 62).”

    From Recent developments in bibliotherapy for adolescent depression (2025) · cites this paper as [61]

    Section 3.5.2.1 reports that CBT reduced depressive symptoms compared with waitlist/no treatment, supporting that part of the claim for youth with depression. The Introduction says interpersonal psychotherapy has not been shown to be more effective than CBT, but that does not establish that CBT outperforms other talk-based therapies. Section 4.1 also notes evidence that a brief psychosocial intervention can be as effective as CBT. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Higgins JPT, Green S, Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008.
  2. The Nordic Cochrane Centre (The Cochrane Collaboration). Review manager (RevMan) version 5.3. Copenhagen; 2014.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oud, M., de Winter, L., Vermeulen-Smit, E., Bodden, D., Nauta, M., Stone, L., van den Heuvel, M., Taher, R. A., de Graaf, I., Kendall, T., Engels, R., & Stikkelbroek, Y.
Affiliations
  • Trimbos Institute (NL)
  • Christian University of Applied Sciences (NL)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • National Health Service (GB)
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Oud, Matthijs
Venue
European Psychiatry
Published
2019-01-16
Volume
57
Pages
33-45
ISSN
  • 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1778-3585
OpenAlex
W2909121890
Cited by
319
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10
FWCI
4.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
ZonMw
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, adolescent depression, childhood depression, treatment efficacy, behavioral activation, cognitive restructuring, caregiver involvement, depression prevention, treatment moderators
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Regression Analysis, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review