Cited by 112Epigenetics and DNA MethylationPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChild Abuse and Trauma

Traumatic stress and human DNA methylation: A critical review

Vinkers, Christiaan H, Kalafateli, Aimilia Lydia, Rutten, Bart PF, Kas, Martien J, Kaminsky, Zachary, Turner, Jonathan D, Boks, Marco PM·2015·Epigenomics

Abstract

Animal studies have identified persistent and functional effects of traumatic stress on the epigenome. This review discusses the clinical evidence for trauma-induced changes in DNA methylation across the life span in humans. Studies are reviewed based on reports of trauma exposure during the prenatal period (13 studies), early life (20 studies), and adulthood (ten studies). Even though it is apparent that traumatic stress influences the human epigenome, there are significant drawbacks in the existing human literature. These include a lack of longitudinal studies, methodological heterogeneity, selection of tissue type, and the influence of developmental stage and trauma type on methylation outcomes. These issues are discussed in order to present a way in which future studies can gain more insight into the functional relevance of trauma-related DNA methylation changes. Epigenetic studies investigating the detrimental effects of traumatic stress have great potential for an improved detection and treatment of trauma-related psychiatric disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2217/epi.15.11

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vinkers, C. H., Kalafateli, A. L., Rutten, B. P., Kas, M. J., Kaminsky, Z., Turner, J. D., & Boks, M. P.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
  • Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, Department of Translational Neuroscience, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Laboratoire National de Santé (LU)
Venue
Epigenomics
Published
2015-06
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
593-608
ISSN
  • 1750-1911 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-192X
OpenAlex
W1869592690
Cited by
112
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Epigenomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Neuroscience and Cognition initiative from the University Utrecht
  • VENI (451.13.001)
  • The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research
  • Netherlands B rain Foundation Fellowship (F2013(1) -216)
  • Brain Foundation Fellowship (916.11.086)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
traumatic stress, DNA methylation, epigenetics, trauma exposure, prenatal trauma, early trauma, adult trauma, tissue type, developmental stages, longitudinal study
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, DNA Methylation, Stress Disorders, Traumatic, Epigenesis, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review