Cited by 488Epigenetics and DNA MethylationChild Abuse and TraumaPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Genome-wide epigenetic regulation by early-life trauma

Open access
Labonté, Benoit, Suderman, Matt, Maussion, Gilles, Navaro, Luis, Yerko, Volodymyr, Mahar, Ian, Bureau, Alexandre, Mechawar, Naguib +3 more·2012·Archives of General Psychiatry

Abstract

CONTEXT: Our genome adapts to environmental influences, in part through epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation. Variations in the quality of the early environment are associated with alterations in DNA methylation in rodents, and recent data suggest similar processes in humans in response to early-life adversity. OBJECTIVE: To determine genome-wide DNA methylation alterations induced by early-life trauma. DESIGN: Genome-wide study of promoter methylation in individuals with severe abuse during childhood. PATIENTS, SETTING, AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Promoter DNA methylation levels were profiled using methylated DNA immunoprecipitation followed by microarray hybridization in hippocampal tissue from 41 French-Canadian men (25 with a history of severe childhood abuse and 16 control subjects). Methylation profiles were compared with corresponding genome-wide gene expression profiles obtained by messenger RNA microarrays. Methylation differences between groups were validated on neuronal and nonneuronal DNA fractions isolated by fluorescence-assisted cell sorting. Functional consequences of site-specific promoter methylation were assessed by luciferase assays. RESULTS: We identified 362 differentially methylated promoters in individuals with a history of abuse compared with controls. Among these promoters, 248 showed hypermethylation and 114 demonstrated hypomethylation. Validation and site-specific quantification of DNA methylation in the 5 most hypermethylated gene promoters indicated that methylation differences occurred mainly in the neuronal cellular fraction. Genes involved in cellular/neuronal plasticity were among the most significantly differentially methylated, and, among these, Alsin (ALS2) was the most significant finding. Methylated ALS2 constructs mimicking the methylation state in samples from abused suicide completers showed decreased promoter transcriptional activity associated with decreased hippocampal expression of ALS2 variants. CONCLUSION: Childhood adversity is associated with epigenetic alterations in the promoters of several genes in hippocampal neurons.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.2287

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Labonte and colleagues reported that in hippocampal tissues derived from those who had died by suicide, comparing those with and without a history of childhood abuse, there were 362 differentially methylated promoter sites; among these, 248 sites were hypermethylated and 114 were hypomethylated.

    “For example, Labonte and colleagues reported that in hippocampal tissues derived from those who had died by suicide, comparing those with and without a history of childhood abuse, there were 362 differentially methylated promoter sites. Among these, 248 sites were hypermethylated and 114 were hypomethylated (102).”

    From Epigenetic Modifications in Stress Response Genes Associated With Childhood Trauma (2019) · cites this paper as [102]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A genome-wide study of hippocampal tissue from 41 adult males found 362 differentially methylated gene promoter regions in individuals (n=25) who had experienced child abuse and completed suicide compared with psychiatrically healthy controls (n=16).

    “A genome-wide study of hippocampal tissue from 41 adult males found 362 differentially methylated gene promoter regions in individuals (n=25) who had experienced child abuse and completed suicide, compared with the psychiatrically healthy controls (n=16).”

    From Epigenetics and depression (2019) · cites this paper as [57]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In depression, altered chromatin accessibility has been observed at BDNF, GAD1, NR3C1 in response to stress.

    “In depression, altered chromatin accessibility have been observed at BDNF, GAD1, NR3C1 in response to stress”

    From The clinical use of epigenetics in psychiatry: a narrative review of epigenetic mechanisms, key candidate genes, and precision psychiatry (2025) · cites this paper as [43]

    The passage labeled Abstract (page unavailable) describes stress-related promoter hypermethylation involving BDNF, GAD1, and glucocorticoid-receptor variants, including methylation that constrains transcription-factor binding. It does not establish altered chromatin accessibility at all three genes in people with depression: the BDNF and GAD1 examples concern stressed rats, while the human example concerns suicide completers with childhood abuse. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In suicide studies, individuals with a history of suicide attempts or ideation that have been exposed to trauma have increased SLC6A4 methylation.

    “In suicide studies, individuals with a history of suicide attempts or ideation that have been exposed to trauma have increased SLC6A4 methylation”

    From The clinical use of epigenetics in psychiatry: a narrative review of epigenetic mechanisms, key candidate genes, and precision psychiatry (2025) · cites this paper as [43]

    The sample-selection section describes people who died by suicide, including a group with severe early-life abuse. The ALS2 promoter results report increased methylation in that abused group. The cited paper does not establish the claimed increase in SLC6A4 methylation or study people identified by a history of suicide attempts or ideation. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These DMRs were most pronounced in the neuronal fraction of the brain tissue and were enriched in genes involved in neuroplasticity.

    “These DMRs were most pronounced in the neuronal fraction of the brain tissue, and consistent with the findings in animal studies mentioned above, were enriched in genes involved in neuroplasticity. 57”

    From Epigenetics and depression (2019) · cites this paper as [57]

    The GENOME-WIDE PROMOTER METHYLATION DIFFERENCES section reports that four of five promoters tested showed significant methylation differences specific to the neuronal fraction; it does not establish this for all identified DMRs. The same section reports significant enrichment of genes associated with neuronal plasticity among differentially methylated genes. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bagot RC, Meaney MJ. Epigenetics and the biological basis of geneϫenvironment interactions. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010;49(8):752-771.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Labonté, B., Suderman, M., Maussion, G., Navaro, L., Yerko, V., Mahar, I., Bureau, A., Mechawar, N., Szyf, M., Meaney, M. J., & Turecki, G.
Affiliations
  • Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
Corresponding author
Turecki, Gustavo
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Published
2012-07-01
Volume
69
Issue
7
Pages
722-31
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2096799018
Cited by
488
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 5
FWCI
19.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (84291_1, MOP84291)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
early trauma, childhood abuse, DNA methylation, promoter methylation, epigenetic regulation, hippocampus, neuroplasticity, ALS2, alsin, suicide, gene expression
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Neurons, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Genome, DNA Methylation, Epigenesis, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review