The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MATCHING CREATIVITY REQUIREMENTS AND THE WORK ENVIRONMENT: EFFECTS ON SATISFACTION AND INTENTIONS TO LEAVE.
Abstract
In a survey of 2,200 individuals, the authors examined the degree to which work environments are structured to complement the creative requirements of jobs. Regression analyses indicated that proximal job characteristics were more strongly associated with a combined objective and perceptual measure of job-required creativity than were distal organizational characteristics. Furthermore, higher job satisfaction and lower intentions to leave were found for individuals whose work environments complemented the creative requirements of their jobs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign
Karasek, R. A. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392498 · Cited by 12,597
ASSESSING THE WORK ENVIRONMENT FOR CREATIVITY.
AMABILE, T. M., CONTI, R., COON, H., LAZENBY, J., & HERRON, M. (1996) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256995 · Cited by 6,029
Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals, and personal discretion on individual creativity.
Shalley, C. E. (1991) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.179 · Cited by 632
Self-citationSpector, P. E., & Jex, S. M. (1991) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.1.46 · Cited by 316
Creativity in the R&D Laboratory
Amabile, T., & Gryskiewicz, S. (1987) · doi:10.35613/ccl.1987.1088 · Cited by 295
Cited by
Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321 · Cited by 2,994
The Effects of Personal and Contextual Characteristics on Creativity: Where Should We Go from Here?
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007 · Cited by 2,678
Self-citationCREATIVE SELF-EFFICACY: ITS POTENTIAL ANTECEDENTS AND RELATIONSHIP TO CREATIVE PERFORMANCE.
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069429 · Cited by 2,787
Gong, Y., Huang, J.-C., & Farh, J.-L. (2009) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.43670890 · Cited by 1,914
Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time.
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020952 · Cited by 1,082
RESEARCH ON EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY: A CRITICAL REVIEW AND DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH
Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. E. (2004) · Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-7301(03)22004-1 · Cited by 770
Self-citationShalley, C. E., Gilson, L. L., & Blum, T. C. (2009) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.41330806 · Cited by 738
Self-citationJob satisfaction and organizational commitment: An empirical investigation among ICT-SMEs
Valaei, N., & Rezaei, S. (2016) · Management Research Review · doi:10.1108/mrr-09-2015-0216 · Cited by 659
Trust, Connectivity, and Thriving: Implications for Innovative Behaviors at Work
CARMELI, A., & SPREITZER, G. M. (2009) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01313.x · Cited by 551
Creativity and Standardization: Complementary or Conflicting Drivers of Team Effectiveness?
Gilson, L. L., Mathieu, J. E., Shalley, C. E., & Ruddy, T. M. (2005) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2005.17407916 · Cited by 445
Self-citationAdler, P. S., & Chen, C. X. (2011) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2011.02.002 · Cited by 329
Reconsidering the Trade-off Between Expertise and Flexibility: a Cognitive Entrenchment Perspective
Dane, E. (2010) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.35.4.zok579 · Cited by 603
Bidwell, M. J., & Briscoe, F. (2009) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.47084649 · Cited by 99
Hon, A. H. Y. (2013) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.06.003 · Cited by 86
Takeuchi, R., Guo, N., Teschner, R. S., & Kautz, J. (2021) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000949 · Cited by 39
A Workplace to Support Creativity
Samani, S. A., Rasid, S. Z. B. A., & bt Sofian, S. (2014) · Industrial Engineering and Management Systems · doi:10.7232/iems.2014.13.4.414 · Cited by 20
Outcomes of creativity in organizations: From organization to human-centered benefits
Puccio, G., & Schwartz, M. (2023) · Handbook of Organizational Creativity · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-91840-4.00004-9 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Shalley, C. E., Gilson, L. L., & Blum, T. C.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2000-04-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 215-223
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W1967322950
- Cited by
- 772
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 12.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.