The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument
Abstract
The dimensionality of the user satisfaction construct is an important theoretical issue that has received considerable attention. Focusing on end users who directly interact with application software, Doll and Torkzadeah (1988) develop a 12-item application specific instrument for providing an overall assessment of end-user computing satisfaction (EUCS). They also contend that EUCS is comprised of five component measures (content, accuracy, format, ease of use, timeliness) that explain the construct and permit more precision in formulating and testing research hypotheses. The acceptance of the EUCS as a standardized instrument requires confirmation that it explains and measures the user satisfaction construct.Based on a sample of 409 respondents from 18 organizations, this research uses confirmatory factor analysis (LISREL) to test alternative models of underlying factor structure and assess the reliability and validity of factors and items. Without respecifying the model, the results provide some support for Doll and Torkzadeh's proposed model of the five first-order factors and one second-order (higher-order) factor. Thus the evidence supports the use of: (1) the 12-item instrument as an overall measure of EUCS; and (2) the five component factors for explaining the EUCS construct.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.3.1.60 · Cited by 10,697
User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research
Ives, B., & Olson, M. H. (1984) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.30.5.586 · Cited by 1,318
Cited by
eTailQ: dimensionalizing, measuring and predicting etail quality
Wolfinbarger, M., & Gilly, M. C. (2003) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(03)00034-4 · Cited by 2,340
Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis
Rai, A., Lang, S. S., & Welker, R. B. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.1.50.96 · Cited by 1,611
User acceptance of YouTube for procedural learning: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model
Lee, D. Y., & Lehto, M. R. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.001 · Cited by 565
Chowdhury, S., Budhwar, P., Dey, P. K., Joel-Edgar, S., & Abadie, A. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.069 · Cited by 531
Al-Gahtani, S. S., & King, M. (1999) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/014492999119020 · Cited by 519
Hsu, M.-H., Yen, C.-H., Chiu, C.-M., & Chang, C.-M. (2006) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.04.004 · Cited by 490
Dey, P. K., Chowdhury, S., Abadie, A., Vann Yaroson, E., & Sarkar, S. (2024) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2023.2179859 · Cited by 330
(2004) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 315
Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Chowdhury, S., Dey, P. K., Albores, P., & Emrouznejad, A. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121562 · Cited by 279
Corporate Sustainable Development: Testing a New Scale Based on the Mainland Chinese Context
Chow, W. S., & Chen, Y. (2012) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0983-x · Cited by 265
Ma, S., & Lei, L. (2024) · Asia Pacific Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/02188791.2024.2305155 · Cited by 148
Tang, J.-S., & Feng, J.-Y. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15071434 · Cited by 131
Do, Q. H., Kim, T. Y., & Wang, X. (2023) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103165 · Cited by 128
Teacher Training Institute, M., Cheok, M. L., Wong, S. L., & Faculty of Educational Studies, U. P. M. (2015) · International Journal of Instruction · doi:10.12973/iji.2015.816a · Cited by 127
Chen, S.-C., Liu, M.-L., & Lin, C.-P. (2013) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0606 · Cited by 127
Najmul Islam, A. K. M. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.09.010 · Cited by 107
Mollah, M. A., Choi, J.-H., Hwang, S.-J., & Shin, J.-K. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15107875 · Cited by 79
Yen, P.-Y., Sousa, K. H., & Bakken, S. (2014) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001811 · Cited by 75
Identifying issues in customer relationship management at merck-medco
Torkzadeh, G., Chang, J. C.-J., & Hansen, G. W. (2006) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2005.10.003 · Cited by 56
Self-citationLee, Y.-J. (2024) · Current Issues in Tourism · doi:10.1080/13683500.2023.2178395 · Cited by 41
Understanding the Importance of Cultural Appropriateness for User Interface Design: An Avatar Study
Aljaroodi, H. M., Adam, M. T. P., Teubner, T., & Chiong, R. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3517138 · Cited by 41
Aulina, L., & Yuliati, E. (2017) · Proceedings of the International Conference on Business and Management Research (ICBMR-17) · doi:10.2991/icbmr-17.2017.50 · Cited by 40
ChatGPT and generation 'Z': a study on the usage rates of ChatGPT
Babu, M. A., Yusuf, K. M., Eni, L. N., Jaman, S. M. S., & Sharmin, M. R. (2024) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101163 · Cited by 19
Customer behavior toward online insurance services in India
Khare, A., Dixit, S., Chaudhary, R., Kochhar, P., & Mishra, S. (2012) · Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management · doi:10.1057/dbm.2012.14 · Cited by 18
Huang, Y., Huang, B., & Yang, Z. (2026) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-025-01529-6 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G.
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 1994-12-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 453-461
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W2156423962
- Cited by
- 1,401
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
