The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Corporate Social Performance Revisited
Abstract
This article defines corporate social performance (CSP) and reformulates the CSP model to build a coherent, integrative framework for business and society research. Principles of social responsibility are framed at the institutional, organizational, and individual levels; processes of social responsiveness are shown to be environmental assessment, stakeholder management, and issues management; and outcomes of CSP are posed as social impacts, programs, and policies. Rethinking CSP in this manner points to vital research questions that have not yet been addressed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance
Carroll, A. B. (1979) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257850 · Cited by 10,480
Cited by
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Suchman, M. C. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258788 · Cited by 19,903
Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910 · Cited by 7,641
WHY COMPANIES GO GREEN: A MODEL OF ECOLOGICAL RESPONSIVENESS.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556363 · Cited by 4,020
CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL ATTRACTIVENESS TO PROSPECTIVE EMPLOYEES.
TURBAN, D. B., & GREENING, D. W. (1997) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/257057 · Cited by 3,149
Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art
Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & de Colle, S. (2010) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2010.495581 · Cited by 2,755
Moving beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences
Rowley, T. J. (1997) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1997.9711022107 · Cited by 2,522
Barnett, M. L. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.25275520 · Cited by 2,060
Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: An Integrative Framework
Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2004) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070303258971 · Cited by 1,873
Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006) · Business Ethics: A European Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00460.x · Cited by 1,653
Jones, T. M., & Wicks, A. C. (1999) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259075 · Cited by 1,595
Responding to public and private politics: corporate disclosure of climate change strategies
Reid, E. M., & Toffel, M. W. (2009) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.796 · Cited by 1,093
STAKEHOLDER MISMATCHING: A THEORETICAL PROBLEM IN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE
Wood, D. J., & Jones, R. E. (1995) · The International Journal of Organizational Analysis · doi:10.1108/eb028831 · Cited by 1,069
Self-citationCorporate Reputation and Philanthropy: An Empirical Analysis
Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2005) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-005-7443-4 · Cited by 984
The Business Case for Corporate Sustainability:
Salzmann, O., Ionescu-somers, A., & Steger, U. (2005) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2004.12.007 · Cited by 930
The Link Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance: Evidence from the Banking Industry
Simpson, W. G., & Kohers, T. (2002) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1023/a:1013082525900 · Cited by 917
Ameer, R., & Othman, R. (2012) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1063-y · Cited by 796
The Relationship between Perceptions of Corporate Citizenship and Organizational Commitment
Peterson, D. K. (2004) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650304268065 · Cited by 781
The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer trust: The case of organic food
Pivato, S., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2008) · Business Ethics: A European Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8608.2008.00515.x · Cited by 700
SUSTAINABILITY INNOVATION CUBE — A FRAMEWORK TO EVALUATE SUSTAINABILITY-ORIENTED INNOVATIONS
HANSEN, E. G., GROSSE-DUNKER, F., & REICHWALD, R. (2009) · International Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1142/s1363919609002479 · Cited by 633
A Corporate Social Performance–Corporate Financial Performance Behavioral Model for Consumers
Schuler, D. A., & Cording, M. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.21318916 · Cited by 493
Mani, V., Gunasekaran, A., & Delgado, C. (2018) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.025 · Cited by 408
Post, C., Rahman, N., & McQuillen, C. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2231-7 · Cited by 381
Commitment to social good and insider trading
Gao, F., Lisic, L. L., & Zhang, I. X. (2014) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.03.001 · Cited by 375
Gualandris, J., Klassen, R. D., Vachon, S., & Kalchschmidt, M. (2015) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2015.06.002 · Cited by 365
Predicting stakeholder orientation in the multinational enterprise: A mid-range theory
Crilly, D. (2011) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2010.57 · Cited by 331
Corporate Sustainable Development: Testing a New Scale Based on the Mainland Chinese Context
Chow, W. S., & Chen, Y. (2012) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0983-x · Cited by 265
Modeling corporate citizenship, organizational trust, and work engagement based on attachment theory
Lin, C.-P. (2010) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0279-6 · Cited by 237
Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Current Concepts, Research, and Issues
Carroll, A. B., & Brown, J. A. (2018) · Corporate Social Responsibility · doi:10.1108/s2514-175920180000002002 · Cited by 224
Instrumental and/or deliberative? A typology of CSR communication tools
Seele, P., & Lock, I. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2282-9 · Cited by 202
De Stefano, F., Bagdadli, S., & Camuffo, A. (2018) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21870 · Cited by 193
Mani, V., Delgado, C., Hazen, B., & Patel, P. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su9040608 · Cited by 160
Measuring corporate environmental performance: a methodology for sustainable development
Escrig‐Olmedo, E., Muñoz‐Torres, M. J., Fernández‐Izquierdo, M. Á., & Rivera‐Lirio, J. M. (2017) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1904 · Cited by 159
Constructing a Corporate Social Responsibility Reputation Using Corporate Image Advertising
Pomering, A., & Johnson, L. W. (2009) · Australasian Marketing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ausmj.2009.05.006 · Cited by 144
Chen, X. (2022) · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2022.100189 · Cited by 107
Social Contracting as a Trust-Building Process of Network Governance
Calton, J. M., & Lad, L. J. (1995) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3857357 · Cited by 100
Managing sustainability reporting: Many ways to publish exemplary reports
Thijssens, T., Bollen, L., & Hassink, H. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.098 · Cited by 94
Tian, Q., Liu, Y., & Fan, J. (2015) · Journal of Management & Organization · doi:10.1017/jmo.2015.14 · Cited by 83
Revisiting the Scientometric Conceptualization of Impact and Its Measurement
Abramo, G. (2018) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2018.05.001 · Cited by 80
Skouloudis, A., Evangelinos, K., Nikolaou, I., & Filho, W. L. (2011) · Business Ethics: A European Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8608.2011.01619.x · Cited by 65
The stakeholder value proposition of digital platforms in an urban ecosystem
Carrasco-Farré, C., Snihur, Y., Berrone, P., & Ricart, J. E. (2022) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2022.104488 · Cited by 54
What we talk about when we talk about stakeholders
Johnson-Cramer, M. E., Phillips, R. A., Fadlallah, H., Berman, S. L., & Elms, H. (2022) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/00076503211053005 · Cited by 31
An emerging template of CSR in Switzerland
Looser, S., & Wehrmeyer, W. (2015) · Corporate Ownership and Control · doi:10.22495/cocv12i3c5p6 · Cited by 22
Exclude Me Not: The Untold Story of Immigrant Entrepreneurs in Sweden
Kordestani, A., Sattari, S., Peighambari, K., & Oghazi, P. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su9091584 · Cited by 18
Silveira, A. D. M. D., & Donaggio, A. R. F. (2020) · DESC - Direito, Economia e Sociedade Contemporânea · doi:10.33389/desc.v2n2.2019.p11-42 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Wood, D. J.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1991-10
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 691
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2123760334
- Cited by
- 5,093
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 59.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
