Cited by 129Metabolism, Diabetes, and CancerDietary Effects on HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Mechanism by Which Caloric Restriction Improves Insulin Sensitivity in Sedentary Obese Adults

Open access
Johnson, Matthew L., Distelmaier, Klaus, Lanza, Ian R., Irving, Brian A., Robinson, Matthew M., Konopka, Adam R., Shulman, Gerald I., Nair, K. Sreekumaran·2016·Diabetes

Abstract

Caloric restriction (CR) improves insulin sensitivity and reduces the incidence of diabetes in obese individuals. The underlying mechanisms whereby CR improves insulin sensitivity are not clear. We evaluated the effect of 16 weeks of CR on whole-body insulin sensitivity by pancreatic clamp before and after CR in 11 obese participants (BMI = 35 kg/m(2)) compared with 9 matched control subjects (BMI = 34 kg/m(2)). Compared with the control subjects, CR increased the glucose infusion rate needed to maintain euglycemia during hyperinsulinemia, indicating enhancement of peripheral insulin sensitivity. This improvement in insulin sensitivity was not accompanied by changes in skeletal muscle mitochondrial oxidative capacity or oxidant emissions, nor were there changes in skeletal muscle ceramide, diacylglycerol, or amino acid metabolite levels. However, CR lowered insulin-stimulated thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) levels and enhanced nonoxidative glucose disposal. These results support a role for TXNIP in mediating the improvement in peripheral insulin sensitivity after CR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/db15-0675

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Weight loss by caloric restriction in obese people enhances insulin sensitivity but does not improve maximal mitochondrial oxidative capacity in isolated mitochondria or mitochondrial content.

    “Weight loss by caloric restriction in obese people enhanced insulin sensitivity but did not improve maximal mitochondrial oxidative capacity in isolated mitochondria or mitochondrial content (91,92).”
  • Caloric restriction designed to reduce body weight by 10% within 16 weeks in obese humans can significantly improve insulin sensitivity even without improvements in mitochondrial content and oxidative capacity.

    “Two separate studies have shown that even in the absence of improvements in mitochondrial content and oxidative capacity, CR designed to reduce body weight by 10% within 16 weeks in obese humans can significantly improve insulin sensitivity.116, 117”
  • In 11 obese individuals, 16 weeks of CR increased insulin sensitivity but did not affect skeletal muscle mitochondrial oxidative capacity or oxidant emissions.

    “Similarly, 16 weeks of CR increased insulin sensitivity in 11 individuals who were obese but did not affect skeletal muscle mitochondrial oxidative capacity or oxidant emissions (Johnson et al., 2016).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, M. L., Distelmaier, K., Lanza, I. R., Irving, B. A., Robinson, M. M., Konopka, A. R., Shulman, G. I., & Nair, K. S.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Nair, K. Sreekumaran
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2015-08-31
Volume
65
Issue
1
Pages
74-84
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2210293160
Cited by
129
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
4.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U24-DK-100469, DK-50456, T32-DK-007198, T32-DK-007352, R01-DK-49230, R24-DK-090963, R01-DK-41973, UL1-TR-000135)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (KL2-TR-000136-07, KL2-RR-024151)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
caloric restriction, insulin sensitivity, obesity, sedentary adults, TXNIP, nonoxidative glucose disposal, skeletal muscle, mitochondrial oxidative capacity, ceramide, diacylglycerol, hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, type 2 diabetes prevention
MeSH terms
Amino Acids, Blood Glucose, Calorimetry, Indirect, Carrier Proteins, Ceramides, Diglycerides, Energy Metabolism, Female, Humans, Hydrogen Peroxide, Insulin Resistance, Male, Middle Aged, Mitochondria, Muscle, Obesity, Oxidation-Reduction, Blotting, Western, Glucose Clamp Technique, Case-Control Studies, Muscle, Skeletal, Caloric Restriction, Sedentary Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review