Cited by 780Digital and Traditional Archives ManagementInformation Systems Theories and ImplementationInformation Systems and Technology Applications

The Ambivalent Ontology of Digital Artifacts1

Open access
Kallinikos, Jannis, Aaltonen, Aleksi, Marton, Attila·2013·MIS Quarterly

Abstract

Digital artifacts are embedded in wider and constantly shifting ecosystems such that they become increasingly editable, interactive, reprogrammable, and distributable. This state of flux and constant transfiguration renders the value and utility of these artifacts contingent on shifting webs of functional relations with other artifacts across specific contexts and organizations. By the same token, it apportions control over the development and use of these artifacts over a range of dispersed stakeholders and makes their management a complex technical and social undertaking. These ideas are illustrated with reference to (1) provenance and authenticity of digital documents within the overall context of archiving and social memory and (2) the content dynamics occasioned by the findability of content mediated by Internet search engines. We conclude that the steady change and transfiguration of digital artifacts signal a shift of epochal dimensions that calls for rethinking some of the inherited wisdom in IS research and practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.25300/misq/2013/37.2.02

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Digital resources can be edited and reprogrammed, and their functionality can be deferred until the point of use.

    “At a time when digital resources are readily editable (Kallinikos et al. 2013), reprogrammable (Yoo et al. 2010), and functionality can be procrastinated until the point of use (Eaton et al. 2015;Henfridsson et al. 2014)”

    From Recombination in the open-ended value landscape of digital innovation (2018) · cites this paper as Kallinikos et al. 2013

  • Prior information systems work on cocreation and digital architecture concentrates on design recombination carried out by firms.

    “In prior work, such as the literatures on cocreation in the business value of IT (Grover and Kohli 2012;Sarker et al. 2012) and digital architecture (Kallinikos et al. 2013;Shapiro and Varian 1999;Yoo et al. 2010), there is a clear focus on design and recombination being performed by the firm.”

    From Recombination in the open-ended value landscape of digital innovation (2018) · cites this paper as Kallinikos et al. 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kallinikos, J., Aaltonen, A., & Marton, A.
Affiliations
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
  • Hanken School of Economics (FI)
  • Department of IT Management, Copenhagen Business School, Howitzvej 60, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
Venue
MIS Quarterly
Publisher
MIS Quarterly
Published
2013-06-01
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
357-370
ISSN
  • 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-9730
OpenAlex
W2019920685
Cited by
780
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 73 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 107 · 2022: 102 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
423.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • MIS Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
  • Journal of the Association for Information Systems (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS - Institutional Research Information System (Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli) (submittedVersion)
  • CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Warwick (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Digital and Traditional Archives Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems and Technology Applications
Keywords
digital artifacts, ontology, digital archiving, provenance, authenticity, social memory, discoverability, search engines, stakeholder control, information systems research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review