Cited by 253Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesVeterinary Pharmacology and AnesthesiaWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Measuring zoo animal welfare: theory and practice

Hill, Sonya P., Broom, Donald M.·2009·Zoo Biology

Abstract

The assessment of animal welfare relates to investigations of how animals try to cope with their environment, and how easy or how difficult it is for them to do so. The use of rigorous scientific methods to assess this has grown over the past few decades, and so our understanding of the needs of animals has improved during this time. Much of the work in the field of animal welfare has been conducted on farm animals, but it is important to consider how the methods and approaches used in assessing farm animal welfare have been, and can be, adapted and applied to the measurement of welfare in animals in other domains, such as in zoos. This is beneficial to our understanding of both the theoretical knowledge, and the practicability of methods. In this article, some of the commonly-used methods for measuring animal welfare will be discussed, as well as some practical considerations in assessing the welfare of zoo animals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/zoo.20276

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Denying elephants freedoms can result in maladaptation, chronic stress, poor welfare, and abnormal stereotypic behaviors.

    “Denying these freedoms can result in maladaptation, chronic stress, poor welfare (32, 33), and abnormal stereotypic behaviors (34, 35).”
  • Some species do not demonstrate overt behavioral responses to stress, and hence an absence of abnormalities does not necessarily indicate a suitable environment.

    “However, some species do not demonstrate overt behavioral responses to stress, and hence an absence of abnormalities does not necessarily indicate a suitable environment (Hill and Broom, 2009).”

    From Husbandry and enclosure influences on penguin behavior and conservation breeding (2016) · cites this paper as Hill and Broom, 2009

  • Two individuals of the same species housed in the same environment and provided with the same husbandry will not necessarily perceive the environment in the same way and may have very different welfare outcomes.

    “two individuals of the same species housed in the same environment and provided with the same husbandry will not necessarily perceive the environment in the same way and, as a result, may have very different welfare outcomes [124,125,126].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hill, S. P., & Broom, D. M.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Hill, Sonya P.
Venue
Zoo Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-10-08
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
531-544
ISSN
  • 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2361
OpenAlex
W2041861293
Cited by
252
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
zoo animal welfare, animal welfare assessment, captive animals, animal needs, zoo animal husbandry
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Welfare, Animals, Zoo, Behavior, Animal, Health Status, Monitoring, Physiologic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review