Cited by 91Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

Traumatic encephalopathy: Review and provisional research diagnostic criteria

Victoroff, Jeff·2013·Neurorehabilitation

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency of neurobehavioral signs and symptoms reported in every published case of traumatic encephalopathy with a view toward the development of clinical diagnostic criteria with predictive validity. INTRODUCTION: Cases of persistent or progressive neurological or neurobehavioral change following exposure to one or more head injuries have been reported since 1928. This condition is often referred to as traumatic encephalopathy (TE). To date, however, no diagnostic criteria have been advanced or accepted for the clinical diagnosis of TE. Provisional research diagnostic criteria are required not only for meaningful diagnosis but also to facilitate research to determine the epidemiology, etiology, course, prognosis, imaging and biomarkers, neuropathological features and potentially effective treatments of TE. METHODS: All 436 published cases of TE in all languages were reviewed. All symptoms and signs reported in these cases were classified and enumerated. RESULTS: Ninety-seven cases met inclusion criteria based on sufficient documentation of the history and neurobehavioral examination. Provisional research diagnostic criteria for clinically probable and clinically possible TE were developed based on the most frequently reported clinical features. CONCLUSION: The provisional diagnostic criteria for TE presented here are the first published criteria for this condition based upon a systematic analysis of its clinical characteristics. This is the first a step toward scientifically derived consensus criteria, which are essential to accelerate progress in the investigation of this important condition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/nre-130839

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are no agreed upon or validated clinical criteria for CTE, although proposed criteria have been published by Jordan, Victoroff, and Montenigro and colleagues.

    “There are no agreed upon or validated clinical criteria for CTE, although proposed criteria have been published by Jordan [46], Victoroff [47], and Montenigro and colleagues [21].”
  • There are no agreed upon clinical criteria for diagnosis of CTE, although sets of criteria have been proposed for research purposes.

    “There are no agreed upon clinical criteria for diagnosis, although sets of criteria have been proposed for research purposes.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 76 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Victoroff, J.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Victoroff, Jeff
Venue
Neurorehabilitation
Published
2013-04-11
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
211-224
ISSN
  • 1053-8135 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-6448
OpenAlex
W95155789
Cited by
91
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
5.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurorehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
traumatic encephalopathy, Research Diagnostic Criteria, diagnosis, neurobehavioral symptoms, traumatic brain injury, clinical features, case review
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Brain Injuries, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Databases, Factual, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review