Cited by 9

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rab10-Positive Tubular Structures Represent a Novel Endocytic Pathway That Diverges From Canonical Macropinocytosis in RAW264 Macrophages

Kawai, Katsuhisa, Nishigaki, Arata, Moriya, Seiji, Egami, Youhei, Araki, Nobukazu·2021·Frontiers in Immunology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Using the optogenetic photo-manipulation of photoactivatable (PA)-Rac1, remarkable cell surface ruffling and the formation of a macropinocytic cup (premacropinosome) could be induced in the region of RAW264 macrophages irradiated with blue light due to the activation of PA-Rac1. However, the completion of macropinosome formation did not occur until Rac1 was deactivated by the removal of the light stimulus. Following PA-Rac1 deactivation, some premacropinosomes closed into intracellular macropinosomes, whereas many others transformed into long Rab10-positive tubules without forming typical macropinosomes. These Rab10-positive tubules moved centripetally towards the perinuclear Golgi region along microtubules. Surprisingly, these Rab10-positive tubules did not contain any endosome/lysosome compartment markers, such as Rab5, Rab7, or LAMP1, suggesting that the Rab10-positive tubules were not part of the degradation pathway for lysosomes. These Rab10-positive tubules were distinct from recycling endosomal compartments, which are labeled with Rab4, Rab11, or SNX1. These findings suggested that these Rab10-positive tubules may be a part of non-degradative endocytic pathway that has never been known. The formation of Rab10-positive tubules from premacropinosomes was also observed in control and phorbol myristate acetate (PMA)-stimulated macrophages, although their frequencies were low. Interestingly, the formation of Rab10-positive premacropinosomes and tubules was not inhibited by phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors, while the classical macropinosome formation requires PI3K activity. Thus, this study provides evidence to support the existence of Rab10-positive tubules as a novel endocytic pathway that diverges from canonical macropinocytosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fimmu.2021.649600

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RAB10 has been implicated in diverse areas of membrane trafficking in different cell types, including formation of noncanonical macropinosome tubules in macrophages, vesicle transportation from early endosome to recycling endosome in C. elegans, and Golgi to plasma membrane transport in macrophages.

    “RAB10 has also been implicated in diverse areas of membrane trafficking in different cell types, including formation of noncanonical macropinosome tubules in macrophages (49), vesicle transportation from early endosome to recycling endosome in C. elegans (31), and Golgi to plasma membrane transport in macrophages (32).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Swanson, 1995, Macropinocytosis, Trends Cell Biol, 5, 10.1016/S0962-8924(00)89101-1 · DOI
  2. Kerr, 2009, Defining Macropinocytosis, Traffic, 10, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2009.00878.x · DOI
  3. Sallusto, 1995, Dendritic Cells Use Macropinocytosis and the Mannose Receptor to Concentrate Macromolecules in the Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Compartment: Downregulation by Cytokines and Bacterial Products, J Exp Med, 182, 389, 10.1084/jem.182.2.389 · DOI
  4. Commisso, 2013, Macropinocytosis of Protein is an Amino Acid Supply Route in Ras-Transformed Cells, Nature, 497, 10.1038/nature12138 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Zeineddine, 2015, The Role of Macropinocytosis in the Propagation of Protein Aggregation Associated With Neurodegenerative Diseases, Front Physiol, 6, 10.3389/fphys.2015.00277 · DOI
  6. Mercer, 2009, Virus Entry by Macropinocytosis, Nat Cell Biol, 11, 10.1038/ncb0509-510 · DOI
  7. Araki, 2007, Phosphoinositide Metabolism During Membrane Ruffling and Macropinosome Formation in EGF-Stimulated A431 Cells, Exp Cell Res, 313, 10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.02.012 · DOI
  8. Egami, 2014, Small GTPases and Phosphoinositides in the Regulatory Mechanisms of Macropinosome Formation and Maturation, Front Physiol, 5, 10.3389/fphys.2014.00374 · DOI
  9. Stenmark, 2009, Rab GTPases as Coordinators of Vesicle Traffic, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 10, 10.1038/nrm2728 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Pfeffer, 2004, Targeting Rab GTPases to Distinct Membrane Compartments, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 5, 10.1038/nrm1500 · DOI
  11. Babbey, 2006, Rab10 Regulates Membrane Transport Through Early Endosomes of Polarized Madin-Darby Canine Kidney Cells, Mol Biol Cell, 17, 10.1091/mbc.E05-08-0799 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Chua, 2018, Rab 10—A Traffic Controller in Multiple Cellular Pathways and Locations, J Cell Physiol, 233, 10.1002/jcp.26503 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Sano, 2007, Rab10, a Target of the AS160 Rab GAP, is Required for Insulin-Stimulated Translocation of GLUT4 to the Adipocyte Plasma Membrane, Cell Metab, 5, 293, 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Shi, 2012, Rab-10-GTPase-mediated Regulation of Endosomal Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-Bisphosphate, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 109, 10.1073/pnas.1205278109 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Wang, 2010, Ras-Related Protein Rab10 Facilitates TLR4 Signaling by Promoting Replenishment of TLR4 Onto the Plasma Membrane, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 107, 10.1073/pnas.1009428107 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Cardoso, 2010, Rab10 Regulates Phagosome Maturation and its Overexpression Rescues Mycobacterium-Containing Phagosomes Maturation, Traffic, 11, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2009.01013.x · DOI
  17. Etoh, 2019, Rab10 Regulates Tubular Endosome Formation Through KIF13A and KIF13B Motors, J Cell Sci, 132, jcs236977, 10.1242/jcs.226977 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Araki, 2014, Development of an Automated Fluorescence Microscopy System for Photomanipulation of Genetically Encoded Photoactivatable Proteins (Optogenetics) in Live Cells, Microscopy, 63, 10.1093/jmicro/dfu003 · DOI
  19. Wu, 2009, A Genetically Encoded Photoactivatable Rac Controls the Motility of Living Cells, Nature, 461, 10.1038/nature08241 · DOI
  20. Shi, 2010, EHBP-1 Functions With RAB-10 During Endocytic Recycling in Caenorhabditis Elegans, Mol Biol Cell, 21, 10.1091/mbc.E10-02-0149 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Wang, 2016, Rab-10 Promotes EHBP-1 Bridging of Filamentous Actin and Tubular Recycling Endosomes, PloS Genet, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006093 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Lee, 2015, Transport Through Recycling Endosomes Requires EHD1 Recruitment by a Phosphatidylserine Translocase, EMBO J, 34, 10.15252/embj.201489703 · DOI
  23. Sharma, 2010, Mical-L1, Commun Integr Biol, 3, 10.4161/cib.3.2.10845 · DOI
  24. Sharma, 2009, Mical-L1 Links EHD1 to Tubular Recycling Endosomes and Regulates Receptor Recycling, Mol Biol Cell, 20, 10.1091/mbc.E09-06-0535 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Pfeffer, 2003, Membrane Domains in the Secretory and Endocytic Pathways, Cell, 112, 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00118-1 · DOI
  26. Zerial, 2001, Rab Proteins as Membrane Organizers, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2, 10.1038/35052055 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Buckley, 2017, Drinking Problems: Mechanisms of Macropinosome Formation and Maturation, FEBS J, 284, 10.1111/febs.14115 · DOI
  28. Kerr, 2006, Visualisation of Macropinosome Maturation by the Recruitment of Sorting Nexins, J Cell Sci, 119, 10.1242/jcs.03167 · DOI
  29. Lim, 2012, SNX5 is Essential for Efficient Macropinocytosis and Antigen Processing in Primary Macrophages, Biol Open, 1, 10.1242/bio.20122204 · DOI
  30. Kawai, 2020, Rab35 Targeting to the Plasma Membrane is Dependent on the C-Terminal Polybasic Cluster, Acta Histochem Cytochem, 53, 10.1267/ahc.20-00006 · DOI
  31. Cox, 1999, A Requirement for Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase in Pseudopod Extension, J Biol Chem, 274, 10.1074/jbc.274.3.1240 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Grant, 2009, Pathways and Mechanisms of Endocytic Recycling, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 10, 597, 10.1038/nrm2755 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Lucken-Ardjomande Häsler, 2020, GRAF2, WDR44, and MICAL1 Mediate Rab8/10/11–dependent Export of E-cadherin, MMP14, and CFTR Δf508, J Cell Biol, 219, e201811014, 10.1083/jcb.201811014 · DOI
  34. Chen, 2012, Rab10 and Myosin-Va Mediate Insulin-Stimulated GLUT4 Storage Vesicle Translocation in Adipocytes, J Cell Biol, 198, 10.1083/jcb.201111091 · DOI
  35. Wall, 2017, Small GTPase Rab8a-Recruited Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase γ Regulates Signaling and Cytokine Outputs From Endosomal Toll-Like Receptors, J Biol Chem, 292, 10.1074/jbc.M116.766337 · DOI
  36. Wall, 2019, Rab8a Localisation and Activation by Toll-Like Receptors on Macrophage Macropinosomes, Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci, 374, 20180151, 10.1098/rstb.2018.0151 · DOI
  37. Yoshida, 2009, Sequential Signaling in Plasma-Membrane Domains During Macropinosome Formation in Macrophages, J Cell Sci, 122, 10.1242/jcs.053207 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kawai, K., Nishigaki, A., Moriya, S., Egami, Y., & Araki, N.
Venue
Frontiers in Immunology
Published
2021-05-31
Volume
12
ISSN
1664-3224
Cited by
9
References
3
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review