The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rab 10—a traffic controller in multiple cellular pathways and locations
Abstract
Rab GTPases are key regulators of eukaryotic membrane traffic, and their functions and activities are limited to particular intracellular transport steps and their membrane localization is by and large restricted. Some Rabs do participate in more than one transport steps, but broadly speaking, there is a clear demarcation between exocytic and endocytic Rabs. One Rab protein, Rab10, however, appears to be anomalous in this regard and has a diverse array of functions and subcellular localizations. Rab10 has been implicated in a myriad of activities ranging from polarized exocytosis and endosomal sorting in polarized cells, insulin‐dependent Glut4 transport in adipocytes, axonal growth in neurons, and endo‐phagocytic processes in macrophages. It's reported subcellular localizations include the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), Golgi/TGN, the endosomes/phagosomes and the primary cilia. In this review, we summarize and discuss the multitude of known roles of Rab10 in cellular membrane transport and the molecular players and mechanisms associated with these roles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
RAB10 modulates a variety of membrane trafficking events including exocytic polarized targeting and endocytic recycling, and can perform functions partially redundant with RAB8A.
“RAB10 has been described to modulate a variety of membrane trafficking events including exocytic polarized targeting and endocytic recycling events [41], and can perform functions partially redundant with those of RAB8A [42,43,44,45].”
From Distinct Roles for RAB10 and RAB29 in Pathogenic LRRK2-Mediated Endolysosomal Trafficking Alterations (2020) · cites this paper as [41]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rab GTPases as coordinators of vesicle traffic
Stenmark, H. (2009) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2728 · Cited by 3,413
Nachury, M. V., Loktev, A. V., Zhang, Q., Westlake, C. J., Peränen, J., Merdes, A., Slusarski, D. C., Scheller, R. H., Bazan, J. F., Sheffield, V. C., et al. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.053 · Cited by 1,384
Hildebrandt, F., Benzing, T., & Katsanis, N. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1010172 · Cited by 1,331
TBC proteins: GAPs for mammalian small GTPase Rab?
Fukuda, M. (2011) · Bioscience Reports · doi:10.1042/bsr20100112 · Cited by 207
RAB10 overexpression promotes tumor growth and indicates poor prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma
Wang, W., Jia, W.-D., Hu, B., & Pan, Y.-Y. (2017) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.15507 · Cited by 59
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 131
- 10.1083/jcb.201105019 · DOI
- Aloisi A. L., 2013, Rab GTPases‐cargo direct interactions: Fine modulators of intracellular trafficking, Histology and Histopathology, 28, 839
- 10.1038/cdd.2013.187 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1083/jcb.200701139 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.E05-08-0799 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1152/ajprenal.00198.2010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ceb.2010.04.007 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.201209113 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mcn.2011.04.003 · DOI
- 10.1038/35057024 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2010.09.015 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.283.5409.1931 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M115.694919 · DOI
- 10.3389/fncel.2015.00407 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.201509052 · DOI
- 10.1074/mcp.M700155-MCP200 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2009.01013.x · DOI
- 10.1038/ncb2682 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.10.12.6578 · DOI
- 10.4161/cib.23779 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.90.14.6508 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.07.007 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M114.548321 · DOI
- 10.1111/jcmm.12403 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00018-011-0748-9 · DOI
- 10.1128/IAI.01020-07 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2012.01397.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1242/jcs.021808 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.12.012 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4496-13.2014 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4161/sgtp.24396 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002217 · DOI
- 10.1242/jcs.101378 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.201511093 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncb2647 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cub.2009.08.029 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M111.333245 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cellsig.2010.05.010 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.201403026 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-62703-791-4_1 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00018-005-4486-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.04.009 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1712176114 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1042/BST20120169 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2012.01353.x · DOI
- 10.1111/cmi.12256 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1042/BST0391202 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01468.x · DOI
- 10.1152/physrev.00059.2009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.06.009 · DOI
- 10.1152/ajpcell.00277.2008 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.151.3.627 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tem.2017.05.002 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.E14-06-1060 · DOI
- 10.1186/1741-7007-10-71 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1002401107 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M503897200 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0968-0004(97)01150-X · DOI
- 10.1006/excr.1997.3917 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.12.005 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.E07-02-0172 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.1601470 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.04.036 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005514 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms3005 · DOI
- 10.1007/s13238-015-0150-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1042/BJ20050887 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1083/jcb.200110081 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.R110.217067 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.06.004 · DOI
- 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00157 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.07.076 · DOI
- 10.1042/BST0340683 · DOI
- 10.1515/hsz-2013-0258 · DOI
- 10.1042/BST20120158 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.200201003 · DOI
- 10.1242/jcs.02401 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.135.1.153 · DOI
- 10.1042/BST20120168 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ceb.2013.04.002 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.270.29.17057 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrn2593 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0022931 · DOI
- 10.15252/embj.201591481 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00421-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2005.06.043 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0906536106 · DOI
- 10.1002/jnr.1253 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1010754108 · DOI
- 10.1128/IAI.71.10.5855-5870.2003 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.E13-02-0103 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.exppara.2005.02.021 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.C300063200 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.08.069 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1042/BJ20071318 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1203306109 · DOI
- 10.1093/jb/mvj104 · DOI
- 10.1242/jcs.136903 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2006.00506.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.semcdb.2010.09.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ceb.2004.06.014 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.271.7.3692 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chom.2013.08.010 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.E10-02-0149 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1205278109 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1042/BST20140283 · DOI
- 10.1242/jcs.097063 · DOI
- 10.1111/tra.12000 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1009523107 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2007.11.011 · DOI
- 10.1615/CritRevEukaryotGeneExpr.2015013572 · DOI
- 10.1111/cmi.12500 · DOI
- 10.2337/db15-1128 · DOI
- 10.1210/er.2014-1100 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0409716102 · DOI
- 10.1080/21541248.2016.1235004 · DOI
- 10.1111/jnc.12676 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2005.11.047 · DOI
- 10.18632/oncotarget.19571 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006093 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.07.007 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1009428107 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.aaa4903 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.147.4.743 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001438 · DOI
- 10.1038/cr.2014.33 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.200703047 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.201008051 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/MCB.02298-06 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005484 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
RAB10: an Alzheimer’s disease resilience locus and potential drug target
Tavana, J., Rosene, M., Jensen, N., Ridge, P. G., Kauwe, J. S. K., & Karch, C. M. (2018) · Clinical Interventions in Aging · doi:10.2147/cia.s159148 · Cited by 62
Rivero-Ríos, P., Romo-Lozano, M., Fernández, B., Fdez, E., & Hilfiker, S. (2020) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells9071719 · Cited by 38
Khan, T. G., Ginsburg, D., & Emmer, B. T. (2022) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/j.jlr.2022.100248 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Chua, C. E. L., & Tang, B. L.
- Affiliations
- Singapore Nuclear Research and Safety Initiative National University of Singapore Singapore
- Department of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine National University of Singapore Singapore
- ORCID
- Tang, Bor L.
- Venue
- Journal of Cellular Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-03-25
- Volume
- 233
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 6483-6494
- ISSN
- 0021-9541
- 1097-4652
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
- Licence
- Funders
- NUS Graduate School for Integrative Sciences and Engineering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review