Cited by 5Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringAdvanced MEMS and NEMS TechnologiesAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design

Design and Microfabrication Considerations for Reliable Flexible Intracortical Implants

Open access
Sohal, Harbaljit S., Vassilevski, Konstantin, Jackson, Andrew, Baker, Stuart N., O’Neill, Anthony·2016·Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering

Abstract

Current microelectrodes designed to record chronic neural activity suffer from recording instabilities due to the modulus mismatch between the electrode materials and the brain. We sought to address this by microfabricating a novel flexible neural probe. Our probe was fabricated from parylene-C with a WTi metal, using contact photolithography and reactive ion etching, with three design features to address this modulus mismatch: a sinusoidal shaft, a rounded tip and a polyimide anchoring ball. The anchor restricts movement of the electrode recording sites and the shaft accommodates the brain motion. We successfully patterned thick metal and parylene-C layers, with a reliable device release process leading to high functional yield. This novel reliably microfabricated probe can record stable neural activity for up to two years without delamination, surpassing the current state-of-the-art intracortical probes. This challenges recent concerns that have been raised over the long-term reliability of chronic implants when Parylene-C is used as an insulator, for both research and human applications The microfabrication and design considerations provided in this manuscript may aid future development of flexible devices for biomedical applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmech.2016.00005

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sohal, H. S., Vassilevski, K., Jackson, A., Baker, S. N., & O’Neill, A.
Affiliations
  • MIT Media Lab (US)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Sohal, Harbaljit S.
Venue
Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering
Published
2016-06-27
Volume
2
ISSN
2297-3079 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2198514740
Cited by
4
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Keywords
flexible neural probes, intracortical microelectrodes, Parylene C, modulus mismatch, chronic neural recording, recording stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review