Cited by 641Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 162 of the 163 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Role of Ciliate Protozoa in the Rumen

Open access
Newbold, Charles J., de la Fuente, Gabriel, Belanche, Alejandro, Ramos-Morales, Eva, McEwan, Neil R.·2015·Frontiers in Microbiology

Abstract

First described in 1843, Rumen protozoa with their striking appearance were assumed to be important for the welfare of their host. However, despite contributing up to 50% of the bio-mass in the rumen, the role of protozoa in rumen microbial ecosystem remains unclear. Phylogenetic analysis of 18S rDNA libraries generated from the rumen of cattle, sheep, and goats has revealed an unexpected diversity of ciliated protozoa although variation in gene copy number between species makes it difficult to obtain absolute quantification. Despite repeated attempts it has proven impossible to maintain rumen protozoa in axenic culture. Thus it has been difficult to establish conclusively a role of ciliate protozoa in rumen fiber degradation. The development of techniques to clone and express ciliate genes in λ phage, together with bioinformatic indices to confirm the ciliate origin of the genes has allowed the isolation and characterization of fibrolytic genes from rumen protozoa. Elimination of the ciliate protozoa increases microbial protein supply by up to 30% and reduces methane production by up to 11%. Our recent findings suggest that holotrich protozoa play a disproportionate role in supporting methanogenesis whilst the small Entodinium are responsible for much of the bacterial protein turnover. As yet no method to control protozoa in the rumen that is safe and practically applicable has been developed, however a range of plant extract capable of controlling if not completely eliminating rumen protozoa have been described.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01313

Cites

162 of 162 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

FIGURE 1 Meta-analysis describing the effects of defaunation on rumen function. For each parameter information is provided about the number of studies, observations (n), and range of values. Graph shows the mean effects and 95% confidential intervals. Values below one indicate a negative effect, while those above one indicate a positive effect of defaunation on that particular parameter.
FIGURE 1 Meta-analysis describing the effects of defaunation on rumen function. For each parameter information is provided about the number of studies, observations (n), and range of values. Graph shows the mean effects and 95% confidential intervals. Values below one indicate a negative effect, while those above one indicate a positive effect of defaunation on that particular parameter.CC BY · PubMed Central
FIGURE 2 Meta-analysis describing the effects of defaunation animal performance. For each parameter information is provided about the number of studies, observations (n), and range of values. Graph shows the mean effects and 95% confidential intervals. Values below one indicate a negative effect, while those above one indicate a positive effect of defaunation on that particular parameter.
FIGURE 2 Meta-analysis describing the effects of defaunation animal performance. For each parameter information is provided about the number of studies, observations (n), and range of values. Graph shows the mean effects and 95% confidential intervals. Values below one indicate a negative effect, while those above one indicate a positive effect of defaunation on that particular parameter.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Dehority, 1993, Laboratory Manual for Classification and Morphology of Ruminal Ciliate Protozoa
  2. Dogiel, 1927, Monographie der familie Ophryoscolecidae, Arch. Protistenkunde, 59, 1
  3. Frumholtz, 1991, Manipulation of the Rumen Fermentation and its Effect on Digestive Physiology
  4. Gruby, 1843, Recherches sur des animalcules se développant en grand nombre dans l’estomac et dans les intestins, pendant la digestion des animaux herbivores et carnivores, Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci., 17, 1304
  5. Kofoid, 1930, Ciliates from Bos indicus Linn. I. The genus Entodinium. Stein, Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool., 33, 471
  6. Kofoid, 1932, Ciliates from Bos indicus Linn II. A revision of Diplodinium Schuberg, Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool., 37, 53
  7. Kofoid, 1933, Ciliates from Bos indicus Linn III. Epidinium Crawley. Epiplastron gen. nov., and Ophryoscolex Stein, Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool., 39, 1
  8. Latteur, 1968, Revision systematique de la Famille des Ophryoscolescidae Stein, 1858: sous-famille Entodiniinae Lubinsky, 1957. Genre Entodinium Stein, 1858, Ann. Soc. R. Zool. de Belgique, 98, 1
  9. Latteur, 1969, Revision systematique de la famille des Ophryoscolecidae Stein, 1858: sous-famille Entodiniinae Lubinsky, 1957. Genre Entodinium Stein, 1958, Ann. Soc. R. Zool. de Belgique, 99, 3
  10. Latteur, 1970, Revision Systematique de la Famille des Ophryoscolecidae Stein, 1858: sous-famille des Diplodiniinae Lubinsky, 1957. Genre Diplodinium (Schuberg, 1888) sensu novo, Ann. Soc. R. Zool. de Belgique, 100, 275
  11. Ramos-Morales, 2014, “In vitro effect of the combination of Ivy fruit refined extract and a glucosidase inhibitor on rumen fermentation and protozoa activity,”, p 116

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 641

Metadata

Authors
Newbold, C. J., de la Fuente, G., Belanche, A., Ramos-Morales, E., & McEwan, N. R.
Affiliations
Aberystwyth University (GB)
Corresponding author
Newbold, Charles J.
Venue
Frontiers in Microbiology
Published
2015-11-26
Volume
6
Pages
1313-1313
ISSN
1664-302X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2177858583
Cited by
637
References
163
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UdL Open Repository (University of Lleida) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Access Institutional Repository at Robert Gordon University (Robert Gordon University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Open Access Institutional Repository at Robert Gordon University (Robert Gordon University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/J0013/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
rumen ciliate protozoa, rumen microbiota, 18S rDNA phylogeny, Entodinium, methanogenesis, methane mitigation, microbial protein supply, plant extracts, cattle, sheep, goats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review