Cited by 196Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

The rewarding nature of social interactions.

Open access
Krach, Sören·2010·Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

The objective of this short review is to highlight rewarding aspects of social interactions for humans and discuss their neural basis. Thereby we report recent research findings to illustrate how social stimuli in general are processed in the reward system and highlight the role of Theory of Mind as one mediating process for experiencing social reward during social interactions. In conclusion we discuss clinical implications for psychiatry and psychotherapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00022

Cites

36 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social interaction, digital or not, activates the dopaminergic reward circuits in the basal ganglia.

    “Social interaction (digital or not) activates the dopaminergic reward circuits in the basal ganglia”

    From Hypernatural Monitoring: A Social Rehearsal Account of Smartphone Addiction (2018) · cites this paper as Krach et al., 2010

    In “The Rewarding Character of Social Stimuli” (page unavailable), the paper says dopaminergic reward circuits in the basal ganglia process rewarding social stimuli. It does not establish that digital interactions activate those circuits, and it cautions that social interactions are not inherently rewarding; their reward value depends on context and interpretation. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krach, S.
Affiliations
Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Krach, Sören
Venue
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2010
Volume
4
Pages
22-22
ISSN
1662-5153 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987598380
Cited by
196
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
social reward, social interaction, reward systems, theory of mind, psychotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review