Cited by 85Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive Functions and Memory

Plasticity of Executive Control through Task Switching Training in Adolescents

Open access
Zinke, Katharina, Einert, Manuela, Pfennig, Lydia, Kliegel, Matthias·2012·Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Abstract

Research has shown that cognitive training can enhance performance in executive control tasks. The current study was designed to explore if executive control, specifically task switching, can be trained in adolescents, what particular aspects of executive control may underlie training and transfer effects, and if acute bouts of exercise directly prior to cognitive training enhance training effects. For that purpose, a task switching training was employed that has been shown to be effective in other age groups. A group of adolescents (10-14 years, n = 20) that received a three-session task switching training was compared to a group (n = 20) that received the same task switching training but who exercised on a stationary bike before each training session. Additionally, a no-contact and an exercise only control group were included (both ns = 20). Analyses indicated that both training groups significantly reduced their switching costs over the course of the training sessions for reaction times and error rates, respectively. Analyses indicated transfer to mixing costs in a task switching task that was similar to the one used in training. Far transfer was limited to a choice reaction time task and a tendency for faster reaction times in an updating task. Analyses revealed no additional effects of the exercise intervention. Findings thus indicate that executive control can be enhanced in adolescents through training and that updating may be of particular relevance for the effects of task switching training.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00041

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In adolescents aged 10-14 years, three sessions of task-switching training yielded performance benefits on an untrained switching task (near transfer) and in terms of choice reaction time and updating, but not inhibition (far transfer), without additional benefits of the acute boosts of exercise before training.

    “Interestingly, three sessions of task-switching training yielded performance benefits on an untrained switching task (near transfer) and in terms of choice reaction time and updating, but not inhibition (far transfer), without additional benefits of the acute boosts of exercise before training.”

    From Executive control training from middle childhood to adolescence (2014) · cites this paper as Zinke et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Kray J. Lindenberger U. (2000). Adult age differences in task switching. Psychol. Aging 15, 126– 147 10.1037/0882-7974.15.1.126 10755295 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Norman W. Shallice T. (1986). “Attention to action,” in Consciousness and Self Regulation: Advances in Research and Theory, Vol. 4, eds Davidson R. J. Schwartz G. E. Shapiro D. (New York: Plenum), 1– 18
  3. Snodgrass J. Vanderwart M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Learn. 6, 174– 215 10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174 7373248 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zinke, K., Einert, M., Pfennig, L., & Kliegel, M.
Affiliations
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Zinke, Katharina
Venue
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2012
Volume
6
Pages
41-41
ISSN
1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047543742
Cited by
85
References
59
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
executive function, cognitive training, adolescents, transfer effects, far transfer, working memory updating, switching costs, physical activity, stationary cycling, cognitive flexibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review