Cited by 65Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringVisual perception and processing mechanismsNeural dynamics and brain function

Consistent phosphenes generated by electrical microstimulation of the visual thalamus. An experimental approach for thalamic visual neuroprostheses

Open access
Panetsos, Fivos, Sanchez-Jimenez, Abel, Cerio, Elena Diaz-de, Diaz-Guemes, Idoia, Sanchez, Francisco M.·2011·Frontiers in Neuroscience

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Most work on visual prostheses has centered on developing retinal or cortical devices. However, when retinal implants are not feasible, neuroprostheses could be implanted in the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) of the thalamus, the intermediate relay station of visual information from the retina to the visual cortex (V1). The objective of the present study was to determine the types of artificial stimuli that when delivered to the visual thalamus can generate reliable responses of the cortical neurons similar to those obtained when the eye perceives a visual image. Visual stimuli {S(i)} were presented to one eye of an experimental animal and both, the thalamic {RTh(i)} and cortical responses {RV1(i)} to such stimuli were recorded. Electrical patterns {RTh(i)*} resembling {RTh(i)} were then injected into the visual thalamus to obtain cortical responses {RV1(i)*} similar to {RV1(i)}. Visually- and electrically generated V1 responses were compared. RESULTS: During the course of this work we: (i) characterized the response of V1 neurons to visual stimuli according to response magnitude, duration, spiking rate, and the distribution of interspike intervals; (ii) experimentally tested the dependence of V1 responses on stimulation parameters such as intensity, frequency, duration, etc., and determined the ranges of these parameters generating the desired cortical activity; (iii) identified similarities between responses of V1 useful to compare the naturally and artificially generated neuronal activity of V1; and (iv) by modifying the stimulation parameters, we generated artificial V1 responses similar to those elicited by visual stimuli. Generation of predictable and consistent phosphenes by means of artificial stimulation of the LGN is important for the feasibility of visual prostheses. Here we proved that electrical stimuli to the LGN can generate V1 neural responses that resemble those elicited by natural visual stimuli.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnins.2011.00084

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In animals, LGN microstimulation produced simple discrete visual percepts and visual cortical responses similar to those elicited by natural vision.

    “In animals, LGN microstimulation produced simple discrete visual percepts [81] and visual cortical responses similar to those elicited by natural vision [82].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Dowling J. (1979). “Information processing by local circuits: the vertebrate retina as a model system,” in The Neurosciences Fourth Study Program, eds Schmitt F. O. Worden F. G. (Cambridge: MIT press), 163– 181.
  2. Mason C. Kandel E. R. (1991). “Central visual pahtways,” in Principles of Neural Science, eds Kandel E. R. Schwartz J. H. Jessell T. M. (New York: Elsevier), 421– 439.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Panetsos, F., Sanchez-Jimenez, A., Cerio, E. D.-D., Diaz-Guemes, I., & Sanchez, F. M.
Affiliations
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Corresponding author
Panetsos, Fivos
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2011
Volume
5
Pages
666602-666602
ISSN
  • 1662-453X (ISSN-L)
  • 1662-4548
OpenAlex
W2027961941
Cited by
65
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
visual prosthesis, lateral geniculate nucleus, electrical microstimulation, phosphenes, primary visual cortex, stimulation parameters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review