Cited by 195Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringVisual perception and processing mechanismsTactile and Sensory Interactions

Demonstration of artificial visual percepts generated through thalamic microstimulation

Open access
Pezaris, John S., Reid, R. Clay·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Electrical stimulation of the visual system might serve as the foundation for a prosthetic device for the blind. We examined whether microstimulation of the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the thalamus can generate localized visual percepts in alert monkeys. To assess electrically generated percepts, an eye-movement task was used with targets presented on a computer screen (optically) or through microstimulation of the lateral geniculate nucleus (electrically). Saccades (fast, direct eye movements) made to electrical targets were comparable to saccades made to optical targets. Gaze locations for electrical targets were well predicted by measured visual response maps of cells at the electrode tips. With two electrodes, two distinct targets could be independently created. A sequential saccade task verified that electrical targets were processed not in motor coordinates, but in visual spatial coordinates. Microstimulation produced predictable visual percepts, showing that this technique may be useful for a visual prosthesis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0608563104

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In previous NHP research, reliable phosphene thresholds could be obtained with stimulation of the LGN, V1, V2, V3A, and MT.

    “In previous NHP research, reliable phosphene thresholds could be obtained with the stimulation of the LGN, V1, V2, V3A, and middle temporal visual area (MT) (Pezaris and Reid, 2007; Murphey and Maunsell, 2007).”

    From Towards biologically plausible phosphene simulation for the differentiable optimization of visual cortical prostheses (2024) · cites this paper as Pezaris and Reid, 2007

    The Results report stimulation thresholds for eliciting saccades in monkeys, and the Discussion interprets LGN-evoked responses as evidence of visual percepts. The paper does not establish reliable phosphene thresholds across all the listed areas: it reports its own LGN results and discusses prior V1 work, but does not establish the claim for V2, V3A, or MT. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Using eye movements as a marker for the perceived location has been demonstrated in behaving animals.

    “Such a method has been demonstrated in behaving animals [28,29].”
  • In animals, LGN microstimulation produced simple discrete visual percepts and visual cortical responses similar to those elicited by natural vision.

    “In animals, LGN microstimulation produced simple discrete visual percepts [81] and visual cortical responses similar to those elicited by natural vision [82].”
  • So far, there have been very few preclinical studies in animals conducted to test the stimulation efficacy of LGN prostheses.

    “So far, there have been very few preclinical studies in animals conducted to test the stimulation efficacy [81,83,84].”
  • A common approach is to use bipolar stimulation through two close electrodes, as shown in retinal, optic nerve, and thalamic prostheses.

    “A common approach is to use bipolar stimulation through two close electrodes, as shown in retinal [36,143,144], optic nerve [75], and thalamic prostheses [81].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [1]Rizzo JF, Wyatt J. Neuroscientist. 1997;3:251–262. [Google Scholar]
  2. [2]Liu W, McGucken E, Vichienchom K, Clements SM, Demarco SC, Humayun M, de Juan E, Weiland J, Greenberg R. Proc IEEE Int Conf Systems Man Cybernet; 1999. pp. 364–369. [Google Scholar]
  3. [18]Erwin E, Baker FH, Busen WF, Malpeli JG. J Comp Neurol. 1999;407:92–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pezaris, J. S., & Reid, R. C.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-05
Volume
104
Issue
18
Pages
7670-7675
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1989630635
Cited by
195
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Eye Institute (R01 EY12815, R01EY012815)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus, visual percepts, visual prosthesis, blindness, saccade eye movements, monkeys
MeSH terms
Animals, Artificial Organs, Electrodes, Electrophysiology, Female, Macaca, Male, Thalamus, Visual Perception, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review