Cited by 100Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionCultural Differences and ValuesSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Two Types of Value-Affirmation: Implications for Self-Control Following Social Exclusion

Burson, Aleah, Crocker, Jennifer, Mischkowski, Dominik·2012·Social Psychological and Personality Science

Abstract

The authors tested the hypothesis that affirming self-transcendent values attenuates negative consequences of self-threat better than affirming self-enhancement values. If value-affirmation buffers against threat because it bolsters the self, then affirming either a self-transcendent or self-enhancement value should similarly prevent typical decreased self-control after exclusion. However, if value-affirmations buffer the effects of threat because they promote self-transcendence, then affirming values related to self-transcendence should provide a better buffer against decreased self-control after exclusion. Ninety-two undergraduate students received either intentional or unintentional social exclusion. Participants then affirmed either a self-transcendent or self-enhancement value, or wrote about their daily routine. Consistent with predictions, participants ate more cookies when they were intentionally rather than unintentionally excluded; this effect was attenuated by affirming an important value, especially a self-transcendent value. This suggests that value-affirmation may be a particularly effective method of coping with self-threats when it increases self-transcendence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1948550611427773

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research on affirmations demonstrates their value in increasing self-awareness, implementing associated behaviors, fostering self-control, and regulating stress.

    “Research on affirmations demonstrates their value in increasing self-awareness, implementing associated behaviors, fostering self-control, and regulating stress (Burson et al., 2012; Ferrer et al., 2012; Harris, 2011; Sherman, 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burson, A., Crocker, J., & Mischkowski, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Burson, Aleah
Venue
Social Psychological and Personality Science
Published
2012-02-01
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
510-516
ISSN
  • 1948-5506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-5514
OpenAlex
W2000027315
Cited by
100
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4
FWCI
9.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Psychological and Personality Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ohio State University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
values affirmation, self-transcendent values, self-enhancement values, self-threat, social exclusion, self-control, coping, dietary habits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review