The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inoculating Against Fake News About COVID-19
Open accessAbstract
The outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has been accompanied by a large amount of misleading and false information about the virus, especially on social media. In this article, we explore the coronavirus “infodemic” and how behavioral scientists may seek to address this problem. We detail the scope of the problem and discuss the negative influence that COVID-19 misinformation can have on the widespread adoption of health protective behaviors in the population. In response, we explore how insights from the behavioral sciences can be leveraged to manage an effective societal response to curb the spread of misinformation about the virus. In particular, we discuss the theory of psychological inoculation (or prebunking) as an efficient vehicle for conferring large-scale psychological resistance against fake news.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“46% of people in the UK and 48% of people in the United States were exposed to false information.”
From The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic (2022) · cites this paper as [242]
In the citing paper
“All countries proved to be highly vulnerable to disinformation and misinformation regarding the pandemic”
From The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic (2022) · cites this paper as [242]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The spread of true and false news online
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aap9559 · Cited by 8,847 · cited 1×
“One insight that has emerged is that fact-checks tend to spread slower on social media than misinformation (Vosoughi et al., 2018), making it difficult for fact-checking to be effective on its own.”
BackgroundThe proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2
Andersen, K. G., Rambaut, A., Lipkin, W. I., Holmes, E. C., & Garry, R. F. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0820-9 · Cited by 5,081 · cited 2×
“(World Health Organization, 2020a), to false conspiracy theories that the virus was bioengineered in a lab in Wuhan (Andersen et al., 2020; Cohen, 2020), or that the 5G cellular network is causing or exacerbating symptoms of COVID-19 (BBC News, 2020).”
BackgroundUsing social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response
Bavel, J. J. V., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Cikara, M., Crockett, M. J., Crum, A. J., Douglas, K. M., Druckman, J. N., et al. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z · Cited by 4,964
Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612451018 · Cited by 2,920
Zarocostas, J. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30461-x · Cited by 2,344 · cited 1×
“In fact, the spread of misleading information about the virus has led the World Health Organization (WHO) to warn of an on-going “infodemic” or an overabundance of information— especially misinformation—during an epidemic (World Health Organization, 2020b; Zarocostas, 2020).”
BackgroundRisk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world
Dryhurst, S., Schneider, C. R., Kerr, J. R., Freeman, A. L. J., Recchia, G. L., van der Bles, A. M., Spiegelhalter, D. J., & van der Linden, S. (2020) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2020.1758193 · Cited by 1,815
Observational Study of Hydroxychloroquine in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19
Geleris, J., Sun, Y., Platt, J., Zucker, J., Baldwin, M., Hripcsak, G., Labella, A., Manson, D. K., Kubin, C., Barr, R. G., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2012410 · Cited by 1,625
Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks
Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1618923114 · Cited by 1,580 · cited 1×
“, climate change or vaccination) to the manipulation techniques that underpin most fake news such as using emotional language (Brady et al., 2017), conspiratorial reasoning (Lewandowsky et al.”
BackgroundCoronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19)
Alowibdi, J. S., Alshdadi, A. A., Daud, A. Y., Dessouky, M. M., & Alhazmi, E. A. (2021) · International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems · doi:10.4018/ijswis.2021040101 · Cited by 1,530
Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world
Roozenbeek, J., Schneider, C. R., Dryhurst, S., Kerr, J., Freeman, A. L. J., Recchia, G., van der Bles, A. M., & van der Linden, S. (2020) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.201199 · Cited by 1,447
Self-citationPrior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news
Pennycook, G., Cannon, T. D., & Rand, D. G. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000465 · Cited by 1,268 · cited 1×
“In particular, amongst those exposed, nearly two-thirds (66%) reported seeing it on a daily basis, which is problematic as repeated exposure is known to increase belief in fake news (Pennycook et al., 2018).”
BackgroundThe pandemic of social media panic travels faster than the COVID-19 outbreak
Depoux, A., Martin, S., Karafillakis, E., Preet, R., Wilder-Smith, A., & Larson, H. (2020) · Journal of Travel Medicine · doi:10.1093/jtm/taaa031 · Cited by 1,068
Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate Change
van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., Rosenthal, S., & Maibach, E. (2017) · Global Challenges · doi:10.1002/gch2.201600008 · Cited by 1,058
Allcott, H., Boxell, L., Conway, J., Gentzkow, M., Thaler, M., & Yang, D. (2020) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104254 · Cited by 999 · cited 1×
“Similar analyses have been conducted in the United States in response to political polarization over COVID-19 preventative health behaviors (Allcott et al., 2020), highlighting the disruptive potential of high-profile misinformation for both individual and societal well-being.”
ResultCook, J., Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175799 · Cited by 971
YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation?
Li, H. O.-Y., Bailey, A., Huynh, D., & Chan, J. (2020) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002604 · Cited by 781
Guess, A. M., Lerner, M., Lyons, B., Montgomery, J. M., Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., & Sircar, N. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1920498117 · Cited by 773
Imhoff, R., & Lamberty, P. (2020) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550620934692 · Cited by 722
Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England
Freeman, D., Waite, F., Rosebrock, L., Petit, A., Causier, C., East, A., Jenner, L., Teale, A.-L., Carr, L., Mulhall, S., et al. (2022) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291720001890 · Cited by 714
Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation
Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2019) · Palgrave Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0279-9 · Cited by 708
Self-citationThe Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science
Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Oberauer, K. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075637 · Cited by 693 · cited 1×
“, 2017), conspiratorial reasoning (Lewandowsky et al., 2013; van der Linden, 2015) or impersonating experts online (Goga et al.”
BackgroundBode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2015) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12166 · Cited by 666 · cited 1×
“In addition, while media literacy initiatives are important and can be effective under the right conditions (Bode and Vraga, 2015; Guess et al., 2020; Van Bavel et al., 2020), they are often expensive to develop, slow to roll out, and reactive rather than proactive.”
BackgroundThe SAGE Handbook of Persuasion: Developments in Theory and Practice
Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2012) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781452218410 · Cited by 661
Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., & Tang, D. (2010) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.38.8.1087 · Cited by 519
Fact-checking as risk communication: the multi-layered risk of misinformation in times of COVID-19
Krause, N. M., Freiling, I., Beets, B., & Brossard, D. (2020) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2020.1756385 · Cited by 463 · cited 1×
“Indeed, misinformation about COVID19 can fundamentally distort people’s risk perception of the virus (Krause et al., 2020).”
BackgroundPrevention is better than cure: addressing anti-vaccine conspiracy theories
Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2017) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12453 · Cited by 446
Why do people believe COVID-19 conspiracy theories?
Uscinski, J. E., Enders, A. M., Klofstad, C., Seelig, M. I., Funchion, J., Everett, C., Wuchty, S., Premaratne, K., & Murthi, M. N. (2020) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-015 · Cited by 430
The fake news game: actively inoculating against the risk of misinformation
Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2019) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2018.1443491 · Cited by 422
Self-citationMcguire, W. (1964) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60052-0 · Cited by 415 · cited 3×
“The theory of psychological inoculation takes the historic practice of vaccination in medicine into the realm of resistance to persuasion (McGuire, 1964).”
BackgroundMcGuire, W. J. (1961) · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0048344 · Cited by 410 · cited 1×
“Actively Inoculating Against Misinformation Two further advances have been proposed in inoculation research that hold promise for the scalability and broad applicability of inoculation interventions, particularly in the context of misinformation: a renewed focus on active inoculations (McGuire and Papageorgis, 1961; R…”
Backgroundvan der Linden, S. (2015) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.045 · Cited by 391 · cited 1×
“…unwanted persuasion (e.g., climate change or vaccination) to the manipulation techniques that underpin most fake news such as using emotional language (Brady et al., 2017), conspiratorial reasoning (Lewandowsky et al., 2013; van der Linden, 2015) or impersonating experts online (Goga et al., 2015).”
BackgroundBasol, M., Roozenbeek, J., & Van der Linden, S. (2020) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.91 · Cited by 368
Self-citationPylons ablaze: Examining the role of 5G COVID‐19 conspiracy beliefs and support for violence
Jolley, D., & Paterson, J. (2020) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12394 · Cited by 337 · cited 1×
“In the United Kingdom alone, people have set fire to least 50 phone masts in response to the 5G conspiracy (BBC News, 2020) and research finds that belief in the 5G conspiracy is linked to violent intentions (Jolley and Paterson, 2020).”
BackgroundLong-term effectiveness of inoculation against misinformation: Three longitudinal experiments.
Maertens, R., Roozenbeek, J., Basol, M., & van der Linden, S. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000315 · Cited by 321
Self-citationTen considerations for effectively managing the COVID-19 transition
Habersaat, K. B., Betsch, C., Danchin, M. H., Sunstein, C. R., BOHM, R. M., Falk, A., Brewer, N. T., Omer, S. B., Scherzer, M., Sah, S., et al. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0906-x · Cited by 315
Effective strategies for rebutting science denialism in public discussions
Schmid, P., & Betsch, C. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0632-4 · Cited by 264
Roozenbeek, J., van der Linden, S., & Nygren, T. (2020) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016//mr-2020-008 · Cited by 246
Self-citationMaertens, R., Anseel, F., & van der Linden, S. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101455 · Cited by 185
Rethinking the role of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of COVID‐19
Meyerowitz, E. A., Vannier, A., Friesen, M. G. N., Schoenfeld, S. R., Gelfand, J. A., Callahan, M. V., Kim, A. Y., Reeves, P. M., & Poznansky, M. C. (2020) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.202000919 · Cited by 174 · cited 1×
“For example, although the harms and benefits of hydroxychloroquine as a potential treatment are indeed being studied, there is currently no scientific consensus on its effectiveness (Geleris et al., 2020; Meyerowitz et al., 2020).”
BackgroundPersuading Others to Avoid Persuasion: Inoculation Theory and Resistant Health Attitudes
Compton, J., Jackson, B., & Dimmock, J. A. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00122 · Cited by 170
Self-citationUse of inoculation to promote resistance to smoking initiation among adolescents
Pfau, M. W., Bockern, S. V., & Kang, J. G. (1992) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637759209376266 · Cited by 153
Inoculating Against Reactance to Persuasive Health Messages
Richards, A., & Banas, J. A. (2015) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2013.867005 · Cited by 139
Enriching the Inoculation Construct The Role of Critical Components in the Process of Resistance
Kyle, M., TUSING, J., Koerner, A. F., Lee, W., GODBOLD, L. C., Penaloza, L. J., SHU-HUEI, V., & HONG, Y. Y.-H. (1997) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1997.tb00413.x · Cited by 134
Miller, C. H., Ivanov, B., Sims, J. D., Compton, J., Harrison, K. J., Parker, K. A., Parker, J. L., & Averbeck, J. M. (2012) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01438.x · Cited by 132 · cited 1×
“, 2003), less psychological reactance against the inoculation-informed campaign (Richards and Banas, 2015), and more psychological reactance against attack messages (Miller et al., 2013).”
BackgroundSelf-citationProphylactic Versus Therapeutic Inoculation Treatments for Resistance to Influence
Compton, J. (2019) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1093/ct/qtz004 · Cited by 132 · cited 1×
“However, a more recent approach within inoculation theory expands its efficacy to also include a therapeutic application—inoculation treatments that target an unhealthy state (Compton, 2020).”
BackgroundSelf-citationOfficials gird for a war on vaccine misinformation
Cornwall, W. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.369.6499.14 · Cited by 119 · cited 1×
“These effects are problematic because at present polls show that only 50% of Americans are willing to get a potential vaccine if one becomes available, which undermines the potential for herd immunity against the coronavirus (Cornwall, 2020).”
BackgroundPfau, M. W., Ivanov, B., Houston, B., Haigh, M. M., Sims, J. D., Gilchrist, E. S., Russell, J., Wigley, S. L., Eckstein, J., & Richert, N. (2005) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637750500322578 · Cited by 104
Parker, K. A., Ivanov, B., & Compton, J. (2011) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.575541 · Cited by 102
Self-citationThe Persistence of Inoculation in Conferring Resistance to Smoking Initiation Among Adolescents
Pfau, M. W., & Bockern, S. V. (1994) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00329.x · Cited by 94 · cited 1×
“The inoculation effect itself can last for months (Pfau and Bockern, 1994), including with regular “top-ups” or “booster shots” following gameplay (Maertens et al.”
BackgroundPsychological Inoculation Against Fake News
van der Linden, S., & Roozenbeek, J. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429295379-11 · Cited by 89
Self-citationRoozenbeek, J., Maertens, R., McClanahan, W., & van der Linden, S. (2021) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164420940378 · Cited by 80
Self-citationMore than Words: Leaders' Speech and Risky Behavior During a PandemicPreprint
Ajzenman, N., Cavalcanti, T. V. D. V., & Mata, D. D. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.17863/cam.57994 · Cited by 78
Banas, J. A., & Richards, A. (2017) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637751.2017.1307999 · Cited by 75
Goga, O., Venkatadri, G., & Gummadi, K. P. (2015) · ACM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC) · doi:10.1145/2815675.2815699 · Cited by 60
Attitude Accessibility as an Alternative Explanation for How Inoculation Confers Resistance
Pfau, M. W., Roskos‐Ewoldsen, D. R., Wood, M. L. M., Yin, S., Cho, J., Lu, K.-H., & Shen, L. (2003) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/715114663 · Cited by 59 · cited 1×
“, 2006), increased attitude accessibility (Pfau et al., 2003), less psychological reactance against the inoculation-informed campaign (Richards and Banas, 2015), and more psychological reactance against attack messages (Miller et al.”
BackgroundPfau, M. W., Compton, J., Parker, K. A., An, C., Wittenberg-Lyles, E. M., Ferguson, M. L., Horton, H., & Malyshev, Y. (2006) · Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01463370600650845 · Cited by 51
Self-citationvan der Linden, S. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0631-5 · Cited by 29 · cited 2×
“…tool, more work is needed to curb the spread of misinformation about COVID-19, including a multi-layered defense system against “post-truth” science denial (van der Linden, 2019) which will include effective debunking and real-time rebuttal in addition to inoculation (Schmid and Betsch, 2019).”
BackgroundDimmock, J. A., Gagné, M., Proud, L., Howle, T. C., Rebar, A. L., & Jackson, B. (2016) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.2016-0146 · Cited by 13
Wong, N. C. H. (2014) · Journal of Womens Health Issues and Care · doi:10.4172/2325-9795.1000170 · Cited by 11 · cited 1×
“More recently, inoculation work has explored ways of enhancing beneficial health behaviors, like committing to exercise programs (Dimmock et al., 2016) or strengthening vaccination intentions (Wong and Harrison, 2014), especially in response to conspiracy theories (Jolley and Douglas, 2017).”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Carlsson, 2019, Understanding Media and Information Literacy MIL) in the Digital Age: A Question of Democracy.
- Cohen, 2020, Scientists “Strongly Condemn” Rumors and Conspiracy theories about Origin of Coronavirus Outbreak. Science Magazine.
- Constine, 2020, Facebook Deletes Brazil President’s Coronavirus Misinfo Post. Tech Crunch.
- Cook, 2020, Coronavirus, “Plandemic” and the Seven Traits of Conspiratorial Thinking. The Conversation.
- Mitchell, 2020, Americans Immersed in COVID-19 News; Most Think Media Are Doing Fairly Well Covering It. Pew Research Center.
- 2020, Half of UK Adults Exposed to False Claims about Coronavirus.
- Sanders, 2020, The Difference between What Republicans and Democrats Believe to be True about COVID-19. YouGov.
- Scott, 2020, Facebook’s Private Groups are Abuzz with Coronavirus Fake News. Politico.
- Spring, 2020, Coronavirus: The Human Cost of Virus Misinformation. BBC News.
- Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) advice for the public: Mythbusters.
- Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Situation Report - 13.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic
Sachs, J. D., Karim, S. S. A., Aknin, L., Allen, J., Brosbøl, K., Colombo, F., Barron, G. C., Espinosa, M. F., Gaspar, V., Gaviria, A., et al. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01585-9 · Cited by 842
Countering Misinformation and Fake News Through Inoculation and Prebunking
Lewandowsky, S., & van der Linden, S. (2021) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2021.1876983 · Cited by 773
Rocha, Y. M., de Moura, G. A., Desidério, G. A., de Oliveira, C. H., Lourenço, F. D., & Nicolete, L. D. D. F. (2021) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1007/s10389-021-01658-z · Cited by 485
Chater, N., & Loewenstein, G. (2023) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x22002023 · Cited by 710
COVID‐19 vaccination intention in the first year of the pandemic: A systematic review
Al-Amer, R. M., Maneze, D., Everett, B., Montayre, J., Villarosa, A. R., Dwekat, E., & Salamonson, Y. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.15951 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- van der Linden, S., Roozenbeek, J., & Compton, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Dartmouth College (US)
- Corresponding author
- van der Linden, Sander
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2020-10-23
- Volume
- 11
- Pages
- 566790-566790
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7644779
- OpenAlex
- W3094229442
- Cited by
- 632
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 70 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 127 · 2023: 120 · 2022: 143 · 2021: 98 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 121.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Apollo (cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, misinformation, infodemic, fake news, psychological inoculation, prebunking, preventive health behavior, social media, behavioral interventions, SARS-CoV-2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
