Cited by 30Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesWorkaholism, burnout, and well-beingWorkplace Health and Well-being

Procrastination, Perfectionism, and Other Work-Related Mental Problems: Prevalence, Types, Assessment, and Treatment—A Scoping Review

Open access
Steinert, Christiane, Heim, Nikolas, Leichsenring, Falk·2021·Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract

Work-related mental problems can be defined as behaviors, emotions and cognitions that impede the successful completion of a task in a given time frame, i. e., the difficulty or inability to achieve important work-related goals. They are highly prevalent but have been neglected in psychology in general and as a target of psychotherapy in particular. Although work-related problems do not represent a mental disorder per se, they are associated with severe distress and high psychosocial costs. In this article, the prevalence of work-related problems, associated burden, diagnostic assessment and treatment are reviewed. So far, research has primarily focused on procrastination, i.e., the act of postponing or delaying tasks until the last minute or past the deadline. However, procrastination represents just one type of work-related problems among several others. Further forms of work-related problems are presented (e.g., perfectionism, or work-related problems in the context of specific personality types). The relation of work-related problems to specific mental disorders is discussed. Psychosocial interventions are the treatment of choice for work-related mental problems. However, response rates for the treatment of procrastination are limited, which calls for further research into which treatments work for whom. No evidence-based treatments are currently available for other types of work-related problems, with the exception of perfectionism, a personality trait that is also linked to problems in the field of work. Thus, there is a need to further improve the treatment of work-related problems including procrastination. For other types of work-related problems, effective treatments need to be developed and validated. They may be based on existing manualized treatments and extended by specific aspects or modules focusing on work-related problems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.736776

Cites

96 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Procrastination often leads to heightened psychological distress due to unmet deadlines and compromised academic performance.

    “Studies suggest that procrastination often leads to heightened psychological distress due to unmet deadlines and compromised academic performance [34].”

    From The role of academic procrastination in the occurrence of depression, anxiety, and stress among college students (2026) · cites this paper as [34]

    The review’s ‘Prevalence and Burden of Work-related Problems’ section (page not provided) associates procrastination with poor academic performance, perceived stress, depression, and anxiety. Its ‘Definition’ section says procrastination can extend past a deadline, but the review does not establish that missed deadlines or poorer academic performance cause psychological distress. The claim turns reported associations into a causal explanation. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [35]Bowlby J. Attachment. Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1. Loss. New York, NY: Basic Books (1969).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steinert, C., Heim, N., & Leichsenring, F.
Affiliations
  • Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
  • The Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Steinert, Christiane
Venue
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Published
2021-10-11
Volume
12
Pages
736776-736776
ISSN
1664-0640 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3206229802
Cited by
29
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Universitätsbibliothek Gießen (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
procrastination, perfectionism, work-related problems, psychosocial interventions, treatment response, prevalence, diagnostic assessment, personality types, work-related distress, evidence-based treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review