The DOI matches its Crossref record; 137 of the 148 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 80 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence
Open accessAbstract
Biological systems function through complex interactions between various ‘omics (biomolecules), and a more complete understanding of these systems is only possible through an integrated, multi-omic perspective. This has presented the need for the development of integration approaches that are able to capture the complex, often non-linear, interactions that define these biological systems and are adapted to the challenges of combining the heterogenous data across ‘omic views. A principal challenge to multi-omic integration is missing data because all biomolecules are not measured in all samples. Due to either cost, instrument sensitivity, or other experimental factors, data for a biological sample may be missing for one or more ‘omic techologies. Recent methodological developments in artificial intelligence and statistical learning have greatly facilitated the analyses of multi-omics data, however many of these techniques assume access to completely observed data. A subset of these methods incorporate mechanisms for handling partially observed samples, and these methods are the focus of this review. We describe recently developed approaches, noting their primary use cases and highlighting each method's approach to handling missing data. We additionally provide an overview of the more traditional missing data workflows and their limitations; and we discuss potential avenues for further developments as well as how the missing data issue and its current solutions may generalize beyond the multi-omics context.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review surveys recent AI/ML multi-omics integration methods that explicitly handle partially observed data, either by joint imputation within the model or by optimization masking of missing components. It also summarizes traditional missing-data workflows and discusses limitations, especially sample-size demands, limited coverage of mass-spectrometry omics, and interpretability.
Key findings
- Missing data are pervasive in omics: proteomics can have 20–50% of possible peptide values unquantified, and the human proteome project estimates ~20% of genes yield protein products not detected by mass spectrometry.
- The review groups missing-data-robust integration methods into joint-imputation approaches (e.g., FBM, iMODA, MOFA/MOFA+, BIDIFAC+) and optimization-masking approaches (e.g., TiMEG, COMBI, MVAE, DeepMF, MvNE, DeepIMV, JACA, SUMO, NEMO, MSNE, MONET), across early, middle, and late integration categories.
- Reported performance varies with missingness: FBM prediction RMSE increased with missing percentage, most prominently when both gene expression and methylation had 30% missingness; iMODA power decreased with 50% and 30% missingness; MOFA imputation had lower MSE than feature-wise mean, SoftImpute, and KNN across ~10–80% missingness; DeepMF identified simulated MCAR sample/feature subgroups with perfect accuracy at 10%, 50%, and 70% missingness; SUMO slightly outperformed NEMO except at extreme missingness (80% and greater).
- BIDIFAC+ enables bi-dimensional integration across omics and sample cohorts, but took nearly 24 h to converge on a combined TCGA dataset, and assumes shared structures are present across integrated matrices.
Methods
- Narrative review of AI/ML and statistical-learning approaches for multi-omics integration that accommodate missing data, plus background on traditional missing-data mechanisms (MCAR, MAR, MNAR) and imputation/complete-case workflows.
- Methods are categorized by integration strategy (early/concatenation, middle/transformation-based, late/model-based) and by missing-data handling strategy (joint-imputation vs. optimization-masking).
- Table 1 summarizes each reviewed method’s integration approach, missing-data approach, compatible omics platforms, primary use case, application dataset characteristics, and software availability.
Limitations
- The paper states that many reviewed methods implicitly require relatively large sample sizes, as their application datasets contain hundreds to thousands of observations, which may be prohibitive for rare diseases or small studies.
- The paper states that many methods were motivated by or evaluated on sequencing-based omics, with few considering metabolomics, proteomics, or lipidomics, where mass-spectrometry-specific batch effects, missingness mechanisms, and identification uncertainty may violate model assumptions.
- The paper notes that only FBM and iMODA describe how correlation structure is modeled or affects results among joint-imputation approaches, and that many middle-integration methods are black-box with limited interpretability; evident from the text, this is a review rather than an independent benchmark, so performance claims are drawn from original publications and simulations.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
54 Not checked yet · 36 Own interpretation · 14 No basis given
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While all these methods have been presented within the context of multi-omics integration, few explicitly require the use multi-omics data.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“many of the middle integration methods discussed here are black-box in nature, as the specific relationships learned by each are often incommunicable.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“However, data integration is one of the primary barriers to effective multi-omics research and reaching the desired holistic view of the biological system being studied (Misra et al., 2019).”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Misra et al., 2019 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Recent methodological developments in artificial intelligence and statistical learning have greatly facilitated the analyses of multi-omics data, however many of these techniques assume access to completely observed data.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A subset of these methods incorporate mechanisms for handling partially observed samples, and these methods are the focus of this review.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) have shown promise in overcoming some of these hindrances (e.g., Mirza et al., 2019; Zhu, 2020) and have gained popularity in recent years.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Introduction
What the sources say
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“However, the observed decreases in predictive performance were observed to be mitigated as the sample size was increased.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Integrative approaches for partially observed multi-omics > Early integration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fang et al., 2018 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The FBM model assumes gene-gene and methylation-methylation independence, and imputed values reflect this assumption.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, the human proteome project reports that an estimated ~20% of genes yield protein products that are not detected by mass spectrometry, an analytic platform for protein quantification (Paik et al., 2012; Baker et al., 2017).”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Introduction
What the sources say
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A similar trend is observed for block-level missingness, which is the type of missingness where several omics (columns) are missing across a set of samples (rows).”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Integrative approaches for partially observed multi-omics > Middle integration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lock et al., 2022 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It is not uncommon to have 20–50% of the possible peptide values that are not quantified (Webb-Robertson et al., 2015; Brenes et al., 2019).”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Background > Missing data and imputation
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 41
- Probably not a substantial claim. 30
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Identifying these groupings within latent factors is often a post-hoc process, however, and such domain-relevant groupings are not always identifiable within generated latent factors.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A principal challenge to multi-omic integration is missing data because all biomolecules are not measured in all samples.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hinderances to effective integration methods include, but are not limited to, the heterogeneous nature of data and distributional properties across multi-omics datasets, the typically large difference in the number of measured biomolecules compared to number of samples or replicates, and the complex and often noisy nature of biological data.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Due to either cost, instrument sensitivity, or other experimental factors, data for a biological sample may be missing for one or more ‘omic techologies.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Abstract
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Furthermore, additional complexities including protein isolation and solubilization, sequence ambiguity, and a lack of standards in statistical thresholds and algorithms result in inconsistent detection of large proportions of protein products that are detected, thus limiting the reproducibility of data collection and analysis (Goh and Wong, 2017).”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Goh and Wong, 2017
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In ‘omics studies, data are more commonly MNAR or MAR, considering that instruments are known to have certain detection thresholds (MNAR) and that biochemical dependencies exist between different biomolecules (MAR).”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Background > Missing data and imputation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If an entire view is missing for one or more samples and must be imputed, any level of similarity specific to that view may be lost.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Background > Multi-omics integration
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Missing data are common in ‘omics data and can arise due to a variety of reasons, such as poor tissue quality, insufficient sample volume, measurement system limitations, budget restrictions, or subject dropout.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Background > Missing data and imputation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When faced with missing data, these methods thus require a complete case analysis or the implementation of separate imputation steps beforehand.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Background > Multi-omics integration
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However the authors note that models incorporating gene-gene and methylation-methylation correlations were additionally considered, but these models were associated with a higher computational cost without indicating substantive gains in performance relative to models based on the independence assumption.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Integrative approaches for partially observed multi-omics > Early integration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fang et al., 2018 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The FBM model assumes gene-gene and methylation-methylation independence, and imputed values reflect this assumption.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Given the prevalence of missing data across different ‘omics, the approach that ML and AI models use in handling missing observations is of great importance when considering multi-omics integration methods.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“KNN imputation has been shown to work well for numerical imputation on single datasets (Jadhav et al., 2019), but the algorithm is sensitive to the choice of the number of nearest neighbors (k) and is limited in that it does not utilize the potential structure across the entire set of observations.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Background > Missing data and imputation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jadhav et al., 2019 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While more robust than a complete case analysis since less data are dropped, an available case analysis is still only valid under the MCAR assumption and generates conclusions based on different parts of the data, potentially leading to biased or conflicting inference.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Background > Missing data and imputation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, like mean imputation, imputed values from these approaches may distort feature distributions and lead to biased parameter and variability estimates (Lubin et al., 2004; Succop et al., 2004; Webb-Robertson et al., 2015; Lazar et al., 2016; Bramer et al., 2020).”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Background > Missing data and imputation
What the sources say
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Middle integration applies some transformation to represent a complex combination of the datasets before applying downstream analyses.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Background > Multi-omics integration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ritchie et al., 2015 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Missing samples in multi-omics data are rarely MCAR, and thus inference based on a complete case analysis is likely to be biased.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Background > Multi-omics integration
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Both these methods require complete input, and initial imputation is performed in both cases to accommodate.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Background > Multi-omics integration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Xie et al., 2019 source
- Not checked yetcites Xu et al., 2019
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These methods rely on an imputation pre-processing step, which could possibly negatively affect the downstream analyses, as the relationships between nodes/samples/biomarkers may be biased toward similarities in imputation.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Background > Multi-omics integration
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Integration techniques generally assume measurements from the same samples on several markers, or features, from several ‘omics-data types, which are more generally referred to as data “views”.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Background > Multi-omics integration
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“While this simple approach preserves feature means and grants access to the use of more data, it does not preserve relationships among variables and may lead to an underestimate of variability (Gelman and Hill, 2006).”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Background > Missing data and imputation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gelman and Hill, 2006 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In metabolomics, limited coverage of the known metabolome increases the risk of overlooking the metabolomic response of interest in targeted metabolomic analyses.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Early integration is primarily characterized by an initial concatenation of the features across all measured ‘omics, followed by application of methods appropriate for analyzing the resulting high-dimensional dataset.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Background > Multi-omics integration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ritchie et al., 2015 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Late integration analyzes each dataset separately and introduces a model or algorithm that combines the outputs of each individual analysis.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Background > Multi-omics integration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ritchie et al., 2015 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Peptides may be missing from one or more samples due to a variety of underlying mechanisms (Daly et al., 2008; Karpievitch et al., 2009), which can result in non-trivial amounts of potential observations being missing.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Background > Missing data and imputation
What the sources say
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Given the ubiquity of partially observed cases in multi-omics datasets—and that most integrative multi-omics methods are not inherently compatible with partially observed data—imputation methods are often incorporated as a data pre-processing step within the multi-omics analytic pipeline, or alternatively, partially observed samples are dropped and a complete case analysis is performed.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Background > Missing data and imputation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Given the tendency of neural networks to overfit to the training data, it is possible that any bias in the imputation of the training data—which is likely due to the common violation of MAR in ‘omics data—will be erroneously exploited by the network.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Background > Multi-omics integration
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The missing percentages considered ranged between ~10–~80%, and all methods demonstrated increases to mean squared error of prediction with increased missing percentage.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Integrative approaches for partially observed multi-omics > Middle integration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Argelaguet et al., 2018 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This approach, while convenient, results in a decrease in sample size, throws away useful data, is only valid under the MCAR assumption and can otherwise lead to biased estimates (Fang et al., 2018; Hawinkel et al., 2020).”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Background > Missing data and imputation
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Each of the previously described imputation methods have generally been developed within the context of a single dataset, however multi-omics data are uniquely characterized by several separate, yet related, datasets. This aspect of multi-omics has therefore motivated the development of several newer approaches that leverage information across different ‘omics datasets to inform imputations.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Background > Missing data and imputation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The power of the iMODA framework to detect the effects of interest has been reported to vary according to the proportion of data that are missing. The authors considered cases where 50% and 30% of data were missing, finding that power decreases with increased missingness.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Integrative approaches for partially observed multi-omics > Early integration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lin et al., 2020 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The known causal hierarchy across biomolecules is that genotype affects omic expression, which influences phenotype.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Related to this point, many of the methods described here were motivated by or evaluated exclusively on sequencing-based omics platforms (e.g., transcriptomics, genomics, and epigenomics) and few considered the fuller breadth of omics platforms that includes metabolomics, proteomics, lipidomics, etc.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Contrasting with the sequencing-based ‘omics used by many of the methods reviewed in this work, data of other ‘omics are typically generated by a mass spectrometer, an instrument whose use introduces several nuances to the data which may mean integration model assumptions reasonably made for sequencing-based data may not hold for mass spectrometry-based data.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The datasets considered by these approaches contain hundreds, if not thousands, of observations, sample sizes that may be practically prohibitive due to cost, biospecimen availability, or both.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Discussion
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Notably, there is no constraint on the number of detected modules, nor is there an upper bound on module size.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Integrative approaches for partially observed multi-omics > Late integration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rappoport et al., 2020 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, Lock et al. (2022) note that BIDIFAC+ assumes that shared structures are present across the integrated matrices, an assumption that may be violated in practice.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lock et al., 2022 source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: BIDIFAC+ assumes that shared structures are present across the integrated matrices.
In the paper
“This PoE model architecture is robust to partially observed samples, combining only the ‘omic-specific encodings of each partial sample's observed ‘omics during model training.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Integrative approaches for partially observed multi-omics > Middle integration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wu and Goodman (2018)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: MVAE assumes that data views are independent from one another, given a shared latent representation.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“As well, the range of adjusted rand index values (the performance metric used) was typically observed to be narrower for SUMO, suggesting less variability in expected performance.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Integrative approaches for partially observed multi-omics > Middle integration
What the sources say
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The authors circumvent this issue by proposing a heuristic algorithm that identifies a local maximum and recommend using the best solution from repeated runs of the algorithm to better approximate the globally maximal solution.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Integrative approaches for partially observed multi-omics > Late integration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rappoport et al., 2020 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, it should be noted that these evaluations were completed in a simulated data setting in which data were simulated as missing completely at random (MCAR) and ground truth feature subgroups were generated with simple discrimination boundaries.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Integrative approaches for partially observed multi-omics > Middle integration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chen et al., 2019 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These methods also commonly investigate differences in “early”, “middle”, and “late” fusion and work has even been done to address the view-missing and view-heterogeneity problems (Nagrani et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2020).”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Discussion
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The criteria of sets of features from distinct views across a shared set of samples is applicable to any domain where the combination of different data sources provides a more complete representation of the system under investigation.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On the other hand, though dependencies exist between different ‘omics data, important differences between ‘omics must also be accounted for in developed integrative approaches.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Discussion
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In untargeted metabolomics and lipidomics false discovery rates are difficult to compute and largely not accurate (Stein, 1994; Jeong et al., 2011; Matsuda et al., 2013; Kim and Zhang, 2014).”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Discussion
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This algorithm incorporates partially observed samples by representing their missing components as edgeless nodes within their corresponding edge-weighted graphs.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Integrative approaches for partially observed multi-omics > Late integration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rappoport et al., 2020 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These cases present the need for methods that generate reliable inference despite smaller sample sizes and avoid overfitting to the data.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Discussion
plaindirectn = 16- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“many of the deep-learning architectures mentioned in this review have similarities to ones used in analysis of digital media that try to combine multiple modalities to improve predictive performance of video content (Carreira and Zisserman, 2017; Afouras et al., 2019).”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Discussion
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“For example, a study to identify biomarkers for Snyder Robinson syndrome, a rare neurological disorder, obtained data on 16 patients, only three of which presented with the disorder of interest (Abela et al., 2015).”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Abela et al., 2015 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“manual verification of metabolites following identification scoring is required for shotgun metabolomics, as scoring methods are much less mature than for other ‘omics data types (Stein and Scott, 1994; Samaraweera et al., 2018).”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Stein and Scott, 1994
- Not checked yetcites Samaraweera et al., 2018 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We describe this requirement as “implicit” given that it is rarely, if ever, stated as a limitation, but instead implied based on the sample sizes of the datasets that these methods were successfully applied to.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Using the area under the receiver-operator curve (AUROC) as a performance metric, the authors found that the performance of DeepIMV diminished with increased missingness but performed as well as or better than the compared approaches.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Integrative approaches for partially observed multi-omics > Middle integration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lee and van der Schaar, 2021
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As well, they noted that BIDIFAC+ took nearly 24 h to reach convergence when fitted to a combined TCGA dataset, and thus the method may not scale well with larger aggregations of datasets.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lock et al., 2022 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Kok et al. (2018) notes, for example, that one may need around 19 samples per group to detect a fold change of 1.5 in microRNA data at 80% power and false discovery rate <10%.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kok et al., 2018 source
hedgedn = 19- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Insights from the ‘omics domain, where some of these issues are most salient, could transfer to other domains.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The methodological choices inherent to the ‘omics domain are usually the ones that offer the ability to constrain or elucidate relationships between biomarkers.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Discussion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the groupings implicit within the latent factors generated by these models may be contextualized according to domain-specific knowledge (e.g., shared molecular pathways), thus increasing their interpretability and allowing one to infer underlying relationships.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some common choices are the use of principal-component-like representations that might identify important groups of biomarkers, and the injection of prior knowledge through techniques that constrain the relationships between features such as directed edges in graph representations, hard parameter constraints, or carefully chosen priors in”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“the relationships between features such as directed edges in graph representations, hard parameter constraints, or carefully chosen priors in Bayesian frameworks.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“incorporating domain knowledge may be key toward bridging the interpretability gap apparent across these methods.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If the generation of these latent factors were instead guided by domain knowledge, resulting groupings may be more likely to hold relevance and rely less on post-hoc analyses for contextualization”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
“instead guided by domain knowledge, resulting groupings may be more likely to hold relevance and rely less on post-hoc analyses for contextualization within the scientific domain.”
§ Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
The paper relies on this without support.
Existing multi-omics data integration review articles either do not address or only briefly mention methods for handling missing observations.
“Despite the importance of considering methods for handling missing observations, this topic is either not addressed or is only briefly mentioned in existing multi-omics data integration review articles.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The iBAG approach assumes completely observed data.
“The iBAG approach assumes completely observed data, and to remedy this, the FBM approach introduces a third, imputation layer that models missing gene expression and methylation data through multivariate normal distributions.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The FBM model assumes gene-gene and methylation-methylation independence, and imputed values reflect this assumption.
“Also worth noting is that the FBM model assumes gene-gene and methylation-methylation independence and imputed values reflect this assumption accordingly.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
MVAE assumes that data views are independent from one another, given a shared latent representation.
“One key assumption made by this approach is that data views are independent from one another, given a shared latent representation.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
BIDIFAC+ assumes that shared structures are present across the integrated matrices.
“Lock et al. (2022) note that BIDIFAC+ assumes that shared structures are present across the integrated matrices, an assumption that may be violated in practice.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The known causal hierarchy across biomolecules is that genotype affects omic expression, which influences phenotype.
“The proposed framework is aligned with the known causal hierarchy across these biomolecules, i.e., genotype affects ‘omic expression which influences phenotype.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Gene expression is known to be affected by changes to the DNA sequence.
“For example, gene expression is known to be affected by changes to the DNA sequence.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Although these methods are simple and easy to implement, they can introduce bias and reduce data variability (Flores et al., 2023).”
From Navigating the landscape of multimodal AI in medicine: A scoping review on technical challenges and clinical applications (2025) · cites this paper as Flores et al., 2023
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444 · cited 2×
“Missing ‘omics data are accommodated through an expectation-maximization (EM) approach (Dempster et al., 1977) for parameter estimation.”
MethodOn Information and Sufficiency
Kullback, S., & Leibler, R. A. (1951) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729694 · Cited by 20,193
Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes
Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6114 · Cited by 20,067
mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R
Buuren, S. V., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v045.i03 · Cited by 13,870
Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models
Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790942 · Cited by 13,597
RUBIN, D. B. (1976) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/63.3.581 · Cited by 9,925
Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Dataset
Carreira, J., & Zisserman, A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.502 · Cited by 9,570 · cited 1×
“For example, many of the deep-learning architectures mentioned in this review have similarities to ones used in analysis of digital media that try to combine multiple modalities to improve predictive performance of video content (Carreira and Zisserman, 2017; Afouras et al., 2019).”
Hanrahan, G. (2008) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420067972-10 · Cited by 8,196
(2010) · Cited by 7,034
Missing Value Estimation Methods for DNA Microarrays
Troyanskaya, O., Cantor, M., Sherlock, G., Brown, P., Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Botstein, D., & Altman, R. B. (2001) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.6.520 · Cited by 4,230
The information bottleneck method
Tishby, N., Pereira, F. C., & Bialek, W. (2000) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.physics/0004057 · Cited by 2,626 · cited 1×
“DeepIMV’s latent mappings are trained according to the informational bottleneck principle (Tishby et al., 2000; Alemi et al., 2016; Achille and Soatto, 2017), which seeks to define task-relevant data representations that respect the balance between parsimony and predictive power.”
BackgroundFast Kd-Trees for the Kullback-Leibler Divergence and Other Decomposable Bregman Divergences
Pham, T., & Wagner, H. (2025) · Leibniz international proceedings in informatics · doi:10.4230/lipics.wads.2025.45 · Cited by 2,353
Quasi-likelihood functions, generalized linear models, and the gauss-newton method
Wedderburn, R. W. M. (1974) · Biometrika · doi:10.2307/2334725 · Cited by 2,122
Protein biomarker discovery and validation: the long and uncertain path to clinical utility
Rifai, N., Gillette, M. A., & Carr, S. A. (2006) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1235 · Cited by 1,867 · cited 1×
“Finally, additional sources of uncertainty may arise from processes such as protein quantification in bottom-up proteomics (Rifai et al., 2006; Plubell et al., 2022) as measurements are made at the peptide level and isoforms can be difficult to identify (Forshed et al.”
BackgroundDeep Variational Information BottleneckPreprint
Alemi, A. A., Fischer, I., Dillon, J. V., & Murphy, K. P. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1612.00410 · Cited by 1,684 · cited 1×
“DeepIMV’s latent mappings are trained according to the informational bottleneck principle (Tishby et al., 2000; Alemi et al., 2016; Achille and Soatto, 2017), which seeks to define task-relevant data representations that respect the balance between parsimony and predictive power.”
BackgroundMultiple Kernel Learning Algorithms
Gönen, M., & Alpaydın, E. (2011) · Cited by 1,651
Multi-omics Data Integration, Interpretation, and Its Application
Subramanian, I., Verma, S., Kumar, S., Jere, A., & Anamika, K. (2020) · Bioinformatics and Biology Insights · doi:10.1177/1177932219899051 · Cited by 1,609 · cited 1×
“…‘omics data types, such as single cell ‘omics (Ma et al., 2020) or specific application areas, such as plant biology (Rajasundaram and Selbig, 2016), microbial communities (Fondi and Liò, 2015; Franzosa et al., 2015), cancer (Buescher and Driggers, 2016), and others (e.g., Subramanian et al., 2020).”
BackgroundMulti-Omics Factor Analysis—a framework for unsupervised integration of multi-omics data sets
Argelaguet, R., Velten, B., Arnol, D., Dietrich, S., Zenz, T., Marioni, J. C., Buettner, F., Huber, W., & Stegle, O. (2018) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20178124 · Cited by 1,510
Regularization methods for learning incomplete matrices
Mazumder, R., Hastie, T. J., & Tibshirani, R. J. (2009) · PubMed · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0906.2034 · Cited by 1,175
DIABLO: an integrative approach for identifying key molecular drivers from multi-omics assays
Singh, A., Shannon, C. P., Gautier, B., Rohart, F., Vacher, M. A., Tebbutt, S. J., & Cao, K. L. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty1054 · Cited by 1,124
MOFA+: a statistical framework for comprehensive integration of multi-modal single-cell data
Argelaguet, R., Arnol, D., Bredikhin, D., Deloro, Y., Velten, B., Marioni, J. C., & Stegle, O. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02015-1 · Cited by 1,091 · cited 1×
“, 2018) and its more recent improvement, MOFA+ (Argelaguet et al., 2020) are unsupervised integrative approaches that may be understood as generalizations of principal components analysis (PCA) to multi-omics data.”
BackgroundMethods of integrating data to uncover genotype-phenotype interactions
Ritchie, M. D., Holzinger, E. R., Li, R., Pendergrass, S. A., & Kim, D. (2015) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3868 · Cited by 1,085 · cited 1×
“A sensible partition is of early, middle, and late integrative methods, alternatively denoted as concatenation, transformation-based, or model-based integration, respectively (Ritchie et al., 2015).”
BackgroundEpidemiologic evaluation of measurement data in the presence of detection limits
Lubin, J. H., Colt, J. S., Camann, D., Davis, S., Cerhan, J. R., Severson, R. K., Bernstein, L., & Hartge, P. (2004) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.7199 · Cited by 1,021
Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis: A review
Reel, P. S., Reel, S., Pearson, E., Trucco, E., & Jefferson, E. (2021) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107739 · Cited by 903 · cited 1×
“…of subsets of general AI and ML approaches to multi-omics data integration (e.g., Li et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2017; Kim and Tagkopoulos, 2018; Picard et al., 2021; Reel et al., 2021; Lee and Kim, 2022) with some attention given to limitations of methods, such as interpretability of models.”
MethodOptimization and testing of mass spectral library search algorithms for compound identification
Stein, S. E., & Scott, D. R. (1994) · Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1016/1044-0305(94)87009-8 · Cited by 882 · cited 2×
“In untargeted metabolomics and lipidomics false discovery rates are difficult to compute and largely not accurate (Stein, 1994; Jeong et al., 2011; Matsuda et al., 2013; Kim and Zhang, 2014).”
MethodDeep Audio-Visual Speech Recognition
Afouras, T., Chung, J. S., Senior, A., Vinyals, O., & Zisserman, A. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2018.2889052 · Cited by 801 · cited 1×
“For example, many of the deep-learning architectures mentioned in this review have similarities to ones used in analysis of digital media that try to combine multiple modalities to improve predictive performance of video content (Carreira and Zisserman, 2017; Afouras et al., 2019).”
Canonical analysis of several sets of variables
Kettenring, J. R. (1971) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/58.3.433 · Cited by 798 · cited 3×
“When α = 0 the JACA loss reduces to that of CCA or SUMCOR multiset CCA (Kettenring, 1971) with sparsity regularization, depending on whether three or more ‘omics are under consideration.”
BackgroundSequencing and beyond: integrating molecular 'omics' for microbial community profiling
Franzosa, E. A., Hsu, T. Y., Sirota‐Madi, A., Shafquat, A., Abu-Ali, G., Morgan, X. C., & Huttenhower, C. (2015) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3451 · Cited by 761 · cited 1×
“, 2020) or specific application areas, such as plant biology (Rajasundaram and Selbig, 2016), microbial communities (Fondi and Liò, 2015; Franzosa et al., 2015), cancer (Buescher and Driggers, 2016), and others (e.”
BackgroundMore Is Better: Recent Progress in Multi-Omics Data Integration Methods
Huang, S., Chaudhary, K., & Garmire, L. X. (2017) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2017.00084 · Cited by 739 · cited 1×
“…a handful of reviews are dedicated to discussion of subsets of general AI and ML approaches to multi-omics data integration (e.g., Li et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2017; Kim and Tagkopoulos, 2018; Picard et al., 2021; Reel et al., 2021; Lee and Kim, 2022) with some attention given to limitations of…”
BackgroundMolecular Biologist's Guide to Proteomics
Graves, P. R., & Haystead, T. (2002) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.66.1.39-63.2002 · Cited by 722 · cited 1×
“Proteomics instrumentation can measure the relative abundance of proteins that are produced from gene expression and transcript translation (Graves and Haystead, 2002).”
BackgroundMissing Value Imputation Approach for Mass Spectrometry-based Metabolomics Data
Wei, R., Wang, J., Su, M., Jia, E., Chen, S., Chen, T., & Ni, Y. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-19120-0 · Cited by 720 · cited 2×
“When an assumption of MCAR or MAR is used, the missingness is said to be ignorable and methods designed to handle missing values are applied to both cases (Gelman and Hill, 2006; Fang et al., 2018; Wei et al., 2018).”
BackgroundMethodIntegration strategies of multi-omics data for machine learning analysis
Picard, M., Scott-Boyer, M.-P., Bodein, A., Périn, O., & Droit, A. (2021) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2021.06.030 · Cited by 696 · cited 5×
“Picard et al. (2021) further separate the early-middle-late categorization into early, mixed, late, intermediate, and hierarchical.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialIntegrated omics: tools, advances and future approaches
Misra, B. B., Langefeld, C., Olivier, M., & Cox, L. A. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/jme-18-0055 · Cited by 686 · cited 2×
“However, data integration is one of the primary barriers to effective multi-omics research and reaching the desired holistic view of the biological system being studied (Misra et al., 2019).”
BackgroundSpectral Regularization Algorithms for Learning Large Incomplete Matrices
MazumderRahul, HastieTrevor, & TibshiraniRobert (2010) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/1756006.1859931 · Cited by 671 · cited 1×
“As a joint-imputation approach, MOFA/MOFA + was compared to other imputation strategies including imputation by feature-wise mean, SoftImpute (Mazumder et al., 2010) and a k-nearest neighbor approach (Troyanskaya et al., 2001).”
MethodAnalyzing Compositional Data with R
van den Boogaart, K. G., & Tolosana‐Delgado, R. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36809-7 · Cited by 661
What Makes Training Multi-modal Classification Networks Hard?
Wang, W., Tran, D., & Feiszli, M. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01271 · Cited by 588
Joint and individual variation explained (JIVE) for integrated analysis of multiple data types
Lock, E. F., Hoadley, K. A., Marron, J. S., & Nobel, A. B. (2013) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/12-aoas597 · Cited by 572 · cited 1×
“BIDIFAC+ builds upon BIDIFAC (Park and Lock, 2019) and SLIDE (Gaynanova and Li, 2019), two extensions of the JIVE method (Lock et al., 2013) that yields matrix factorizations that convey a decomposition of data variability into variability shared across multiple ‘omics and variability primarily attributable to single…”
MethodLazar, C., Gatto, L., Ferro, M., Bruley, C., & Bürger, T. (2016) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00981 · Cited by 549
Comparison of performance of data imputation methods for numeric dataset
Jadhav, A., Pramod, D., & Ramanathan, K. (2019) · Applied Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1080/08839514.2019.1637138 · Cited by 471
Big data and artificial intelligence modeling for drug discovery
Zhu, H. (2020) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010919-023324 · Cited by 455 · cited 2×
“Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) have shown promise in overcoming some of these hindrances (e.g., Mirza et al., 2019; Zhu, 2020) and have gained popularity in recent years.”
BackgroundMethods for the integration of multi-omics data: mathematical aspects
Bersanelli, M., Mosca, E., Remondini, D., Giampieri, E., Sala, C., Castellani, G., & Milanesi, L. (2016) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-015-0857-9 · Cited by 449 · cited 1×
“Some reviews focus on differentiating general data-driven integration approaches from a mathematical perspective (e.g., Ritchie et al., 2015; Bersanelli et al., 2016; Noor et al., 2019), focus on a particular type of method, such as dimension reduction (Meng et al.”
BackgroundA review on machine learning principles for multi-view biological data integration
Li, Y., Wu, F., & Ngom, A. (2016) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbw113 · Cited by 432
Data integration in the era of omics: current and future challenges
Gómez-Cabrero, D., Abugessaisa, I., Maier, D., Teschendorff, A. E., Merkenschlager, M., Gisel, A., Ballestar, E., Bongcam‐Rudloff, E., Conesa, A., & Tegner, J. N. (2014) · BMC Systems Biology · doi:10.1186/1752-0509-8-s2-i1 · Cited by 426
MOLI: multi-omics late integration with deep neural networks for drug response prediction
Sharifi-Noghabi, H., Zolotareva, O., Collins, C. C., & Ester, M. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz318 · Cited by 421 · cited 1×
“Another example, MOLI (Sharifi-Noghabi et al., 2019), similarly processes each view separately through a DNN and concatenates The vast majority of these integration approaches require completely observed data for their implementation.”
BackgroundArtificial intelligence for proteomics and biomarker discovery
Mann, M., Kumar, C., Zeng, W., & Strauss, M. T. (2021) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2021.06.006 · Cited by 406
A roadmap for multi-omics data integration using deep learning
Kang, M., Ko, E., & Mersha, T. B. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbab454 · Cited by 389
Dimension reduction techniques for the integrative analysis of multi-omics data
Meng, C., Zeleznik, O. A., Thallinger, G., Küster, B., Gholami, A. M., & Culhane, A. C. (2016) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbv108 · Cited by 384 · cited 1×
“, 2019), focus on a particular type of method, such as dimension reduction (Meng et al., 2016), or compare data-driven models against biologically-informed models for a particular model type, such as networkmodels (Wanichthanarak et al.”
MethodMachine learning and integrative analysis of biomedical big data
Mirza, B., Wang, W., Wang, J., Choi, H., Chung, N. C., & Ping, P. (2019) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes10020087 · Cited by 380 · cited 1×
“Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) have shown promise in overcoming some of these hindrances (e.g., Mirza et al., 2019; Zhu, 2020) and have gained popularity in recent years.”
BackgroundMachine learning for multi-omics data integration in cancer
Cai, Z., Poulos, R. C., Liu, J., & Zhong, Q. (2022) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.103798 · Cited by 366 · cited 1×
“, 2022) and a majority focused on cancer research (e.g., Wang and Gu, 2016; Biswas and Chakrabarti, 2020; Nicora et al., 2020; Cai et al., 2022).”
BackgroundRegularized Generalized Canonical Correlation Analysis
Tenenhaus, A., & Tenenhaus, M. (2011) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-011-9206-8 · Cited by 361
State of the field in multi-omics research: from computational needs to data mining and sharing
Krassowski, M., Das, V., Sahu, S. K., & Misra, B. B. (2020) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2020.610798 · Cited by 351 · cited 1×
“This is as opposed to other (larger) transcriptomics platforms that would require at least 35 samples per group to detect the same magnitude fold change at the same power and false discovery rate levels (Krassowski et al., 2020).”
BackgroundSun, D., Wang, M., & Li, A. (2019) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2018.2806438 · Cited by 338 · cited 1×
“Late integration examples include the method introduced by Sun et al. (2019) that processes each ‘omic type separately through a deep neural network (DNN) and then performs score fusion on the predictions.”
MethodA multivariate approach to the integration of multi-omics datasets
Meng, C., Küster, B., Culhane, A. C., & Gholami, A. M. (2014) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-15-162 · Cited by 336 · cited 1×
“These generally form viewspecific representations and assume a common latent space among views (Yang and Michailidis, 2015; Chalise and Fridley, 2017) or maximize some measure among the view-specific representations (Tenenhaus and Tenenhaus, 2011;Meng et al., 2014; Tenenhaus et al., 2017; Singh et al., 2019).”
BackgroundDevelopment, characterization and comparisons of targeted and non-targeted metabolomics methods
Ribbenstedt, A., Ziarrusta, H., & Benskin, J. P. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0207082 · Cited by 311 · cited 1×
“, stationary phase and ionization mode) induces increased instrumental sensitivity toward some substances and reductions toward others (Ribbenstedt et al., 2018).”
BackgroundYang, Z., & Michailidis, G. (2016) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv544 · Cited by 295 · cited 1×
“These generally form view-specific representations and assume a common latent space among views (Yang and Michailidis, 2015; Chalise and Fridley, 2017) or maximize some measure among the view-specific representations (Tenenhaus and Tenenhaus, 2011; Meng et al., 2014; Tenenhaus et al., 2017; Singh et…”
BackgroundWebb-Robertson, B.-J. M., Wiberg, H. K., Matzke, M. M., Brown, J. N., Wang, J., McDermott, J. E., Smith, R. D., Rodland, K. D., Metz, T. O., Pounds, J. G., et al. (2015) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr501138h · Cited by 294
Self-citationThe chromosome-centric human proteome project for cataloging proteins encoded in the genome
Paik, Y.-K., Jeong, S.-K., Omenn, G. S., Uhlen, M., Hanash, S., Cho, S. Y., Lee, H.-J., Na, K., Choi, E.-Y., Yan, F., et al. (2012) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2152 · Cited by 288 · cited 1×
“For example, the human proteome project reports that an estimated ∼20% of genes yield protein products that are not detected by mass spectrometry, an analytic platform for protein quantification (Paik et al., 2012; Baker et al., 2017).”
BackgroundNEMO: cancer subtyping by integration of partial multi-omic data
Rappoport, N., & Shamir, R. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz058 · Cited by 286 · cited 1×
“Neighborhood based Multi-Omics clustering (NEMO; Rappoport and Shamir, 2019) is an algorithm that generates clusters based on individual data view similarity matrices.”
Integrated Multi-Omics Analyses in Oncology: A Review of Machine Learning Methods and Tools
Nicora, G., Vitali, F., Dagliati, A., Geifman, N., & Bellazzi, R. (2020) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.01030 · Cited by 284
Integrative Methods and Practical Challenges for Single-Cell Multi-omics
Ma, A., McDermaid, A., Xu, J., Chang, Y., & Ma, Q. (2020) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.02.013 · Cited by 280 · cited 1×
“On the other hand, many of these articles focus on integration for specific ‘omics data types, such as single cell ‘omics (Ma et al., 2020) or specific application areas, such as plant biology (Rajasundaram and Selbig, 2016), microbial communities (Fondi and Liò, 2015; Franzosa et al.”
BackgroundChalise, P., & Fridley, B. L. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176278 · Cited by 239 · cited 1×
“These generally form view-specific representations and assume a common latent space among views (Yang and Michailidis, 2015; Chalise and Fridley, 2017) or maximize some measure among the view-specific representations (Tenenhaus and Tenenhaus, 2011; Meng et al., 2014; Tenenhaus et al., 2017; Singh et…”
BackgroundEstimating probabilities of correct identification from results of mass spectral library searches
Stein, S. E. (1994) · Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1016/1044-0305(94)85022-4 · Cited by 231
Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Based Systems Biology Approaches in Multi-Omics Data Analysis of Cancer
Biswas, N., & Chakrabarti, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.588221 · Cited by 226 · cited 1×
“…engineering ( Helmy et al., 2020), precision medicine (Hamamoto et al., 2019), amongst others (e.g., Mann et al., 2021; Lin et al., 2022; Zhou et al., 2022) and a majority focused on cancer research (e.g., Wang and Gu, 2016; Biswas and Chakrabarti, 2020; Nicora et al., 2020; Cai et al., 2022).”
BackgroundGaussian mixture clustering and imputation of microarray data
Ouyang, M., Welsh, W. J., & Georgopoulos, P. (2004) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth007 · Cited by 202 · cited 1×
“It has been shown that missing values in large-scale ‘omics data can hinder downstream analyses (Ouyang et al., 2004; Jörnsten et al., 2005).”
BackgroundMultimodal Generative Models for Scalable Weakly-Supervised Learning
Wu, M., & Goodman, N. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.05335 · Cited by 200 · cited 2×
“DeepIMV (Lee and van der Schaar, 2021) incorporates some of the principles utilized by Wu and Goodman (2018) to develop a deep variational information bottleneck approach that maps integrated, multi-omics data into a lower-dimensional subspace of task-relevant embeddings.”
BackgroundMethodMultibatch TMT reveals false positives, batch effects and missing values
Brenes, A., Hukelmann, J., Bensaddek, D., & Lamond, A. I. (2019) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.ra119.001472 · Cited by 196 · cited 1×
“It is not uncommon to have 20–50% of the possible peptide values that are not quantified (WebbRobertson et al., 2015; Brenes et al., 2019).”
BackgroundMachine learning meets omics: applications and perspectives
Li, R., Li, L., Xu, Y., & Yang, J. (2021) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbab460 · Cited by 186 · cited 1×
“Included in these are articles discussing examples of method application (e.g., Holzinger et al., 2019; Li et al., 2021) and challenges in applying AI and ML techniques to multi-omics data (e.g., Kang et al., 2021; Termine et al., 2021).”
MethodImputation of data values that are less than a detection limit
Succop, P. A., Clark, S., Chen, M., & Galke, W. (2004) · Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene · doi:10.1080/15459620490462797 · Cited by 185 · cited 1×
“However, like mean imputation, imputed values from these approaches may distort feature distributions and lead to biased parameter and variability estimates (Lubin et al., 2004; Succop et al., 2004; Webb-Robertson et al., 2015; Lazar et al., 2016; Bramer et al., 2020).”
BackgroundGenomic, Proteomic, and Metabolomic Data Integration Strategies
Wanichthanarak, K., Fahrmann, J. F., & Grapov, D. (2015) · Biomarker Insights · doi:10.4137/bmi.s29511 · Cited by 181 · cited 1×
“…2019), focus on a particular type of method, such as dimension reduction (Meng et al., 2016), or compare data-driven models against biologically-informed models for a particular model type, such as network models (Wanichthanarak et al., 2015) with little attention on particular ‘omics data types.”
BackgroundTenenhaus, M., Tenenhaus, A., & Groenen, P. J. F. (2017) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-017-9573-x · Cited by 177 · cited 1×
“…form view-specific representations and assume a common latent space among views (Yang and Michailidis, 2015; Chalise and Fridley, 2017) or maximize some measure among the view-specific representations (Tenenhaus and Tenenhaus, 2011; Meng et al., 2014; Tenenhaus et al., 2017; Singh et al., 2019).”
BackgroundA statistical framework for protein quantitation in bottom-up MS-based proteomics
Karpievitch, Y., Stanley, J., Taverner, T., Huang, J., Adkins, J. N., Ansong, C., Heffron, F., Metz, T. O., Qian, W.-J., Yoon, H., et al. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp362 · Cited by 176
Multi -omics and metabolic modelling pipelines: Challenges and tools for systems microbiology
Fondi, M., & Lió, P. (2015) · Microbiological Research · doi:10.1016/j.micres.2015.01.003 · Cited by 173
Efficient co-regularised least squares regression
Brefeld, U., Gärtner, T., Scheffer, T., et al. (2006) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1143844.1143862 · Cited by 154 · cited 1×
“Similar co-regularization approaches for semisupervised multi-omic or (more generally) multi-view learning have been previously introduced (Sindhwani et al., 2005; Brefeld et al., 2006; Sun and Shawe-Taylor, 2010).”
BackgroundiBAG: integrative Bayesian analysis of high-dimensional multiplatform genomics data
Wang, W., Baladandayuthapani, V., Morris, J. S., Broom, B. M., Manyam, G. C., & Do, K.-A. (2012) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts655 · Cited by 154
Learnable PINs: cross-modal embeddings for person identity
Nagrani, A., Albanie, S., & Zisserman, A. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01261-8_5 · Cited by 151 · cited 1×
“These methods also commonly investigate differences in “early”, “middle”, and “late” fusion and work has even been done to address the view-missing and view-heterogeneity problems (Nagrani et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2020).”
MethodWhy imaging data alone is not enough: AI-based integration of imaging, omics, and clinical data
Holzinger, A., Haibe‐Kains, B., & Jurišica, I. (2019) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-019-04382-9 · Cited by 143 · cited 1×
“Included in these are articles discussing examples of method application (e.g., Holzinger et al., 2019; Li et al., 2021) and challenges in applying AI and ML techniques to multi-omics data (e.g., Kang et al., 2021; Termine et al., 2021).”
MethodHelmy, M., Smith, D. J., & Selvarajoo, K. (2020) · Metabolic Engineering Communications · doi:10.1016/j.mec.2020.e00149 · Cited by 140
iOmicsPASS: network-based integration of multiomics data for predictive subnetwork discovery
Koh, H. W. L., Fermin, D., Vogel, C., Choi, K. P., Ewing, R. M., & Choi, H. (2019) · npj Systems Biology and Applications · doi:10.1038/s41540-019-0099-y · Cited by 131
Hamamoto, R., Komatsu, M., Takasawa, K., Asada, K., & Kaneko, S. (2019) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom10010062 · Cited by 128
A Review of Integrative Imputation for Multi-Omics Datasets
Song, M., Greenbaum, J., Luttrell, J., Zhou, W., Wu, C., Shen, H., Gong, P., Zhang, C., & Deng, H.-W. (2020) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2020.570255 · Cited by 127
Xu, J., Wu, P., Chen, Y., Meng, Q., Dawood, H., & Dawood, H. (2019) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-019-3116-7 · Cited by 123 · cited 1×
“For contrast, another deep learning-based method (Xu et al., 2019) trains separate networks that see only the data from a particular view and then fuses the hidden representations at some intermediate layer.”
BackgroundDNA microarray data imputation and significance analysis of differential expression
Jörnsten, R., Wang, H.-Y., Welsh, W. J., & Ouyang, M. (2005) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti638 · Cited by 121 · cited 1×
“It has been shown that missing values in large-scale ‘omics data can hinder downstream analyses (Ouyang et al., 2004; Jörnsten et al., 2005).”
BackgroundUnsupervised multiple kernel learning for heterogeneous data integration
Mariette, J., & Vialaneix, N. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx682 · Cited by 120
Integration of omics: more than the sum of its parts
Buescher, J. M., & Driggers, E. M. (2016) · Cancer & Metabolism · doi:10.1186/s40170-016-0143-y · Cited by 119 · cited 1×
“…‘omics data types, such as single cell ‘omics (Ma et al., 2020) or specific application areas, such as plant biology (Rajasundaram and Selbig, 2016), microbial communities (Fondi and Liò, 2015; Franzosa et al., 2015), cancer (Buescher and Driggers, 2016), and others (e.g., Subramanian et al., 2020).”
BackgroundCPM-Nets: Cross Partial Multi-View Networks
Zhang, C., Han, Z., Cui, Y., Fu, H., Zhou, J. T., & Hu, Q. (2019) · neural information processing systems · Cited by 114
netDx: interpretable patient classification using integrated patient similarity networks
Pai, S., Hui, S., Isserlin, R., Shah, M. A., Kaka, H., & Bader, G. D. (2019) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20188497 · Cited by 107
Missing data imputation through the use of the random forest algorithm
Pantanowitz, A., & Marwala, T. (2009) · Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03156-4_6 · Cited by 106 · cited 1×
“Other common imputation approaches include random forest imputation (Pantanowitz and Marwala, 2009) and expectation maximization (Dempster et al.”
Data integration and predictive modeling methods for multi-omics datasets
Kim, M., & Tagkopoulos, I. (2017) · Molecular Omics · doi:10.1039/c7mo00051k · Cited by 106
Kok, M. G. M., de Ronde, M. W. J., Moerland, P. D., Ruijter, J. M., Creemers, E. E., & Pinto-Sietsma, S. J. (2018) · Biomolecular Detection and Quantification · doi:10.1016/j.bdq.2017.11.002 · Cited by 105
Evaluating and minimizing batch effects in metabolomics
Han, W., & Li, L. (2022) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.21672 · Cited by 105 · cited 1×
“For example, batch effects are common and often much more pronounced in mass spectrometry-based data (Mertens, 2016; Phua et al., 2022; e.g., Han and Li, 2020), even when the same physical instrument is used and the same data type is being generated.”
BackgroundGroup lasso regularized deep learning for cancer prognosis from multi-omics and clinical features
Xie, G., Dong, C., Kong, Y., Zhong, J. F., Li, M., & Wang, K. (2019) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes10030240 · Cited by 102 · cited 1×
“Xie et al. (2019) use deep learning to perform survival analysis, which involves feature selection by removing observations with high missingness, early concatenation of raw features to form the input to their model, and implicit feature extraction using deep neural networks, as the value at each…”
MethodAccelerating the search for the missing proteins in the human proteome
Baker, M. S., Ahn, S. B., Mohamedali, A., Islam, M. T., Cantor, D., Verhaert, P. D., Fanayan, S., Sharma, S., Nice, E. C., Connor, M., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14271 · Cited by 100 · cited 1×
“For example, the human proteome project reports that an estimated ∼ 20% of genes yield protein products that are not detected by mass spectrometry, an analytic platform for protein quantification (Paik et al., 2012; Baker et al., 2017).”
BackgroundSparse Semi-supervised Learning Using Conjugate Functions
Sun, S., & Shawe-Taylor, J. S. (2010) · Cited by 92
Plubell, D. L., Käll, L., Webb-Robertson, B.-J., Bramer, L. M., Ives, A., Kelleher, N. L., Smith, L. M., Montine, T. J., Wu, C. C., & MacCoss, M. J. (2022) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.1c00894 · Cited by 85 · cited 1×
“Finally, additional sources of uncertainty may arise from processes such as protein quantification in bottom-up proteomics (Rifai et al., 2006; Plubell et al., 2022) as measurements are made at the peptide level and isoforms can be difficult to identify (Forshed et al., 2011; Webb-Robertson et al.,…”
BackgroundSelf-citationBiological insights through omics data integration
Noor, E., Cherkaoui, S., & Sauer, U. (2019) · Current Opinion in Systems Biology · doi:10.1016/j.coisb.2019.03.007 · Cited by 83 · cited 2×
“…methods such as graph representations or other hard constraints on parameter representations with machine learning methods are ongoing (Noor et al., 2019; Lee and Kim, 2022), and evaluation and development of mechanisms for handling missing data within these frameworks will be…”
MethodIntegrative clustering methods of multi‐omics data for molecule‐based cancer classifications
Wang, D., & Gu, J. (2016) · Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1007/s40484-016-0063-4 · Cited by 81 · cited 1×
“…engineering ( Helmy et al., 2020), precision medicine (Hamamoto et al., 2019), amongst others (e.g., Mann et al., 2021; Lin et al., 2022; Zhou et al., 2022) and a majority focused on cancer research (e.g., Wang and Gu, 2016; Biswas and Chakrabarti, 2020; Nicora et al., 2020; Cai et al., 2022).”
BackgroundStructural Learning and Integrative Decomposition of Multi-View Data
Gaynanova, I., & Li, G. (2019) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/biom.13108 · Cited by 78 · cited 2×
“BIDIFAC + builds upon BIDIFAC (Park and Lock, 2019) and SLIDE (Gaynanova and Li, 2019), two extensions of the JIVE method (Lock et al., 2013) that yields matrix factorizations that convey a decomposition of data variability into variability shared across multiple ‘omics and variability primarily attributable to single…”
MethodMore effort — more results: recent advances in integrative ‘omics’ data analysis
Rajasundaram, D., & Selbig, J. (2016) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2015.12.010 · Cited by 67 · cited 2×
“…focus on integration for specific ‘omics data types, such as single cell ‘omics (Ma et al., 2020) or specific application areas, such as plant biology (Rajasundaram and Selbig, 2016), microbial communities (Fondi and Liò, 2015; Franzosa et al., 2015), cancer (Buescher and Driggers, 2016), and…”
BackgroundConflations of probability distributions
Hill, T. P. (2011) · Transactions of the American Mathematical Society · doi:10.1090/s0002-9947-2011-05340-7 · Cited by 56 · cited 2×
“Aggregation of these normal distributions is achieved through the process of statistical conflation (Hill, 2011), which involves taking the normalized product of the aggregated probability density functions.”
BackgroundAbela, L., Spiegel, R., Crowther, L. M., Klein, A., Steindl, K., Papuc, S. M., Joset, P., Zehavi, Y., Rauch, A., Plecko, B., et al. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176363 · Cited by 54 · cited 1×
“Other studies that involve rare diseases, the collection of difficult-to-access tissue, or smaller grants that do not allow for large consortium samples are characterized by similarly low sample sizes (Sirrs et al., 2015; Abela et al., 2017).”
BackgroundMixed-effects statistical model for comparative LC–MS proteomics studies
Daly, D. S., Anderson, K. K., Panisko, E. A., Purvine, S. O., Fang, R., Monroe, M. E., & Baker, S. E. (2008) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr070441i · Cited by 50 · cited 1×
“Peptides may be missing from one or more samples due to a variety of underlying mechanisms (Daly et al., 2008; Karpievitch et al., 2009), which can result in non-trivial amounts of potential observations being missing.”
BackgroundTOBMI: trans-omics block missing data imputation using a k-nearest neighbor weighted approach
Dong, X., Lin, L., Zhang, R., Zhao, Y., Christiani, D. C., Wei, Y., & Chen, F. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty796 · Cited by 50 · cited 1×
“Trans-Omics Block Missing Data Imputation (TOBMI; Dong et al., 2018) proposes a similar method, but imputed values are generated based on a weighted average of neighbors, with closer neighbors having greater weights.”
MethodZhou, X., Chai, H., Zhao, H., Luo, C., & Yang, Y. (2020) · GigaScience · doi:10.1093/gigascience/giaa076 · Cited by 50
A Review of Imputation Strategies for Isobaric Labeling-Based Shotgun Proteomics
Bramer, L. M., Irvahn, J., Piehowski, P. D., Rodland, K. D., & Webb-Robertson, B.-J. M. (2021) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00123 · Cited by 47 · cited 2×
“However, like mean imputation, imputed values from these approaches may distort feature distributions and lead to biased parameter and variability estimates (Lubin et al., 2004; Succop et al., 2004; Webb-Robertson et al., 2015; Lazar et al., 2016; Bramer et al., 2020).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationTermine, A., Fabrizio, C., Strafella, C., Caputo, V., Petrosini, L., Caltagirone, C., Giardina, E., & Cascella, R. (2021) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm11040280 · Cited by 47 · cited 1×
“, 2021) and challenges in applying AI and ML techniques to multi-omics data (e.g., Kang et al., 2021; Termine et al., 2021).”
Abela, L., Simmons, L., Steindl, K., Schmitt, B., Mastrangelo, M., Joset, P., Papuc, M., Sticht, H., Baumer, A., Crowther, L. M., et al. (2016) · Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease · doi:10.1007/s10545-015-9876-y · Cited by 43 · cited 1×
“For example, a study to identify biomarkers for Snyder Robinson syndrome, a rare neurological disorder, obtained data on 16 patients, only three of which presented with the disorder of interest (Abela et al., 2015).”
BackgroundPerspectives for better batch effect correction in mass-spectrometry-based proteomics
Phua, S.-X., Lim, K.-P., & Goh, W. W.-B. (2022) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2022.08.022 · Cited by 42 · cited 1×
“For example, batch effects are common and often much more pronounced in mass spectrometry-based data (Mertens, 2016; Phua et al., 2022; e.g., Han and Li, 2020), even when the same physical instrument is used and the same data type is being generated.”
BackgroundMatsuda, F., Tsugawa, H., & Fukusaki, E. (2013) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac401564v · Cited by 41 · cited 1×
“In untargeted metabolomics and lipidomics false discovery rates are difficult to compute and largely not accurate (Stein, 1994; Jeong et al., 2011; Matsuda et al., 2013; Kim and Zhang, 2014).”
BackgroundSamaraweera, M. A., Hall, L. M., Hill, D. W., & Grant, D. F. (2018) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03118 · Cited by 41 · cited 1×
“For small molecule measurements, such as metabolomics, manual verification of metabolites following identification scoring is required for shotgun metabolomics, as scoring methods are much less mature than for other ‘omics data types (Stein and Scott, 1994; Samaraweera et al., 2018).”
MethodBayesian Proteoform Modeling Improves Protein Quantification of Global Proteomic Measurements
Webb‐Robertson, B., Matzke, M. M., Datta, S., Payne, S., Kang, J., Bramer, L., Nicora, C., Shukla, A. K., Metz, T., Rodland, K., et al. (2014) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m113.030932 · Cited by 39 · cited 1×
“, 2022) as measurements are made at the peptide level and isoforms can be difficult to identify (Forshed et al., 2011; Webb-Robertson et al., 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationIntegration of artificial intelligence and multi-omics in kidney diseases
Zhou, S., Zhong, X., & Duan, L. (2022) · Fundamental Research · doi:10.1016/j.fmre.2022.01.037 · Cited by 37 · cited 3×
“…metabolic engineering ( Helmy et al., 2020), precision medicine (Hamamoto et al., 2019), amongst others (e.g., Mann et al., 2021; Lin et al., 2022; Zhou et al., 2022) and a majority focused on cancer research (e.g., Wang and Gu, 2016; Biswas and Chakrabarti, 2020; Nicora et al., 2020; Cai et al.,…”
BackgroundInfluentialBayesian integrative model for multi-omics data with missingness
Fang, Z., Ma, T., Tang, G., Zhu, L., Yan, Q., Wang, T., Celedón, J. C., Chen, W., & Tseng, G. C. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty775 · Cited by 34 · cited 3×
“When an assumption of MCAR or MAR is used, the missingness is said to be ignorable and methods designed to handle missing values are applied to both cases (Gelman and Hill, 2006; Fang et al., 2018; Wei et al., 2018).”
BackgroundMethodAdvanced bioinformatics methods for practical applications in proteomics
Goh, W. W. B., & Wong, L. (2017) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbx128 · Cited by 33 · cited 1×
“…isolation and solubilization, sequence ambiguity, and a lack of standards in statistical thresholds and algorithms result in inconsistent detection of large proportions of protein products that are detected, thus limiting the reproducibility of data collection and analysis (Goh and Wong, 2017).”
BackgroundForshed, J., Johansson, H. J., Pernemalm, M., Branca, R. M. M., Sandberg, A., & Lehtiö, J. (2011) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m111.010264 · Cited by 32 · cited 1×
“, 2022) as measurements are made at the peptide level and isoforms can be difficult to identify (Forshed et al., 2011; Webb-Robertson et al., 2014).”
BackgroundMulti-view clustering for multi-omics data using unified embedding
Mitra, S., Saha, S., & Hasanuzzaman, M. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-70229-1 · Cited by 32
Mertens, B. J. A. (2017) · Statistical Analysis of Proteomics, Metabolomics, and Lipidomics Data Using Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45809-0_1 · Cited by 30 · cited 2×
“effects are common and often much more pronounced in mass spectrometry-based data (Mertens, 2016; Phua et al., 2022; e.g., Han and Li, 2020), even when the same physical instrument is”
BackgroundLin, B., Ma, Y., & Wu, S. (2022) · OMICS A Journal of Integrative Biology · doi:10.1089/omi.2022.0079 · Cited by 30 · cited 1×
“, 2019), amongst others (e.g., Mann et al., 2021; Lin et al., 2022; Zhou et al., 2022) and a majority focused on cancer research (e.”
BackgroundHowey, R. A. J., Clark, A. D., Naamane, N., et al. (2021) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1009811 · Cited by 29
Defects in fatty acid amide hydrolase 2 in a male with neurologic and psychiatric symptoms
Sirrs, S., van Karnebeek, C. D., Peng, X., Shyr, C., Tarailo-Graovac, M., Mandal, R., Testa, D., Dubin, D., Carbonetti, G., Glynn, S. E., et al. (2015) · Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases · doi:10.1186/s13023-015-0248-3 · Cited by 28 · cited 1×
“Other studies that involve rare diseases, the collection of difficult-to-access tissue, or smaller grants that do not allow for large consortium samples are characterized by similarly low sample sizes (Sirrs et al., 2015; Abela et al., 2017).”
BackgroundJeong, J., Shi, X., Zhang, X., Kim, S., & Shen, C. (2011) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-392 · Cited by 27 · cited 1×
“In untargeted metabolomics and lipidomics false discovery rates are difficult to compute and largely not accurate (Stein, 1994; Jeong et al., 2011; Matsuda et al., 2013; Kim and Zhang, 2014).”
MethodA network embedding based method for partial multi-omics integration in cancer subtyping
Xu, H., Gao, L., Huang, M., & Duan, R. (2020) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.08.001 · Cited by 27 · cited 1×
“A more recent approach, Multiple Similarity Network Embedding (MSNE; Xu et al., 2021) modifies NEMO’s original framework to overcome limitations in the patterns of missing data that can be accommodated.”
MethodMONET: Multi-omic module discovery by omic selection
Rappoport, N., Safra, R., & Shamir, R. (2020) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008182 · Cited by 26 · cited 2×
“Multi Omics clustering by Non-Exhaustive Types (MONET; Rappoport et al., 2020) is a clustering algorithm that defines “modules”, which are clusters formed based on subsets of different data views.”
MethodMerging Multiple Omics Datasets In Silico: Statistical Analyses and Data Interpretation
Arakawa, K., & Tomita, M. (2013) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-299-5_23 · Cited by 24 · cited 1×
“…of these review articles have focused specifically on the availability of software tools and discussions of preprocessing considerations (e.g., Arakawa and Tomita, 2013; Misra et al., 2019), or on providing perspective on challenges in multi-omics integration (e.g., Gomez-Cabrero et al.,…”
BackgroundIntegrative factorization of bidimensionally linked matrices
Park, J. Y., & Lock, E. F. (2019) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/biom.13141 · Cited by 23 · cited 10×
“Traditional multi-omics considers the integration of several different ‘omics for the same set of samples, whereas the integration considered by BIDIFAC + involves combining different ‘omics and different sample sets.”
MethodInfluentialDeepMF: deciphering the latent patterns in omics profiles with a deep learning method
Chen, L., Xu, J., & Li, S. C. (2019) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-019-3291-6 · Cited by 23 · cited 1×
“DeepMF (Chen et al., 2019) casts traditional matrix factorization within a deep learning framework to map concatenated multiomics data to a lower-dimensional latent space.”
TiMEG: an integrative statistical method for partially missing multi-omics data
Das, S., & Mukhopadhyay, I. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-03034-z · Cited by 22 · cited 1×
“Introduced by Das and Mukhopadhyay (2021), TiMEG (Tool for integrating Methylation, gene Expression and Genotype) is a supervised learning approach for the identification of disease-associated biomarkers in case-control multi-omics studies.”
BackgroundJoint association and classification analysis of multi‐view data
Zhang, Y., & Gaynanova, I. (2021) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/biom.13536 · Cited by 20 · cited 1×
“Joint association and classification analysis (JACA; Zhang and Gaynanova, 2021) is a semi-supervised approach that enables quantification of inter-omic associations with respect to known classifications or data subtypes.”
Bidimensional linked matrix factorization for pan-omics pan-cancer analysis
Lock, E. F., Park, J. Y., & Hoadley, K. A. (2022) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/21-aoas1495 · Cited by 19 · cited 1×
“Unique from most other approaches described in this review, BIDIFAC + (Lock et al., 2022) is a matrix factorization approach for bi-dimensionally linked matrices.”
MethodLiang, K. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1533/9781908818232.49 · Cited by 19
Detecting molecular subtypes from multi-omics datasets using SUMO
Sienkiewicz, K., Chen, J., Chatrath, A., Lawson, J. T., Sheffield, N. C., Zhang, L., & Ratan, A. (2022) · Cell Reports Methods · doi:10.1016/j.crmeth.2021.100152 · Cited by 18 · cited 5×
“As well, the range of adjusted rand index values (the performance metric used) was typically observed to be narrower for SUMO, suggesting less variability in expected performance.”
BackgroundInfluentialA general framework for integrative analysis of incomplete multiomics data
Lin, D., Zeng, D., & Couper, D. (2020) · Genetic Epidemiology · doi:10.1002/gepi.22328 · Cited by 16 · cited 2×
“Emphasizing analyses more consistent with a causal framework, iMODA (Lin et al., 2020) proposes a hierarchical regression framework for quantifying (i) the effects of genotypes on quantitative ‘omics, (ii) the effects of quantitative ‘omics on response phenotypes of interest, and (iii) the direct and indirect effects…”
MethodDiscovery of false identification using similarity difference in GC–MS‐based metabolomics
Kim, S., & Zhang, X. (2014) · Journal of Chemometrics · doi:10.1002/cem.2665 · Cited by 15 · cited 1×
“In untargeted metabolomics and lipidomics false discovery rates are difficult to compute and largely not accurate (Stein, 1994; Jeong et al., 2011; Matsuda et al., 2013; Kim and Zhang, 2014).”
BackgroundscMoC: single-cell multi-omics clustering
Eltager, M., Abdelaal, T., Mahfouz, A. E., & Reinders, M. J. T. (2022) · Bioinformatics Advances · doi:10.1093/bioadv/vbac011 · Cited by 13
Ni, Z., Zheng, X., Zheng, X. K., & Zou, X. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2020.3025804 · Cited by 12 · cited 1×
“Last, Ni et al. (2022) introduce scLRTD, an imputation approach based on approximating a third-order tensor representation of the multi-omics dataset with a low-rank approximation.”
MethodLee, D., & Kim, S. (2021) · Korean Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.3345/cep.2021.01438 · Cited by 10
Model-based joint visualization of multiple compositional omics datasets
Hawinkel, S., Bijnens, L., Cao, K.-A. L., & Thas, O. (2020) · NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/nargab/lqaa050 · Cited by 9 · cited 2×
“, 2018), Compositional Omics ModelBased Integration (COMBI; Hawinkel et al., 2020) introduces model extensions better suited for modeling compositional and sequence count data.”
BackgroundCoupling Deep Imputation with Multitask Learning for Downstream Tasks on Genomics DataPreprint
Peacock, S., Jacob, E., & Burlutskiy, N. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.13705 · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Achille, 2017, Emergence of invariance and disentanglement in deep representations, J. Machine Learn. Res., 19, 1, 10.48550/arxiv.1706.01350 · DOI
- A variational information bottleneck approach to multi-omics data integration,15131521 LeeC. van der SchaarM. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics2021
- Sindhwani, 2005, A co-regularization approach to semi-supervised learning with multiple views,
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deep learning-based approaches for multi-omics data integration and analysis
Ballard, J. L., Wang, Z., Li, W., Shen, L., & Long, Q. (2024) · BioData Mining · doi:10.1186/s13040-024-00391-z · Cited by 301
“The former results in a reduced sample size while not allowing the full usage of all information contained in the dataset, and the samples with missing values may not be a random subset of the data [101].”
BackgroundBaião, A. R., Cai, Z., Poulos, R. C., Robinson, P. J., Reddel, R. R., Zhong, Q., Vinga, S., & Gonçalves, E. (2025) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaf355 · Cited by 274
Cembrowska-Lech, D., Krzemińska, A., Miller, T. I., Nowakowska, A., Adamski, C., Radaczyńska, M., Mikiciuk, G., & Mikiciuk, M. (2023) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology12101298 · Cited by 193
“Moreover, AI and machine learning techniques can be leveraged to analyze the large and complex datasets generated by these methods, revealing hidden patterns and predictive models of plant phenotypes [56–58].”
BackgroundRevolutionizing multi‐omics analysis with artificial intelligence and data processing
Yetgin, A. (2025) · Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1002/qub2.70002 · Cited by 174
“Due to the size and complexity of the data produced by various omics technologies, AI and data processing are essential elements in multi ‐ omics analysis [16].”
Acharya, D., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2024) · Briefings in Functional Genomics · doi:10.1093/bfgp/elae013 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Flores, J. E., Claborne, D. M., Weller, Z. D., Webb-Robertson, B.-J. M., Waters, K. M., & Bramer, L. M.
- Affiliations
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bramer, Lisa M.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2023-02-09
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 1098308-1098308
- ISSN
- 2624-8212 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9949722
- OpenAlex
- W4319759388
- Semantic Scholar
- d833d42089ae664847832f8c0ef7bd7f6c1e26b6
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 148
- Citations by year
- 2026: 55 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 11
- FWCI
- 4.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- missing data, multi-omics integration, artificial intelligence, statistical learning, missing data imputation, data heterogeneity, biological systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review