Spirulina supported plant growth in regolith simulants and elevated levels of CO2
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: A key element for sustainable off-world habitation is the ability to grow food through in-situ resource utilization (ISRU). Growth substrates are required to overcome the challenges of ISRU in the space environment, including the use of regolith. Biofertilizers such as algae are a promising avenue for supporting plant growth with ISRU; algae can potentially mitigate the lack of nutrients, alkalinity, heavy-metal contamination, poor water-carrying capacity, and presence of perchlorates in regolith as well as increase plant growth at elevated levels of atmospheric CO 2 . The blue-green cyanobacterium Arthrospira platensis is an ionizing radiation resistant strain with high temperature tolerance and nutritional properties. It has been used successfully as a bio-fertilizer in heavy metal contaminated, highly alkaline terrestrial soils Methods: Our research is a large-scale investigation of the efficacy of spirulina to enhance the growth of Raphanus sativus (Organic Daikon radish) microgreens using lunar and Martian regolith simulants. We present a study of growth for a wide range of regolith simulant-soil mixtures as a function of fertilizer concentration and the level of environmental CO 2 . Results: Spirulina boosts growth for radish microgreens significantly; Martian regolith simulant with 0.6% spirulina under elevated CO 2 yielded the best results. Water-only groups declined after the initial growth phase; spirulina fertilized groups maintained steady growth rates over the full growing period. Regolith simulant type influenced biomass more than height, with the best growth found in Martian rather than lunar regolith simulant. No difference was found between the different regolith simulant-to-soil mixtures. Discussion: This research advances the application of ISRU to enhance self-sufficient, sustainable space exploration and resource use. In this research, spirulina fertilization compensated for the non-nutritive properties of regolith, supporting plant growth without the addition of terrestrial soils. This work suggests that spirulina can serve as an effective biofertilizer in soil farming practices using ISRU as a potential means of supporting off-world habitation.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Spirulina fertilization significantly enhanced Daikon radish microgreen growth in lunar and Martian regolith simulants under ambient and elevated CO₂, with the best results for Martian simulant plus 0.6% spirulina under elevated CO₂. The study supports spirulina as a biofertilizer for in-situ resource utilization, though reproductive capacity remained constrained and several substrate/atmospheric confounds limit interpretation.
Key findings
- Spirulina-treated plants grew at least twofold more than water-only controls at ambient CO₂, with significant differences for all concentrations (e.g., 0.6% spirulina: t(8)=19.24, p<0.001 lunar; t(7)=31.77, p<0.001 Martian). Water-only groups declined after initial growth, while spirulina groups maintained steady or slightly increasing growth.
- Martian regolith simulant with 0.6% spirulina under elevated CO₂ yielded the strongest median growth in PCA; under elevated CO₂, mean dry biomass rose from 1.02 g in controls to 1.45 g for 3 g spirulina and peaked at 1.73 g for 7 g spirulina (ambient: 0.94 g, 1.26 g, 1.45 g).
- No significant difference was found between regolith simulant-to-soil mixtures and pure simulant groups; regolith type influenced biomass more than height, with Martian simulant generally healthier than lunar. Leaf counts increased 1.4× with 0.2% spirulina and 1.5× with 0.6% versus controls.
- Statistical tests confirmed spirulina dosage effects (repeated measures ANOVA F(2,24)=12.31, p<0.001; two-way ANOVA main effect F(2,36)=18.02, p<0.001), CO₂ main effect (F(1,36)=9.84, p=0.003), and interaction (F(2,36)=4.65, p=0.016).
Methods
- A total of 720 Raphanus sativus var. longipinnatus (organic Daikon radish) microgreens were grown in 72 treatment groups (10 replicates each) across two chambers, using lunar (LMS-1) or Martian (MGS-1S) regolith simulants mixed with bonsai soil at 0/100, 85/15, 90/10, 95/5, and 100/0 ratios.
- Treatments included ambient (400 ppm) vs elevated (1,200 ppm) CO₂ and spirulina concentrations of 0.2%, 0.6%, and 1.4% applied every other day, with water-only controls; plants grew 40+ days, with some groups harvested at day 44 and others at day 64.
- Measurements included vertical height, plant volume, leaf count and Munsell color, wet/dry biomass, and root metrics; analyses used t-tests, repeated measures ANOVA, two-way ANOVA, MANOVA, Tukey HSD, and principal component analysis.
Limitations
- The paper states that manufactured regolith simulants may not accurately mimic actual lunar and Martian regolith; the study was limited to short-cycle microgreens; other atmospheric variables such as ethylene were not controlled; sphagnum moss liners meant plants grew in mixed substrates rather than pure simulants; baseline nutrient content was assumed from manufacturer specifications and not independently verified; and different harvest times (day 44 vs day 64) may limit direct biomass/leaf/root comparisons.
- The paper also notes that a supplementary fan and dehumidifiers were applied only to the high-CO₂ chamber, introducing potential confounds for late-stage leaf color and health metrics.
- Evident from the text: seed formation was rare and occurred only under high CO₂, so reproductive outcomes are weakly characterized; the study’s growth chamber interventions and mixed moss substrate complicate isolation of regolith-simulant effects.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
18 of 38 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 2 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Terrestrial studies have confirmed the efficacy of spirulina in supporting the growth of a variety of legumes, tomato, and lettuce varieties.
“Additionally, terrestrial studies have confirmed the efficacy of spirulina in supporting the growth of a variety of legumes, tomato, and lettuce varieties (Shedeed et al., 2022;Bhowmik et al., 2010;Taha et al., 2023;Anitha et al., 2016;Akgul and Akgul, 2019),”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Shedeed et al., 2022 source
Section 3.1 (page unavailable) reports that 0.25% Spirulina platensis extract significantly improved growth of Lupinus luteus, a legume, compared with controls. This paper's own experiment does not establish growth benefits for a variety of legumes, tomatoes, or lettuce; it also reports growth inhibition at the highest concentration tested. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Bhowmik et al., 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Taha et al., 2023 source
The Results section (page not provided) reports that Spirulina platensis increased growth measures in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), a legume. This paper does not establish effects across a variety of legumes or in tomato and lettuce; those parts of the jointly cited sentence are not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
Leaf counts showed direct dependence on spirulina concentration.
“Leaf counts show a direct dependence on the concentration of spirulina treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No difference was noted for water-only plants grown at ambient CO2 between lunar and Martian simulants.
“No difference is noted for the water-only plants grown at ambient CO 2 (Figure 8).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Repeated measures ANOVA confirmed significant differences in growth rate as a function of spirulina dosage (F(2,24)=12.31, p<0.001).
“A repeated measures ANOVA confirms the significant differences in growth rate as a function of spirulina dosage (F (2,24) = 12.31, p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No significant difference in vertical growth was found between ambient and high CO2 for both regolith simulants.
“No significant difference is noted between growth under ambient vs. high CO 2 for both regolith simulants (see Figures 789); both the initial growth rates and the sustained growth during the plateau period are similar regardless of CO 2 profile.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Plants in lunar simulant developed comparable numbers of true leaves to those grown in Martian simulant.
“Plants in lunar regolith simulant develop comparable numbers of true leaves to those grown in Martian regolith simulant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
No significant difference in growth was found between regolith simulant-soil mixtures and pure simulant groups for any experimental condition, for both lunar and Martian simulants.
“No significant difference in growth (including both growth timeframe and overall growth) was noted between simulant-soil mixtures and pure simulant groups for any of the experimental conditions; this was true for both lunar and Martian regolith simulant”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
MANOVA confirmed combined effects of CO2, regolith simulant, and spirulina on plant growth (Wilks' Lambda=0.72, F=3.09, p=0.002).
“MANOVA results also confirm the combined effects of CO 2 , regolith simulant, and spirulina on plant growth (Wilks' Λ = 0.72, F = 3.09, p = 0.002).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A strong increasing growth trend was noted for plants receiving spirulina treatment in plant volume.
“A strong increasing growth trend is noted for the plants which received the spirulina treatment (Figure 13).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Average plateau height was a factor of two higher for all groups receiving any spirulina concentration compared to water-only groups.
“Growth is a factor of two higher for all groups which received any concentration of spirulina treatment compared to the water-only groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Post-hoc Tukey HSD confirmed water-only groups were statistically different (p<0.01) from all spirulina-treated groups for both simulant types and both CO2 levels.
“Post-hoc comparisons using the Turkey HSD test confirm that the water-only groups are statistically different (p < 0.01) than all of the groups which received the spirulina treatment for both types of regolith simulant and at both ambient and high levels of CO 2 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Plants grown at high CO2 exhibited slightly higher vertical growth than those at ambient CO2, in both water-only and spirulina-fertilized groups.
“Compared with the plant groups grown at ambient levels of CO 2 , the plants grown at high levels of CO 2 exhibit slightly higher levels of growth; this is seen in the water-only groups as well as the spirulina-fertilized groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Spirulina treatment increased vertical plant height by a factor of two or more compared to water-only groups at ambient CO2.
“The plants which received the spirulina treatment show a factor of two or more increased growth compared to the water-only groups at ambient levels of CO 2 ; they also demonstrate sustained growth throughout the study”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Under elevated CO2, water-only groups showed a strong declining vertical growth trend after day 19.
“One notable difference is the strong declining trend after day 19 for the water-only groups (slope = -0.075(lunar); -0.066 (Martian)).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For all plants, growth in Martian simulant mixtures was similar or slightly higher than in lunar simulant mixtures.
“For all plants growth in the Martian regolith simulant mixtures is similar or slightly higher than in lunar regolith simulant mixtures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Overall vertical growth increased as spirulina concentration increased.
“In general, overall growth is seen to increase as the concentration of spirulina treatment increases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Plants grown in Martian regolith simulant under elevated CO2 with 0.6% spirulina treatment had a general appearance of greater health, with thicker, stronger, and healthier stems and leaves.
“The plants grown in Martian regolith simulant under elevated CO 2 , which received the 0.6% spirulina treatment had a general appearance of greater health: their stems and leaves were observed to be thicker, stronger, and healthier.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The 0.6% spirulina concentration yielded the largest gains in plant growth metrics.
“In these results, the 0.6% concentration yielded the largest gains in plant growth metrics,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Growth was achieved for all plant groups.
“Growth was achieved for all plant groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No difference was found between the different regolith simulant-to-soil mixtures.
“No difference was found between the different regolith simulant-to-soil mixtures,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All seed formation occurred under high-CO2 conditions.
“All seed formation occurred under high-CO 2 conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Plants grown in lunar regolith simulant mixtures required more frequent watering and larger amounts of water to maintain the same soil moisture levels as the Martian regolith simulant mixtures.
“Plants grown in lunar regolith simulant mixtures also required more frequent watering and larger amounts of water in order to maintain the same soil moisture levels as the Martian regolith simulant mixtures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The effect size of spirulina on dry biomass was greater under elevated CO2 than under ambient CO2.
“the effect size is greater under elevated CO 2 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The concentration of environmental CO2 produced differences in the color data for plant groups.
“The concentration of environmental CO 2 produced differences in the color data for plant groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The strongest growth trends and healthiest plants were those in the Martian regolith simulation as opposed to lunar.
“The strongest growth trends and healthiest plants were those in the Martian regolith simulation as opposed to lunar;”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
R. sativus plants grew in all soil-regolith simulant mixtures.
“In general, the R. Sativus plants grew in all soil-regolith simulant mixtures, exhibiting expected growth profiles over time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
No major differences in root development or health resulted from the addition of bonsai soil to the regolith simulant.
“Importantly, no major differences in root development or health resulted from the addition of bonsai soil to the regolith simulant,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Leaf color showed strong variation with the amount of fertilization, with water-only or lower spirulina treatments producing more yellow-green leaves compared to the deep greens found in plants cultivated with higher spirulina concentrations.
“Leaf color, a qualitative measure of photosynthesis, showed a strong variation with the amount of fertilization, with plants that received only water or lower concentrations of spirulina treatment producing leaves that were more yellow-green compared to the deep greens found in the plants cultivated with higher spirulina concentrations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Leaf color is a valid qualitative measure of photosynthesis and plant health.
- Findingreasoning
The high CO2 plants developed more quickly than expected from terrestrial timetables.
“The high CO 2 plants developed more quickly than expected from terrestrial timetables;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The most significant differences in all plant metrics, both qualitative and quantitative, resulted from variations in the amount of spirulina fertilizer used for the treatment.
“The most significant differences in all plant metrics, both qualitative and quantitative, resulted from variations in the amount of spirulina fertilizer used for the treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Flowers were observed in approximately 20%-30% of the plants.
“Flowers were observed in approximately 20%-30% of the plants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
This project demonstrates the potential of spirulina supplementation to enhance the growth of radish microgreens in lunar and Martian regolith simulants under both elevated and ambient CO2 conditions.
“This project demonstrates the potential of spirulina supplementation to enhance the growth of radish microgreens in lunar and Martian regolith simulants under both elevated and ambient CO 2 conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Manufactured regolith simulants are adequate proxies for actual lunar and Martian regolith for assessing plant growth in space agriculture.
- Interpretationown data
Spirulina fertilization can compensate for the non-nutritive properties of regolith, supporting plant growth without the addition of terrestrial soils.
“suggesting that spirulina fertilization can compensate for the non-nutritive properties of regolith, supporting plant growth without the addition of terrestrial soils.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Manufactured regolith simulants are adequate proxies for actual lunar and Martian regolith for assessing plant growth in space agriculture.
- Interpretationown data
Water-only control plants showed significant signs of distress due to the non-nutritive growing conditions.
“The water-only control plants showed significant signs of distress due to the non-nutritive growing conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Water-only growing conditions are non-nutritive.
- Premisecitation
Under terrestrial conditions, plants fertilized with spirulina exhibit increased biomass.
“Under terrestrial conditions, plants fertilized with spirulina exhibit increased biomass (Singh, 2014), enhanced photosynthetic pigment content, improved growth and yield rates (Shedeed et al., 2022), greater productivity including marketable yield and nitrogen fixation (Geries and Elsadany, 2021), and elevated micronutrient content (Anitha et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Singh, 2014 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Augmentation of regolith simulants with spirulina may alleviate the need to transport terrestrial soil for space agriculture endeavors.
“This suggests that the augmentation of regolith simulants with spirulina is sufficient may alleviate the need to transport terrestrial soil for space agriculture endeavors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Manufactured regolith simulants are adequate proxies for actual lunar and Martian regolith for assessing plant growth in space agriculture.
- Interpretationreasoning
This work suggests that spirulina can serve as an effective biofertilizer in soil farming practices using ISRU as a potential means of supporting off-world habitation.
“This work suggests that spirulina can serve as an effective biofertilizer in soil farming practices using ISRU as a potential means of supporting off-world habitation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Manufactured regolith simulants are adequate proxies for actual lunar and Martian regolith for assessing plant growth in space agriculture.
- Interpretationreasoning
The application of spirulina, which enhances water-holding and nutrient-binding, accentuated differences between lunar and Martian simulants.
“The application of spirulina, which enhances water-holding and nutrient-binding, accentuated differences between lunar and Martian simulants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
These results suggest the efficacy of spirulina as a biofertilizer capable of supporting plant growth in regolith simulant and high CO2 environments.
“These results clearly suggest the efficacy of spirulina as a biofertilizer capable of supporting plant growth in regolith simulant and high CO 2 environments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Manufactured regolith simulants are adequate proxies for actual lunar and Martian regolith for assessing plant growth in space agriculture.
- Premisecitation
Perchlorates in Martian regolith inhibit plant growth even with nutritional supplementation.
“The presence of perchlorates in Martian regolith is an additional challenge as it has been shown to inhibit plant growth even with nutritional supplementation (Eichler et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eichler et al., 2021 source
- Interpretationreasoning
The synergy between spirulina and elevated CO2 is attributed to complementary physiological and biochemical mechanisms.
“This synergy is attributed to complementary physiological and biochemical mechanisms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
This study suggests that spirulina could play an important role in supporting ISRU in cultivation efforts by eliminating the need to transport terrestrial soils to support healthy plant growth.
“This study suggests that spirulina could play an important role in supporting ISRU in cultivation efforts by eliminating the need to transport terrestrial soils to support healthy plant growth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Manufactured regolith simulants are adequate proxies for actual lunar and Martian regolith for assessing plant growth in space agriculture.
- Interpretationcitation
The results reported here may have applicability beyond radish microgreens.
“suggesting that the results reported here may have applicability beyond radish microgreens.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The increased water holding capacity of the sphagnum moss was sufficient to alleviate compression and compacting behaviors in both lunar and Martian regolith simulants used.
“suggesting that the increased water holding capacity of the sphagnum moss was sufficient to alleviate compression and compacting behaviors in both lunar and Martian regolith simulants used.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The faster development of high CO2 plants is likely a response to environmental stressors compounding the limited nutrient availability in the soil mixtures.
“this is likely a response to the environmental stressors compounding the limited nutrient availability in the soil mixtures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The difference in growth time (44 vs 64 days) may limit direct comparisons for final biomass, leaf count, and root development.
“The difference in growth time was due to lifecycle completion but may limit direct comparisons for final biomass, leaf count, root development.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Space habitats often maintain elevated CO2 concentrations (700-1,000 ppm) to promote crop productivity.
“Space habitats often maintain elevated CO 2 concentrations (700-1,000 ppm) to promote crop productivity (Zabel et al., 2022;NASA, 2022), and pockets of CO 2 which exceed those limits have been reported on the International Space Station (ISS) (Georgescu et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Zabel et al., 2022 source
- cites NASA, 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
Optimum growth can be achieved with a mid-range spirulina concentration.
“suggesting that optimum growth can be achieved with a mid-range concentration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Spirulina delivers essential macro- and micronutrients such as nitrogen, iron, magnesium, and potassium, all of which are typically scarce in Martian and lunar regolith simulants.
“Simultaneously, spirulina delivers essential macro-and micronutrients such as nitrogen, iron, magnesium, and potassium, all of which are typically scarce in Martian and lunar regolith simulants (Jones et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jones et al., 2016 source
- May combine two claims. 75
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 26
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBoth lunar and Martian regolith lack water-carrying capacity.
“In addition, both lunar and Martian regolith lack water-carrying capacity (Wamelink et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Wamelink et al., 2014 source
The Discussion (page unavailable) says the Martian soil simulant held water better than the lunar simulant and Earth control, while the lunar simulant dried out fastest. The paper calls for further research on the physical characteristics of actual extraterrestrial soils; it does not establish that both regoliths lack water-holding capacity. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGrowth rates in regolith simulants tend to be slower and plants often exhibit signs of phenotypic stress.
“However, growth rates tend to be slower, and plants often exhibit signs of phenotypic stress (Paul et al., 2022), including a decline in telomere dynamics and a loss of sustainable genome integrity (Barcenilla et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Paul et al., 2022 source
In “Plant growth in three sources of lunar regolith” (page not provided), the paper reports that plants in actual Apollo lunar regolith grew more slowly and sometimes showed stress phenotypes. It says the opposite about the JSC-1A simulant: those plants maintained a consistently higher growth rate. The claim reverses which substrate produced the slower, stressed plants. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Barcenilla et al., 2024 source
The Results report shorter telomeres and reduced telomerase activity in Arabidopsis grown in lunar regolith simulant. The paper describes long-term genome integrity as potentially unsustainable, not as an observed loss. The slower growth and phenotypic stress in the citing sentence are attributed to Paul et al. (2022), not to this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRegolith lacks a natural biome and is deficient in essential macronutrients such as nitrogen and micronutrients including copper, zinc, and boron.
“Unlike terrestrial soil, it lacks a natural biome and is deficient in essential macronutrients such as nitrogen, as well as key micronutrients including copper, zinc, and boron (Eichler et al., 2021;Duri et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Eichler et al., 2021 source
- cites Duri et al., 2022 source
The Abstract says regolith lacks a microbiome, and the Conclusion says simulants lack key macronutrients including nitrogen. Section 3 describes copper, zinc, and boron as potentially deficient, while §2.2 says they occur in trace concentrations in minerals; the paper does not establish the categorical micronutrient deficiency stated in the claim. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSpirulina is part of the Microcoleaceae family, known for its nutritional properties and rapid growth.
“Spirulina is part of the Microcoleaceae family, known for its nutritional properties and rapid growth (Fais et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Fais et al., 2022 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn terrestrial soils, Microcoleaceae contribute to soil aggregation and stability.
“In terrestrial soils, they contribute to soil aggregation and stability (Rashid et al., 2016), increase the water-holding capacity and nutrient content of degraded soils (Singh et al., 2016), and enhance salt tolerance, disease resistance, and polysaccharide production (Singh, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Rashid et al., 2016 source
Sections 4.1 and 4 describe how bacteria contribute to soil aggregate formation and stability. The paper does not identify Microcoleaceae or establish that this particular family has that role; the citation supports the general mechanism, not the taxon-specific claim. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUnder terrestrial conditions, spirulina fertilization enhances photosynthetic pigment content and improves growth and yield rates.
“Under terrestrial conditions, plants fertilized with spirulina exhibit increased biomass (Singh, 2014), enhanced photosynthetic pigment content, improved growth and yield rates (Shedeed et al., 2022), greater productivity including marketable yield and nitrogen fixation (Geries and Elsadany, 2021), and elevated micronutrient content (Anitha et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Shedeed et al., 2022 source
The Abstract reports increased photosynthetic pigments, growth and yield in Lupinus luteus treated with 0.25% Spirulina extract. It also reports that 1.0% inhibited growth. The citing sentence generalizes the benefit to plants fertilized with Spirulina without the species and concentration qualifications. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationUnder terrestrial conditions, spirulina fertilization elevates micronutrient content.
“Under terrestrial conditions, plants fertilized with spirulina exhibit increased biomass (Singh, 2014), enhanced photosynthetic pigment content, improved growth and yield rates (Shedeed et al., 2022), greater productivity including marketable yield and nitrogen fixation (Geries and Elsadany, 2021), and elevated micronutrient content (Anitha et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Anitha et al., 2016 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMicrocoleaceae increase water-holding capacity and nutrient content of degraded soils.
“In terrestrial soils, they contribute to soil aggregation and stability (Rashid et al., 2016), increase the water-holding capacity and nutrient content of degraded soils (Singh et al., 2016), and enhance salt tolerance, disease resistance, and polysaccharide production (Singh, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Singh et al., 2016 source
The sections on cyanobacteria under extreme environments and reclamation of salt-affected soils say cyanobacteria can improve soil water-holding capacity and raise carbon and nitrogen levels in poor soils. The paper identifies Microcoleus chthonoplastes as a cyanobacterium in Table 1, but does not establish these effects specifically for Microcoleaceae. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPlant growth in lunar and Martian regolith simulants is possible when nutrient supplementation is provided, particularly for simulants with lower pH levels.
“Their findings show that growth is possible when nutrient supplementation is provided, particularly for simulants with lower pH levels (Eichler et al., 2021;Chinnannan et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Eichler et al., 2021 source
- cites Chinnannan et al., 2023 source
The Introduction reports that nutrient-supplemented lunar and Martian regolith simulants can support sweet potato growth, citing a prior study. The Discussion says supplementation is necessary for crop growth in Martian simulant. Neither passage links better growth to lower simulant pH, and the lunar-and-Martian finding is reported from prior work rather than this paper’s own experiment. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMicrocoleaceae have been shown to improve soil fertility and support healthy plant growth.
“Microcoleaceae have been shown to improve soil fertility and support healthy plant growth (Singh et al., 2016;Shariatmadari et al., 2013;Rai et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Singh et al., 2016 source
The ‘Cyanobacteria in Sustainable Management’ section says cyanobacteria can restore soil fertility and stimulate plant growth; the ‘Plant Growth Promoters’ section describes reported growth benefits. The paper lists Microcoleus chthonoplastes among cyanobacteria, but the cited passages do not establish these benefits specifically for Microcoleaceae. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Shariatmadari et al., 2013 source
The Results ('Cyanobacterial extracts as inoculants for vegetable crops'; page unavailable) report improved growth in vegetables treated with cyanobacterial extracts. But the Discussion identifies the studied Anabaena and Nostoc as members of Nostocaceae, not Microcoleaceae. Its discussion of soil fertility also concerns cyanobacteria generally or Nostoc, so it does not establish the claim for Microcoleaceae. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Rai et al., 2019 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationElevated CO2 reduces transpiration and produces plants with lower nutritional content, including smaller percentages of nitrogen, zinc, iron, and protein.
“Elevated levels of CO 2 have been shown to reduce transpiration and produce plants which have lower nutritional content with smaller percentages of nitrogen, zinc, iron, and protein (Loladze, 2002;Myers et al., 2014;Morison and Lawlor, 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Loladze, 2002 source
- cites Myers et al., 2014 source
In “Rising CO2 threatens human nutrition” (page not provided), the paper reports lower zinc and iron concentrations in C3 grasses and legumes and lower protein in C3 grasses grown under elevated CO2. It discusses changes in nitrogen content and proposes reduced transpiration-driven nitrogen transport as a possible mechanism, but does not establish that transpiration was reduced or report lower nitrogen percentages across plants. The claim also omits the paper’s limits: protein was not significantly reduced in soybeans or C4 crops. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Morison and Lawlor, 1999 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn stressed soils, spirulina treatments have led to increases in yield production, improved photosynthetic rates, and decreased oxidative as well as DNA damage.
“In stressed soils, spirulina treatments have led to increases in yield production, improved photosynthetic rates, and decreased oxidative as well as DNA damage (Taha et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Taha et al., 2023 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFor radish plants, application of spirulina leads to increased root length, wet mass, and chlorophyll content.
“For radish plants in particular, the application of spirulina leads to increased root length, wet mass, and chlorophyll content (Godlewska et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Godlewska et al., 2019 source
The section on morphological indicators of radish seedlings reports increased above-ground length and examines wet mass; the Discussion reports treatments with the highest wet mass and chlorophyll content. The cited paper does not establish increased root length: its length measurements concern above-ground biomass (page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn terrestrial studies, elevated CO2 levels have shown increased plant growth and leaf production as well as reduced water usage.
“In terrestrial studies, elevated levels of CO 2 have shown increased plant growth and leaf production as well as reduced water usage (Prior et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Prior et al., 2011 source
The PLANT GROWTH section says elevated CO₂ increases plant growth, and PLANT WATER RELATIONS reports reduced transpiration. The retrieved passages do not establish increased leaf production. They also caution that reduced transpiration does not always mean reduced whole-plant water use: larger plants can use more water despite improved water-use efficiency (page not available in our copy). (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataGrowth in ambient CO2 was slightly higher during the plateau period than in elevated CO2 for all plant groups except those receiving 1.4% spirulina, where the trend was reversed.
“Growth in ambient CO 2 is slightly higher during the plateau period than in elevated CO 2 for all plant groups except those which received the 1.4% spirulina treatment, where the trend is reversed (Figure 7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataANOVA confirmed variance was between groups, not within groups, supporting no significant difference for different soil-to-regolith simulant mixtures.
“The ANOVA tests confirm that the variance is between groups, not within groups; this supports the statement that there is no significant difference observed for the different soil-to-regolith simulant mixtures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn 100% regolith simulants, water-only groups had significantly lower growth than spirulina-treated groups at both ambient and high CO2, for both lunar and Martian simulants.
“For these plant groups, the water-only groups demonstrate significantly lower levels of growth during both the initial growth phase and the plateau period compared with plants which received the spirulina treatment (t (46) = 6.76, p < 0.001 (lunar); t (36) = 4.96, p < 0.001 (Martian) at ambient CO 2 ; t (46) = 10.05,p < 0.001 (lunar); t (47) = 9.03, p < 0.001 (Martian) at high CO 2 ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor spirulina-treated plants, higher growth rates were seen in Martian simulant for all spirulina concentrations at ambient CO2, but no noticeable difference between lunar and Martian simulants at high CO2.
“For the spirulina-treated plants, higher growth rates are seen for the plants grown in Martian regolith simulant for all spirulina concentrations at ambient CO 2 ; there is no noticeable difference between growth in lunar and Martian regolith simulants for any concentration of spirulina at high CO 2 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWater-only plants showed a bell curve-like growth profile in volume, demonstrating decline in overall plant growth over time.
“The water-only plants show a bell curve-like growth profile; the volume measurements clearly demonstrate the decline in overall plant growth over time (see Figure 13).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPlant volume in Martian simulant showed similar trends but volumes were reduced by 15% for plants grown in ambient CO2, and increased by 35%-40% for groups grown in elevated CO2.
“Plants grown in Martian regolith simulant show similar trends but with volumes reduced by 15% for plants grown in ambient CO 2 ; plant volume increases by 35%-40% for groups grown in elevated CO 2 (Figure 12).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPost-hoc Tukey HSD found significant differences between 0.2% and 0.6% spirulina groups (p<0.01) for all conditions, and between 0.2% and 1.4% groups for both simulant types at high CO2 (p<0.01).
“Significance is also seen between the 0.2% solution and the 0.6% spirulina groups (p < 0.01) for all conditions and between the 0.2% and 1.4% spirulina groups for both types of regolith simulant at high concentrations of CO 2 (p < 0.01).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPlants grown at ambient CO2 showed more yellowing with time, while plants at high CO2 showed more yellowing initially but then became gradually greener.
“In addition, plants grown at ambient levels of CO 2 show more yellowing with time while plants grown at high levels of CO 2 show more yellowing initially but then become gradually greener.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGeneral yellowing as a function of time was noted for all runs, most noticeable for plants grown in lunar simulant compared to Martian.
“A general yellowing as a function of time is noted in the table for all runs, although the yellowing is most noticeable for plants grown in lunar regolith simulant compared to Martian.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt ambient CO2, plants grown in lunar simulant yielded larger wet and dry weights than Martian simulant, with difference significant only for the 0.6% spirulina concentration (t(14)=1.76, p=0.034).
“The plants grown in lunar regolith simulant yield larger weights than their counterparts grown in Martian regolith simulant for both wet and dry weights at ambient levels of CO 2 , although the difference is only significant for the plants which received the 0.6% spirulina concentration (t (14) = 1.76, p = 0.034).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPlants fertilized with 0.2% spirulina grew 1.4 times more leaves, and those with 0.6% resulted in 1.5 times more leaves than controls.
“Plants fertilized with 0.2% spirulina grew 1.4 times more leaves; those fertilized with the 0.6% solution resulted in 1.5 times more leaves than the controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor high CO2 runs, there was a significant difference at the 99th percentile between plants fertilized with 0.2% vs 0.6% spirulina for both lunar (t(7)=1.89, p<0.001) and Martian (t(9)=1.83, p=0.004) simulants.
“For the high CO 2 runs, there is a significant difference at the 99th percentile between plants fertilized with the 0.2% spirulina solution compared to 0.6% for both lunar (t (7) = 1.89, p < 0.001) and Martian (t (9) = 1.83, p = 0.004) regolith simulant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPCA showed plants grown in Martian simulant with 0.6% spirulina had the strongest median growth, while 1.4% spirulina showed diminished performance in both simulant types.
“Plants grown in Martian regolith simulant with 0.6% spirulina exhibit the strongest median growth, while those which received the 1.4% spirulina treatment show diminished performance in both regolith simulant types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt ambient CO2, water-only groups showed a declining vertical growth trend after day 24, while spirulina-treated groups showed stable or slightly increasing trends throughout the growth period.
“The water-only groups show a declining trend after day 24 (slope = -0.051(lunar); -0.10 (Martian)), while the groups treated with the spirulina show either stable (0.2% spirulina solution; slope = 0.047 (lunar); 0.080 (Martian)) or slightly increasing trends (0.6% and 1.2% spirulina solutions; slope = 0.11 (lunar); 0.20 (Martian)) throughout the entire growth period.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor water-only groups, plants grown in Martian simulant at elevated CO2 showed higher growth rates than those in lunar simulant during the plateau period, while both declined.
“For the water-only groups, plants grown in Martian regolith simulant at elevated CO 2 show higher growth rates compared to those in lunar regolith simulant during the plateau period, although plants in both types of regolith simulants show a clear decline during this period (Figure 9).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn 100% regolith simulants, plant growth increased with increasing spirulina concentration, most noticeably under high CO2 and in Martian compared to lunar simulant.
“Plant growth increases with increasing concentration of spirulina solution; this increase is most noticeable for plants grown under conditions of high CO 2 and for plants grown in Martian regolith simulant compared to lunar.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt high CO2, the trend reversed for wet/dry weights between lunar and Martian simulants, but differences were not significant.
“The trend reverses for plants grown at high levels of CO 2 , although the differences between plants grown in lunar and Martian regolith simulant are not significant (see Figure 14).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor water-only and 0.2% spirulina groups, slightly higher growth was maintained under ambient CO2 compared to high CO2; this trend reversed for 0.6% and 1.4% spirulina groups.
“For the water-only groups and those which received the 0.2% concentration of spirulina, slightly higher growth is maintained for the groups grown under ambient CO 2 concentrations compared to high CO 2 ; this trend reverses for the groups which received 0.6% and 1.4% spirulina solutions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe 1.4% spirulina solution supported the highest initial growth rates but plateaued at the level of the 0.6% solution.
“The 1.4% spirulina solution supports the highest growth rates initially, but plateaus at the level of the 0.6% solution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPCA showed growth in lunar simulant with 0.2% spirulina produced extreme outliers, suggesting dose-response variability.
“Growth in lunar regolith simulant with 0.2% spirulina produces extreme outliers, suggesting dose-response variability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe 0.6% and 1.4% spirulina groups differed significantly (p<0.01) for both lunar and Martian simulants in high CO2 runs, but not in ambient CO2 runs.
“The 0.6% and 1.4% spirulina groups differ significantly (p < 0.01) for both lunar and Martian regolith simulant mixtures for the high CO 2 runs, but do not differ significantly for the ambient CO 2 runs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTwo-way ANOVA revealed significant main effects of spirulina dosage and CO2, and a significant interaction effect on growth.
“A two-way ANOVA reveals a significant main effect of spirulina dosage (F (2,36) = 18.02, p < 0.001); a significant main effect of CO 2 (F (1,36) = 9.84, p = 0.003); and a significant interaction effect (F (2,36) = 4.65, p = 0.016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt ambient CO2, the 0.2% spirulina group differed significantly (p<0.05) from the 1.4% group for lunar simulant, but no significant difference was found for Martian simulant.
“At ambient levels of CO 2 , the 0.2% spirulina group differs significantly (p < 0.05) from the 1.4% spirulina group for lunar regolith simulant; no significant difference is found between the 0.2% and 1.4% solutions for the Martian regolith simulant mixtures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenPlants receiving lower concentrations of spirulina tended to be yellower and less healthy.
“Plants which received lower concentrations of spirulina treatment tend to be yellower and less healthy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPlants showed signs of stress over time, including leaf yellowing, faster initial growth rates, light-seeking behaviors, and lack of flowering/seed production.
“but showed signs of stress over time, including leaf yellowing, faster initial growth rates, light-seeking behaviors, and lack of flowering/seed production.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataHarvest wet and dry weights and root measurements also support this trend.
“Harvest wet and dry weights and root measurements also support this trend.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningMeasured leaf color indicated the lunar plants were slightly more stressed compared with the Martian; the plants grown in Martian registered at a healthier level on the color scale.
“As an indication of both plant health and chlorophyll production, the measured leaf color indicated the lunar plants were slightly more stressed compared with the Martian; the plants grown in Martian registered at a healthier level on the color scale.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Leaf color is a valid qualitative measure of photosynthesis and plant health.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationSignificant yellowing occurred for plants grown under the highest CO2 levels, indicative of diminished transpiration.
“Significant yellowing occurred for plants grown under the highest CO 2 levels, indicative of diminished transpiration (Morison and Lawlor, 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Morison and Lawlor, 1999 source
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningSpirulina significantly enhanced plant biomass and height, especially when paired with elevated CO2 levels.
“Spirulina significantly enhanced plant biomass and height, especially when paired with elevated CO 2 levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn each case, plants that received spirulina treatment showed larger growth metrics and healthier leaves than those that only received water, and growth was sustained well beyond the point where nutrition from the seed was exhausted.
“In each case, the plants that received the spirulina treatment showed larger growth metrics and healthier leaves than those that only received water, and growth was sustained well beyond the point where nutrition from the seed was exhausted.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWater-only control plants struggled but did grow, reaching the lowest plant heights and leaf counts, and showed the most yellowing and the fewest seeds produced.
“These plants struggled, but did grow, reaching the lowest plant heights and leaf counts.”
- Also stated in: § 4.1 Efficacy of spirulina treatment · plain
“They showed the most yellowing and the fewest seeds produced.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 4.1 Efficacy of spirulina treatment · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenWater-only groups declined after the initial growth phase; spirulina fertilized groups maintained steady growth rates over the full growing period.
“Water-only groups declined after the initial growth phase; spirulina fertilized groups maintained steady growth rates over the full growing period.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRoot systems showed substantial growth and were generally healthy.
“Root systems showed substantial growth and were generally healthy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPlants grown in 100% regolith simulant with consistent moisture performed well and developed nearly pristine root caps.
“Despite this, plants grown in 100% regolith simulant with consistent moisture maintained performed well and developed nearly pristine root caps.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSeed formation was rare but present, with three pods produced in the water-only, high-CO2 tent, and several seeds observed in high-CO2 spirulina groups during the July/August run.
“Seed formation was rare, but present, with three pods produced in the water-only, high-CO 2 tent, and several seeds observed in high-CO 2 spirulina groups during the July/August run.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGrowth in lunar regolith simulant was generally comparable to growth in Martian regolith simulant, but plant health metrics were better for plants grown in Martian regolith simulant in high CO2 environments.
“Overall, growth in lunar regolith simulant was generally comparable to growth in Martian regolith simulant, but plant health metrics, as evidenced by leaf count, leaf color, and visual inspection of the plants, were better for plants grown in Martian regolith simulant in high CO 2 environments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPlants that received spirulina treatment experienced more growth and greater plant health than water-only controls.
“In contrast, the plants that received the spirulina treatment experienced more growth and greater plant health.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSpirulina boosts growth for radish microgreens significantly; Martian regolith simulant with 0.6% spirulina under elevated CO2 yielded the best results.
“Spirulina boosts growth for radish microgreens significantly; Martian regolith simulant with 0.6% spirulina under elevated CO 2 yielded the best results.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataApplication of aqueous spirulina solution led to healthier plant growth in both regolith simulants under different levels of environmental CO2 as evidenced by plant height, plant volume, and leaf count and colour, over a full seed-to-flowering cycle, with limited seed formation only in the high-CO2 tents.
“Application of aqueous spirulina solution led to healthier plant growth in both regolith simulants under different levels of environmental CO 2 as evidenced by plant height, plant volume, and leaf count and colour, over a full seed-toflowering cycle, with limited seed formation only in the high-CO 2 tents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll concentrations of spirulina solutions resulted in healthier plants and higher growth rates.
“All concentrations of spirulina solutions resulted in healthier plants and higher growth rates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenStress effects were more pronounced for the water-only groups and for the elevated CO2 groups.
“These effects were more pronounced for the water-only groups and for the elevated CO 2 groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe addition of two small fans alleviated the yellowing issue and allowed the plants to maintain photosynthetic rates as indicated by leaf color.
“The addition of two small fans alleviated the issue and allowed the plants to maintain photosynthetic rates as indicated by leaf color.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRegolith simulant type influenced biomass more than height, with the best growth found in Martian rather than lunar regolith simulant.
“Regolith simulant type influenced biomass more than height, with the best growth found in Martian rather than lunar regolith simulant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe use of lunar and Martian regolith simulants yielded similar height and volume results for the plants, while plants were somewhat healthier when grown in the Martian regolith simulant, but the difference was not large.
“The use of lunar and Martian regolith simulants yielded similar height and volume results for the plants; while plants were somewhat healthier when grown in the Martian regolith simulant, the difference was not large.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUnder elevated CO2 conditions, the mean dry biomass of radish microgreens was 1.02 g in the control group, 1.45 g for the 3 g spirulina group, and 1.73 g for the 7 g spirulina group.
“Under elevated CO 2 conditions, the mean dry biomass of radish microgreens increases from 1.02 g in the control group to 1.45 g for the 3 g spirulina group and peaks at 1.73 g for the 7 g spirulina group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningWhile the spirulina fertilizer supplied sufficient nutrition to sustain plant growth over the growing cycle, it did not fully compensate for the environmental stressors.
“While the spirulina fertilizer supplied sufficient nutrition to sustain plant growth over the growing cycle, it did not fully compensate for the environmental stressors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn ambient CO2 conditions, the mean dry biomass of radish microgreens was 0.94 g in the control group, 1.26 g for the 3 g spirulina group, and 1.45 g for the 7 g spirulina group.
“In ambient CO 2 conditions, the corresponding values are slightly lower: 0.94 g (control), 1.26 g (3 g), and 1.45 g (7 g).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe data for 1.4% spirulina plants grown in lunar simulant at ambient CO2 did not fit the trends shown but represented only 44 days of growth compared with 64 days for other runs.
“The data for the 1.4% spirulina plants grown in lunar regolith simulant at ambient CO 2 does not fit the trends shown but represents only 44 days of growth compared with 64 days for the other runs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataTemperature and humidity were held at approximately 26.7 °C and 75% RH.
“Temperature and humidity were continuously monitored using a Temp Stick IoT sensor (Ideal Sciences, model TS-01), with values held at approximately 26.7 ° C and 75% RH, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductreasoningPlants were grown in mixed substrates rather than pure simulants due to the sphagnum moss liner, and this limitation is acknowledged.
“While it improved hydration, it means plants were grown in mixed substrates rather than pure simulants.This limitation is acknowledged.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe accuracy with which manufactured simulants mimic actual lunar and Martian regolith has been called into question.
“The accuracy with which manufactured simulants mimic actual lunar and Martian regolith has been called into question (Eichler et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eichler et al., 2021 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThese results align with plant growth studies on the ISS, where environmental CO2 levels are elevated compared to atmospheric values on Earth.
“These results align with plant growth studies on the ISS (where environmental CO 2 levels are elevated compared to atmospheric values on Earth) described earlier in the paper.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationUnder terrestrial conditions, spirulina fertilization increases productivity including marketable yield and nitrogen fixation.
“Under terrestrial conditions, plants fertilized with spirulina exhibit increased biomass (Singh, 2014), enhanced photosynthetic pigment content, improved growth and yield rates (Shedeed et al., 2022), greater productivity including marketable yield and nitrogen fixation (Geries and Elsadany, 2021), and elevated micronutrient content (Anitha et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Geries and Elsadany, 2021 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe initial high rate of growth reflects sustainment from the seed, while growth during the plateau period represents the plant's ability to thrive based on nutrition absorbed from the soil and fertilization.
“The initial high rate of growth demonstrated reflects sustainment from the seed, while the growth during the plateau period represents the plant's ability to thrive based on nutrition absorbed from the soil and fertilization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe main differences in plant growth metrics are likely due to the water-carrying capacities and compaction of the regolith simulant; water-carrying capacity is higher for the Martian regolith simulant used, while compaction is higher for the lunar regolith simulant used.
“The main differences in plant growth metrics are likely due to the water-carrying capacities and compaction of the regolith simulant; the former is higher for the Martian regolith simulant used in this study, which the latter is higher for the lunar regolith simulant used.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMicrocoleaceae enhance salt tolerance, disease resistance, and polysaccharide production.
“In terrestrial soils, they contribute to soil aggregation and stability (Rashid et al., 2016), increase the water-holding capacity and nutrient content of degraded soils (Singh et al., 2016), and enhance salt tolerance, disease resistance, and polysaccharide production (Singh, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Singh, 2014 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe experimental design followed a full-factorial structure: 2 CO2 concentrations × 3 spirulina treatments × 2 regolith simulant types × 5 soil-to-regolith simulant ratios, plus controls, totaling 72 treatment groups.
“The experimental design followed a full-factorial structure: 2 CO 2 concentrations × 3 spirulina treatments × 2 regolith simulant types × 5 soil-to-regolith simulant ratios, plus controls, totaling 72 treatment groups (10 plants per group).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationFor dicots, leaves emerge earlier and more abundantly, within a similar size range, under high CO2 conditions.
“This is particularly true for dicots, where it has been shown that leaves emerge earlier and more abundantly, within a similar size range, when grown in high CO 2 conditions (Morison and Lawlor, 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Morison and Lawlor, 1999 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe growth chambers were maintained at distinct CO2 concentrations: ambient (400 ppm) and elevated (1,200 ppm), with elevated CO2 controlled within 1,100-1300 ppm.
“The growth chambers used in this study were maintained at distinct CO 2 concentrations: ambient (400 ppm) and elevated (1,200 ppm).A CO 2 control unit (Autopilot APC8200) was integrated to maintain elevated CO 2 levels with precision within a range of 1,100-1300 ppm in the elevated chamber”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductreasoningHigh humidity (95%-100% RH) for 6 days starting day 33 represented an additional stressor and may have influenced plant color and health.
“The high levels of humidity represent an additional stressor for the plants and may have influenced plant color and health.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe study was limited to short-cycle microgreens.
“The study was limited to short-cycle microgreens.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSpirulina supplements deliver nutrients and bioactive compounds through aqueous extraction, making phytohormones, antioxidants, and enzymes available to plants, improving root growth, stress tolerance, and nutrient uptake.
“Furthermore, spirulina supplements deliver nutrients and bioactive compounds through aqueous extraction, making phytohormones, antioxidants, and enzymes available to plants, improving root growth, stress tolerance, and nutrient uptake (Henard et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Henard et al., 2021 source
The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductreasoningA supplementary fan introduced on day 25 to improve air circulation after early yellowing introduces a potential confounding variable for late-stage leaf color and health metrics.
“While intended to stabilize airflow, this change introduces a potential confounding variable for late-stage leaf color and health metrics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThis is a known and unavoidable limitation of the study due to the lack of Martian samples and the limited availability of lunar samples.
“This is a known and unavoidable limitation of the study due to the lack of Martian samples and the limited availability of lunar samples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningCrops with longer lifecycles may exhibit different responses.
“Crops with longer lifecycles may exhibit different responses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe use of sphagnum moss as a liner for the plant pods is a potential confound.
“The use of sphagnum moss as a liner for the plant pods is another potential confound.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationElevated CO2 increases photosynthetic activity and biomass accumulation by boosting the Calvin cycle's efficiency and reducing photorespiration.
“Elevated CO 2 increases photosynthetic activity and biomass accumulation by boosting the Calvin cycle's efficiency and reducing photorespiration (Zabel et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zabel et al., 2022 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenWhile CO2 was controlled, other atmospheric variables (e.g., ethylene accumulation) were not.
“While CO 2 was controlled, other atmospheric variables (e.g., ethylene accumulation) were not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningBoth interventions (fan and dehumidifier) were applied only to the high-CO2 chamber, not to the ambient CO2 chamber.
“Both interventions (fan and dehumidifier) were applied only to the high-CO 2 chamber, not to the ambient CO 2 chamber.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenEarly flowering and limited seed production reflect a typical stress response in plants, where they occur as a survival mechanism under severe stress.
“This reflects a typical stress response in plants, where early flowering and limited seed production occur as a survival mechanism under severe stress.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Early flowering and limited seed production are a typical stress response in plants under severe stress.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAbove a certain threshold, high amounts of CO2 are toxic to plants, impacting growth and health.
“Above a certain threshold, high amounts of CO 2 are toxic to plants, impacting both plant growth and overall health (CO 2 meter, 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites CO 2 meter, 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThese results indicate that while vegetative growth was improved with spirulina supplementation, reproductive capacity remained constrained, consistent with challenges reported in space crop trials.
“These results indicate that while vegetative growth was improved with spirulina supplementation, reproductive capacity remained constrained, consistent with challenges reported in space crop trials.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPlants grown under elevated CO2 often exhibit increased root length and diameter, but are also associated with altered branching patterns in shoots and roots.
“Plants grown under elevated CO 2 concentrations often exhibit increased root length and diameter; however, they are also associated with altered branching patterns in both shoots and roots which may impair the plant's ability to compete for resources both below and above ground (Pritchard et al., 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pritchard et al., 1999 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe growth chamber was sealed to prevent light leaks and minimize gas exchange, with leakage measured at less than 5% of chamber volume per 24 h.
“The tent's construction is sealed to prevent light leaks and minimize gas exchange with the surrounding atmosphere, with leakage measured at <5% of chamber volume per 24 h.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningConsistent use of sphagnum moss in all plant groups allows for the establishment of a baseline against which the relative effects of each variable may be compared.
“Importantly the consistent use of sphagnum moss in all plant groups allows for the establishment of a baseline against which the relative effects of each variable may be compared.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenTrays were randomized within chambers and rotated frequently to mitigate position effects.
“Trays were randomized within chambers and rotated frequently to mitigate position effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenThis sample size provides sufficient statistical power consistent with standards in plant biology.
“This sample size provides sufficient statistical power consistent with standards in plant biology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
Baseline nutrient content of the soil and regolith simulants matches manufacturer specifications.
“Baseline nutrient content of the soil and regolith simulants was assumed based on manufacturer specifications; however, chemical profiling was not independently verified and may contribute to growth differences.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Manufactured regolith simulants are adequate proxies for actual lunar and Martian regolith for assessing plant growth in space agriculture.
“This study utilized regolith simulant from Space Resources Technologies (532 S Econ Circle.Oviedo, Florida 32765, US; https://spaceresourcetech.com/).”
“The accuracy with which manufactured simulants mimic actual lunar and Martian regolith has been called into question (Eichler et al., 2021).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Leaf color is a valid qualitative measure of photosynthesis and plant health.
“Leaf color, a qualitative measure of photosynthesis, showed a strong variation with the amount of fertilization,”
The paper relies on this without support.
Early flowering and limited seed production are a typical stress response in plants under severe stress.
“This reflects a typical stress response in plants, where early flowering and limited seed production occur as a survival mechanism under severe stress.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Water-only growing conditions are non-nutritive.
“The water-only control plants showed significant signs of distress due to the non-nutritive growing conditions.”
Statistics that don’t add up
Each reported p-value recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom.
Inconsistent p-value across alpha = .05: t (7) = 1.89, p < .001
MajorThe paper reports p < .001 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p = .101 (two-tailed). The two fall on opposite sides of alpha = .05. The check cannot tell whether the statistic or the p-value is the misprint.
Reported p < .001 · recomputed p = .101
“t (7) = 1.89, p < 0.001”
Inconsistent p-value across alpha = .05: t (9) = 1.83, p = .004
MajorThe paper reports p = .004 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p = .100 (two-tailed). The two fall on opposite sides of alpha = .05. The check cannot tell whether the statistic or the p-value is the misprint.
Reported p = .004 · recomputed p = .100
“t (9) = 1.83, p = 0.004”
Inconsistent p-value across alpha = .05: t (14) = 1.76, p = .034
MajorThe paper reports p = .034 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p = .100 (two-tailed). The two fall on opposite sides of alpha = .05. The check cannot tell whether the statistic or the p-value is the misprint.
Reported p = .034 · recomputed p = .100
“t (14) = 1.76, p = 0.034”
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Doesn’t add upt(14) = 1.76reported p = .034 · recomputed p = .100The two fall on opposite sides of .05
“t (14) = 1.76, p = .034”
- Doesn’t add upt(7) = 1.89reported p < .001 · recomputed p = .101The two fall on opposite sides of .05
“t (7) = 1.89, p < .001”
- Doesn’t add upt(9) = 1.83reported p = .004 · recomputed p = .100The two fall on opposite sides of .05
“t (9) = 1.83, p = .004”
- Consistentt(6) = 11.22reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t (6) = 11.22,p < .001”
- Consistentt(7) = 25.67reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t (7) = 25.67,p < .001”
- Consistentt(8) = 19.24reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t (8) = 19.24,p < .001”
- Consistentt(7) = 31.77reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t (7) = 31.77,p < .001”
- Consistentt(8) = 21.46reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t (8) = 21.46,p < .001”
- Consistentt(7) = 23.98reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t (7) = 23.98,p < .001”
- Consistentt(4) = 12.43reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t (4) = 12.43, p < .001”
- Consistentt(6) = 20.91reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t (6) = 20.91,p < .001”
- Consistentt(4) = 13.84reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t (4) = 13.84,p < .001”
- Consistentt(6) = 17.08reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t (6) = 17.08, p < .001”
- Consistentt(5) = 27.42reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t (5) = 27.42,p < .001”
- Consistentt(8) = 23.41reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t (8) = 23.41,p < .001”
- Consistentt(46) = 6.76reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t (46) = 6.76, p < .001”
- Consistentt(36) = 4.96reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t (36) = 4.96, p < .001”
- Consistentt(46) = 10.05reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t (46) = 10.05,p < .001”
- Consistentt(47) = 9.03reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t (47) = 9.03, p < .001”
- ConsistentF(2, 24) = 12.31reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“F (2,24) = 12.31, p < .001”
- ConsistentF(2, 36) = 18.02reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“F (2,36) = 18.02, p < .001”
- ConsistentF(1, 36) = 9.84reported p = .003 · recomputed p = .003
“F (1,36) = 9.84, p = .003”
- ConsistentF(2, 36) = 4.65reported p = .016 · recomputed p = .016
“F (2,36) = 4.65, p = .016”
- ConsistentF(3, 16) = 119.5reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“F (3,16) = 119.5,p < .001”
- ConsistentF(3, 16) = 95.68reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“F (3,16) = 95.68,p < .001”
- ConsistentF(3, 16) = 210.4reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“F (3,16) = 210.4,p < .001”
- ConsistentF(3, 16) = 346.5reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“F (3,16) = 346.5,p < .001”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
CO2 effect described as both nonsignificant and significant
MajorThe results state that growth did not differ significantly between ambient and high CO2, but the reported two-way ANOVA identifies a significant main effect of CO2 on plant growth.
“No significant difference is noted between growth under ambient vs. high CO 2 for both regolith simulants”
“a significant main effect of CO 2 (F (1,36) = 9.84, p = 0.003)”
Positive growth claimed for every regolith group despite declining controls
MinorThe claim that each regolith-grown group maintained a positive growth rate for the remainder of the experiment includes water-only groups, which are elsewhere reported to decline.
“Each group of plants grown in regolith simulant shows an initial high rate of growth, which plateaus around 15-20 days after planting and afterwards maintains a small but positive growth rate for the remainder of the experiment.”
“The water-only groups show a declining trend after day 24 (slope = -0.051(lunar); -0.10 (Martian))”
Added fan is said to increase airflow to below its previously reported level
MinorThe methods give canopy airflow as approximately 0.25-0.35 m/s, then say a supplementary fan increased canopy airflow to approximately 0.15 m/s.
“The duct fan provided ~180-200 CFM, corresponding to ~0.25-0.35m/s at canopy level.A supplementary mini fan introduced on day 25 increased canopy airflow to ~0.15 m/s.”
“The supplementary fan increased local canopy airflow from ~0.05 m/s to ~0.15 m/s”
Results refer to an unlisted 1.2% spirulina treatment
MinorThe reported growth trend names a 1.2% solution, whereas the methods list 1.4% as the highest concentration tested.
“0.6% and 1.2% spirulina solutions; slope = 0.11 (lunar); 0.20 (Martian)”
“an aqueous solution of spirulina at concentrations of 0.2%, 0.6%, and 1.4% (by mass)”
Cites
Increasing CO2 threatens human nutrition
Myers, S. S., Zanobetti, A., Kloog, I., Huybers, P., Leakey, A. D. B., Bloom, A. J., Carlisle, E., Dietterich, L. H., Fitzgerald, G., Hasegawa, T., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13179 · Cited by 1,470 · see citing works
Detection of perchlorate and the soluble chemistry of martian soil at the phoenix lander site
Hecht, M. H., Kounaves, S. P., Quinn, R. C., West, S. J., Young, S. M. M., Ming, D. W., Catling, D. C., Clark, B. C., Boynton, W. V., Hoffman, J., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172466 · Cited by 1,166 · see citing works
Rashid, M. I., Mujawar, L. H., Shahzad, T., Almeelbi, T., Ismail, I. M. I., & Oves, M. (2016) · Microbiological Research · doi:10.1016/j.micres.2015.11.007 · Cited by 894 · see citing works
Cyanobacteria: a precious bio-resource in agriculture, ecosystem, and environmental sustainability
Singh, J. S., Kumar, A., Rai, A. N., & Singh, D. P. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00529 · Cited by 758 · see citing works
Interactions between increasing CO<sub>2</sub> concentration and temperature on plant growth
MORISON, J. I. L., & LAWLOR, D. W. (1999) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00443.x · Cited by 509 · see citing works
Elevated CO<sub>2</sub>and plant structure: a review
Pritchard, S. G., Rogers, H. H., Prior, S. A., & Peterson, C. M. (1999) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.1999.00268.x · Cited by 462 · see citing works
Rising atmospheric CO2 and human nutrition: toward globally imbalanced plant stoichiometry?
Loladze, I. (2002) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(02)02587-9 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
Reanalysis of the Viking results suggests perchlorate and organics at midlatitudes on Mars
Navarro‐González, R., Vargas, E., de la Rosa, J., Raga, A. C., & McKay, C. P. (2010) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/2010je003599 · Cited by 384 · see citing works
Review and analysis of over 40 years of space plant growth systems
Zabel, P., Bamsey, M., Schubert, D., & Tajmar, M. (2016) · Life Sciences in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.lssr.2016.06.004 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Can Plants Grow on Mars and the Moon: A Growth Experiment on Mars and Moon Soil Simulants
Wamelink, G. W. W., Frissel, J. Y., Krijnen, W. H. J., Verwoert, M. R., & Goedhart, P. W. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103138 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Singh, S. (2014) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/jam.12612 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Microbiological and Nutritional Analysis of Lettuce Crops Grown on the International Space Station
Khodadad, C. L. M., Hummerick, M. E., Spencer, L. E., Dixit, A. R., Richards, J. T., Romeyn, M. W., Smith, T. M., Wheeler, R. M., & Massa, G. D. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00199 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Godlewska, K., Michalak, I., Pacyga, P., Baśladyńska, S., & Chojnacka, K. (2019) · World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s11274-019-2653-6 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Prior, S. A., Runion, G. B., Marble, S. C., Rogers, H. H., Gilliam, C. H., & Torbert, H. A. (2011) · HortScience · doi:10.21273/hortsci.46.2.158 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Plant growth promoting cyanobacteria and their distribution in terrestrial habitats of Iran
Shariatmadari, Z., Riahi, H., Seyed Hashtroudi, M., Ghassempour, A., & Aghashariatmadary, Z. (2013) · Soil Science and Plant Nutrition · doi:10.1080/00380768.2013.782253 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Long-Term Space Nutrition: A Scoping Review
Tang, H., Rising, H. H., Majji, M., & Brown, R. D. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu14010194 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Duri, L. G., Caporale, A. G., Rouphael, Y., Vingiani, S., Palladino, M., De Pascale, S., & Adamo, P. (2022) · Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences · doi:10.3389/fspas.2021.747821 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Paul, A.-L., Elardo, S. M., & Ferl, R. (2022) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-022-03334-8 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Wide range applications of spirulina: from earth to space missions
Fais, G., Manca, A., Bolognesi, F., Borselli, M., Concas, A., Busutti, M., Broggi, G., Sanna, P., Castillo-Aleman, Y. M., Rivero-Jiménez, R. A., et al. (2022) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md20050299 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Growth and Photosynthetic Responses of Wheat Plants Grown in Space
Tripathy, B. C., Brown, C. S., Levine, H. G., & Krikorian, A. D. (1996) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.110.3.801 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Growth chambers on the International Space Station for large plants
Massa, G. D., Wheeler, R. M., Morrow, R. C., & Levine, H. G. (2016) · Acta Horticulturae · doi:10.17660/actahortic.2016.1134.29 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Challenging the agricultural viability of martian regolith simulants
Eichler, A., Hadland, N., Pickett, D., Masaitis, D., Handy, D., Perez, A., Batcheldor, D., Wheeler, B., & Palmer, A. (2021) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2020.114022 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Plant growth-promoting abilities in Cyanobacteria
Rai, A. N., Singh, A. K., & Syiem, M. B. (2019) · Cyanobacteria · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-814667-5.00023-4 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Biology and crop production in Space environments: Challenges and opportunities
Pascale, S. D., Arena, C., Aronne, G., Micco, V. D., Pannico, A., Paradiso, R., & Rouphael, Y. (2021) · Life Sciences in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.lssr.2021.02.005 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Long-Fox, J. M., & Britt, D. T. (2023) · Frontiers in Space Technologies · doi:10.3389/frspt.2023.1255535 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Geries, L. S. M., & Elsadany, A. Y. (2021) · Archives of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s00203-020-01991-z · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Supplemental Food Production With Plants: A Review of NASA Research
Johnson, C. M., Boles, H. O., Spencer, L. E., Poulet, L., Romeyn, M. W., Bunchek, J. M., Fritsche, R. F., Massa, G. D., O’Rourke, A. E., & Wheeler, R. M. (2021) · Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences · doi:10.3389/fspas.2021.734343 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Monje, O., Stutte, G. W., & Chapman, D. (2005) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-005-1529-1 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Shedeed, Z. A., Gheda, S., Elsanadily, S., Alharbi, K., & Osman, M. E. H. (2022) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture12060781 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Carotenoid composition of locally found seaweeds of Dakshina Kannada district in India
Bhat, I., Haripriya, G., Jogi, N., & Mamatha, B. S. (2021) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2020.102154 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Spaceflight hardware for conducting plant growth experiments in space: The early years 1960–2000
Porterfield, D. M., Neichitailo, G. S., Mashinsky, A. L., & Musgrave, M. E. (2003) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/s0273-1177(02)00752-4 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Growing fresh food on future space missions: Environmental conditions and crop management
Meinen, E., Dueck, T., Kempkes, F. L. K., & Stanghellini, C. (2018) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2018.03.002 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Plant biology for space exploration – Building on the past, preparing for the future
Kordyum, E. L., & Hasenstein, K. H. (2021) · Life Sciences in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.lssr.2021.01.003 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Large-Scale Crop Production for the Moon and Mars: Current Gaps and Future Perspectives
Poulet, L., Engeling, K. W., Hatch, T., Stahl-Rommel, S., Justiniano, Y.-A. V., Castro-Wallace, S. L., Bunchek, J. M., Monje, O., Hummerick, M. E., Khodadad, C. L. M., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences · doi:10.3389/fspas.2021.733944 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Phenotypic plasticity as a clue for invasion success of the submerged aquatic plant Elodea nuttallii
Szabó, S. R., Peeters, E. T. H. M., Várbíró, G., Borics, G., & Lukács, B. (2018) · Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/plb.12918 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Georgescu, M.-R., Meslem, A., & Năstase, I. (2020) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107278 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Overview and recommendations for research on plants and microbes in regolith-based agriculture
Fackrell, L. E., Humphrey, S., Loureiro, R. R., Palmer, A. G., & Long-Fox, J. M. (2024) · npj Sustainable Agriculture · doi:10.1038/s44264-024-00013-5 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Anitha, L., Sai Bramari, G., & Kalpana, P. (2016) · Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology · doi:10.4236/abb.2016.76027 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Cognitive performance during prolonged periods in isolated, confined, and extreme environments
Connaboy, C., Sinnott, A. M., LaGoy, A. D., Krajewski, K. T., Johnson, C. D., Pepping, G., Simpson, R. J., Bower, J. L., & Alfano, C. A. (2020) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.08.018 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Chinnannan, K., Somagattu, P., Yammanuru, H., Nimmakayala, P., Chakrabarti, M., & Reddy, U. K. (2023) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants13010055 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Jones (2016) · doi:10.1016/j.lssr.2016.06.003 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Telomere dynamics and oxidative stress in Arabidopsis grown in lunar regolith simulant
Barcenilla, B. B., Kundel, I., Hall, E., Hilty, N., Ulianich, P., Cook, J., Turley, J., Yerram, M., Min, J.-H., Castillo-González, C., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1351613 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Taha, M. A., Moussa, H. R., & Dessoky, E. S. (2023) · Egyptian Journal of Botany · doi:10.21608/ejbo.2023.168006.2165 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Assessing Radish Health during Space Cultivation by Gene Transcription
Hasenstein, K. H., John, S. P., & Vandenbrink, J. P. (2023) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants12193458 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Boyer, K., Li, L., Li, T., Zhang, B., & Zhao, G. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0294724 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Akgul, 2019, Proceedings: 3rd international Conference on Food and Agricultural Economics: the effect of Spirulina Platensis (Gomont) Geitler extracts on seed germination of Lactuca Sativa L
- Bhowmik, 2010, Evaluating potential of Spirulina as innoculant for pulses, Acad. J. Plant Sci., 3, 161
- González, 2023, Chemical, microstructural and mineralogical characterization of Sphagnum moss vs. peat in Tierra del Fuego, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 173, 105800, 10.1016/j.jaap.2023.105800 · DOI
- Manalu, 2025, Phytochemical screening and antimicrobial potential of Sphagnum spp. from North Sumatra highlands, Indonesian J. Bot., 20, 95, 10.15408/ijb.v20i2.34567 · DOI
- 2021, Planetary fact sheet
- Pérez, 2022, Sphagnan polysaccharides: structure, function and ecological role in Sphagnum mosses, Plant Biochem. Rep., 11, 87, 10.1016/j.pbr.2022.05.001 · DOI
- Zabel, 2022, Controlled environment agriculture in space: Lesson from EDEN ISS, Acta Hortic., 1369, 1, 10.17660/actahortic.2022.1369 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Selection of beneficial fungi for plants with the potential to metabolize lunar and Martian regolith
Oliveira, J. C., Loureiro, R. R., Palmer, A., & Patreze, C. M. (2026) · Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences · doi:10.3389/fspas.2026.1784533 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Renaud, C., Delacuvellerie, A., Karasiewicz, T., Villa-Massone, J., Lewillion, E., Loureiro, R. R., & Wattiez, R. (2026) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-026-08552-1
Nguyen, T. T. K., Dang, T. T. K., Do, G. D., Tran, T. T., Ho, C. N. Q., To, Q. M., Nguyen, M. T. P., Le, C. P. M., Do, A. P. N., Dinh, L. T. A., et al. (2026) · Current Issues in Molecular Biology · doi:10.3390/cimb48101061
Addesso, R., Caporale, A. G., Adamo, P., Labella, R., Bochicchio, R., Rossi, R., & Amato, M. (2026) · Frontiers in Soil Science · doi:10.3389/fsoil.2026.1999715
- Authors
- Miller, K. A., Trevino, D. T., & Cauthorn, G.
- Affiliations
- American Public University System (US)
- University of North Dakota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Miller, Kristen A.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Space Technologies
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2025-11-03
- Volume
- 6
- ISSN
- 2673-5075 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4415781893
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4
- FWCI
- 2.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Space Technologies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- West Virginia Space Grant Consortium
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Plant Growth and Agriculture Techniques
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
- Keywords
- Spirulina, Spirulina platensis, biofertilizers, regolith simulants, Martian regolith, lunar regolith, elevated CO2, radish, in-situ resource utilization, space agriculture, plant growth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-03.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-03.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review