The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 10 of the 109 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles
Open accessAbstract
Antimitotics are important anticancer agents and include the natural alkaloid prodrug colchicine (COL). However, a major challenge of using COL as an anticancer drug is its cytotoxicity. We developed a novel drug delivery system (DDS) for COL using mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs). The MSNs were functionalized with phosphonate groups, loaded with COL, and coated with folic acid chitosan-glycine complex. The resulting nanoformulation, called MSNsPCOL/CG-FA, was tested for action against cancer and normal cell lines. The anticancer effect was highly enhanced for MSNsPCOL/CG-FA compared to COL. In the case of HCT116 cells, 100% inhibition was achieved. The efficiency of MSNsPCOL/CG-FA ranked in this order: HCT116 (colon cancer) > HepG2 (liver cancer) > PC3 (prostate cancer). MSNsPCOL/CG-FA exhibited low cytotoxicity (4%) compared to COL (~60%) in BJ1 normal cells. The mechanism of action was studied in detail for HCT116 cells and found to be primarily intrinsic apoptosis caused by an enhanced antimitotic effect. Furthermore, a contribution of genetic regulation (metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT 1), and microRNA (mir-205)) and immunotherapy effects (angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2 protein) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) was found. Therefore, this study shows enhanced anticancer effects and reduced cytotoxicity of COL with targeted delivery compared to free COL and is a novel method of developing cancer immunotherapy using a low-cost small-molecule natural prodrug.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper reports a mesoporous silica nanoparticle delivery system for colchicine, MSNsPCOL/CG-FA, functionalized with phosphonate groups and coated with a folic acid–chitosan–glycine complex, which enhanced anticancer effects and reduced normal-cell toxicity compared with free colchicine. In HCT116 colon cancer cells it achieved 100% inhibition at 200 μg/mL and acted mainly through intrinsic apoptosis, with additional effects on genetic and immune markers.
Key findings
- MSNsPCOL/CG-FA inhibited cancer cells in the order HCT116 > HepG2 > PC3. In HCT116 cells, 200 μg/mL produced 100% inhibition at 24, 48, and 72 h; IC50 values for MSNsPCOL/CG-FA were 19.7 μg/mL at 24 h, 17.4 μg/mL at 48 h, and 17.0 μg/mL at 72 h. In normal BJ1 cells, MSNsPCOL/CG-FA inhibited only 4% after 72 h versus ~60% for free COL.
- Mechanistically, MSNsPCOL/CG-FA inhibited tubulin by ~90% at 50 μg/mL, increased G2/M arrest to 14.8% versus 12.4% for 5-FU and 8.7% for COL, induced total apoptosis of 15.0% versus 10.6% for COL, and produced caspase-3 activity >1000 pg/mL. It enhanced Bax to ~14 FLD and inhibited Bcl-2 to ~0.1 FLD, inhibited BRAF by ~90% at 50 μg/mL, and reduced CD44 to 33.3 ± 3.5 ng/mL versus 185.5 ± 15.4 ng/mL in control cells.
- The nanoformulation also reduced MALAT-1 to 0.3 ± 0.05-fold change versus ~160-fold in control cells, reduced mir-205 to 0.53 ± 0.05-fold change versus 14-fold in control cells, lowered Ang-2 to 174.0 ± 0.75 ng/mL versus 213.3 ± 3.0 ng/mL in control cells, and lowered PD-1 to 9.8 ± 0.3 ng/mL versus 14 ± 0.5 ng/mL in control cells, close to the normal BJ1 level of 9.6 ± 0.5 ng/mL.
Methods
- MSNs of KCC-1 type were synthesized, functionalized with phosphonate groups, loaded with colchicine, and coated with chitosan-glycine conjugated to folic acid. Characterization included FE-SEM, STEM, BET surface area, EDS, NTA, FTIR, STA-DSC, XRD, and zeta potential measurements.
- In vitro assays used HCT116 colon cancer, HepG2 liver cancer, PC3 prostate cancer, and BJ1 normal fibroblast cells. Cytotoxicity was measured by MTT assay at 24, 48, and 72 h; mechanism studies used flow cytometry for cell cycle, apoptosis, and mitochondrial membrane potential, ELISA for tubulin, caspase-3, BRAF, cytochrome c, CD44, Ang-2, and PD-1, and RT-PCR for Bax/Bcl-2, MALAT1, and miR-205.
- Data are expressed as mean ± SD, with significance tested by Student t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and ANOVA at p < 0.05; measurements were performed in triplicate.
Limitations
- The paper has no formal limitations section. The authors state that the MALAT1, mir-205, and PD-1 results with COL and its delivery in HCT116 cells were obtained for the first time and that further deep investigations are needed.
- Evident from the text: all anticancer and mechanistic data are in vitro cell-line experiments; no in vivo animal tumor model, pharmacokinetic, biodistribution, or clinical data are reported.
- Evident from the text: the immunotherapy/immune-checkpoint interpretation is based on marker levels in HCT116 cells rather than immune-cell functional assays, and long-term safety or targeting specificity is not established.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures












Verification
Claims the paper makes
109 Own result · 40 Not checked yet · 40 Own interpretation · 15 No basis given · 14 No full text of the sources · 5 Own method · 4 Partly supported · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, a contribution of genetic regulation (metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT 1), and microRNA (mir-205)) and immunotherapy effects (angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2 protein) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) was found.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With further loading of COL on MSNsP, the C content increased and P content decreased in MSNsPCOL as a result of COL loading because it is an organic compound.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.4. Elemental Content Analysis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In TEM images (Figure 2B), there were no detectable differences between MSNs, MSNsP, and MSNsPCOL.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.2. Electron Microscopy of Materials
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Via modification with phosphonates, COL loading, and coating with CG-FA, both surface area and total pore volume were decreased compared to MSNs (380.1 m2/g and 0.772 cm3/g of specific surface area and total pore volume, respectively).”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.3. Surface Area Characteristics
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, in MSNsPCOL/CG-FA, the central part appeared gray-white in color due to the coating complex (chitosan-glycine).”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.2. Electron Microscopy of Materials
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No aggregation was seen.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.2. Electron Microscopy of Materials
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further polymer coating of MSNsPCOL relatively increased the C amount to 9.92 wt% and N amount to 2.77 wt% in MSNsPCOL/CG-FA.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.4. Elemental Content Analysis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The degradation of COL was confirmed with the peak in the range of 340 to 525 °C in MSNsPCOL based on the two maximum peaks at 342 °C and 550 °C for free COL.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.7. Simultaneous Thermal Analysis (STA-DSC) and XRD Characterization
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Figure 4D illustrates that no peaks appeared in the MSNsPCOL pattern corresponding to COL.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.7. Simultaneous Thermal Analysis (STA-DSC) and XRD Characterization
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“MSNs lost ~3.32 wt% because of moisture content.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.7. Simultaneous Thermal Analysis (STA-DSC) and XRD Characterization
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 46
- It may state two separate claims as one. 59
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Micro-RNAs are small non-coding RNAs discovered in 1993 that play crucial roles in cancer, including in cell viability, proliferation, invasion, metastasis, tumor suppressors, and oncogenes [83,84], allowing them to be used in cancer diagnosis and treatment [85,86].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.21. Attenuation of mir-205 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [83] Slack, 2006, Oncomirs—MicroRNAs with a role in cancer, Nat. Rev. Cancer source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [84] Lee, 1993, The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14, Cell source
- Partly supportedcites [85] Schetter, 2012, The role of microRNAs in colorectal cancer, Cancer J. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
- Partly supportedcites [86] Cekaite, 2016, MicroRNAs as growth regulators, their function and biomarker status in colorectal cancer, Oncotarget sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Further post-antimitotic response can arrest the cell cycle at the G2/M phase [51] and cause apoptotic cell death [52].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.11. Inhibition of Tubulin Activity in HCT116 Cancer Cells
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [51] Blajeski, 2002, G(1) and G(2) cell-cycle arrest following microtubule depolymerization in human breast cancer cells, J. Clin. Investig. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion reports G2 arrest after treatment with microtubule-disrupting agents, supporting the arrest portion attributed to this source. But it explicitly describes that arrest as premitotic—before some cells ever reach mitosis—not as a post-antimitotic response. The apoptosis clause has a separate citation and is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Supportedcites [52] Kulshrestha, 2017, Microtubule inhibitor, SP-6-27 inhibits angiogenesis and induces apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells, Oncotarget source
The Results section reports G2/M arrest after treatment with the microtubule inhibitor SP-6-27 in ovarian cancer cells. The Discussion reports that SP-6-27 also induced apoptotic cell death, supporting the cited sentence’s qualified claim that an antimitotic response can produce both outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.89)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Among others, MALAT1 increases tumor formation in many cancers, including gastric, gallbladder, and lung cancer in vivo [77,78,79,80].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.20. Inhibition of MALAT-1 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [77] Zhao, 2018, MALAT1: A long non-coding RNA highly associated with human cancers, Oncol. Lett. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The 'Association of MALAT1 with cancers' section reports that high MALAT1 expression promotes gastric-cancer development and describes its role in non-small-cell lung cancer progression. The 'Signaling pathways involving MALAT1' section describes it as oncogenic in gallbladder carcinoma. These passages support a cancer-promoting role, but do not establish increased tumor formation in vivo in the three named cancers. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Partly supportedcites [78] Okugawa, 2014, Metastasis-associated long non-coding RNA drives gastric cancer development and promotes peritoneal metastasis, Carcinogenesis sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The gastric-cancer expression results and Discussion (page unavailable) report elevated MALAT1 in gastric tumors and an association with peritoneal metastasis. They do not show that MALAT1 increases tumor formation in vivo: the paper's in-vivo tumor-growth experiments tested HOTAIR, not MALAT1. The copy also does not establish in-vivo tumor formation by MALAT1 in gallbladder or lung cancer. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Supportedcites [79] Wu, 2014, MALAT1 promotes the proliferation and metastasis of gallbladder cancer cells by activating the ERK/MAPK pathway, Cancer Biol. Ther. source
This paper supports the gallbladder-cancer part of the multi-cited sentence. In “Effects of MALAT1 knockdown on SGC-996 and NOZ cell proliferation,” it reports significantly inhibited tumor growth in mice given MALAT1-depleted gallbladder cancer cells compared with controls. No page number is provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.92)
- Supportedcites [80] Gutschner, 2013, The noncoding RNA MALAT1 is a critical regulator of the metastasis phenotype of lung cancer cells, Cancer Res. source
The Results section reports that MALAT1 was required for effective lung tumor-nodule formation in mice: A549 cells lacking MALAT1 formed significantly fewer nodules than wild-type cells. In this multiply cited sentence, this paper supports the lung-cancer in vivo example. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The expression levels of the studied lncRNAs were evaluated using GAPDH, which is widely used as an internal control for serum lncRNAs in numerous studies [98,99] according to the manufacturer’s protocol.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 3. Materials and Methods > 3.2. Methods
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [98] Shaker, 2017, Association of rs6983267 at 8q24, HULC rs7763881 polymorphisms and serum lncRNAs CCAT2 and HULC with colorectal cancer in Egyptian patients, Sci. Rep. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Materials and Methods section (Serum lncRNAs assay; page not provided) says this study used GAPDH as an internal control for serum lncRNAs. It does not say that GAPDH is widely used for that purpose in numerous studies. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Partly supportedcites [99] Duan, 2016, Identification of a serum circulating lncRNA panel for the diagnosis and recurrence prediction of bladder cancer, Oncotarget sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The RNA extraction and qRT-PCR section says the authors normalized serum and tissue lncRNA expression using GAPDH as the reference. This supports GAPDH’s use as an internal control in this study, but the cited paper does not establish that it is widely used for serum lncRNAs in numerous studies. (LLM, conf=0.82)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The FE-SEM images (Figure 2A) show the 3D dendritic mesoporous structure of MSNs with a spherical shape that is uniform in size.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.2. Electron Microscopy of Materials
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For MSNsPCOL, the size slightly decreased to 391 ± 3.9 nm but was an insignificant difference.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.5. Particle Size Measurement
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results of the DTG thermograms in Figure 4B are consistent with STA, providing clear data that confirm the degradation.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.7. Simultaneous Thermal Analysis (STA-DSC) and XRD Characterization
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Two new peaks at 1639 cm−1, and an intensive peak centered at 3355 cm−1 were presented in MSNsPCOL, corresponding to shifted peaks at 1542 and 3629 cm−1 for COL.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.6. Functional Group Determination
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In MSNsP, a peak at 63 °C showed moisture, and another at 500 °C was attributed to organic decomposition.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.7. Simultaneous Thermal Analysis (STA-DSC) and XRD Characterization
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Additional modification with organic phosphonate groups changed the elemental content, resulting in the presence of new elements, including 0.24 wt% P, 7.40 wt% C, and 0.95 wt% Na, as seen for MSNsP, confirming the modification.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.4. Elemental Content Analysis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Additional coating resulted in several new peaks, with bands at 698 and 946 cm−1 attributed to chitosan, glycine, or folic acid.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.6. Functional Group Determination
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As their surface was functionalized with phosphonate groups in MSNsP, we observed a new band at 953 cm−1 and a broad peak from 3000 to 3600 cm−1, reflecting phosphonate groups [39].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.6. Functional Group Determination
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [39] Menon, 2016, Cytotoxic Effects of Phosphonate-Functionalized Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The highest weight loss was recorded for MSNsPCOL/CG-FA, which was the result of decomposition of the coating complex (calculated to be 33.4 wt%), which confirms successful fabrication of the coating.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.7. Simultaneous Thermal Analysis (STA-DSC) and XRD Characterization
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As expected, MSNsP had negative zeta values compared to MSNs associated with phosphonate groups.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.8. Zeta Potential Measurements
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Higher cytotoxicity was recorded for HCT116 cells than PC3 and HepG2 cells, with 1000 µg/mL MSN and MSNsP treatment of HCT116 cells resulting in 85.9 ± 6.0% and 77.4 ± 4.7% inhibition, respectively.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.9. MSN Cytotoxicity Evaluation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“MSNs had a very low positive value (<+2 mV) in acidic media and very negative in alkaline medium (−55 mV).”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.8. Zeta Potential Measurements
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“MSNsPCOL exhibited negative values at various pH values, probably due to the low COL content in particles.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.8. Zeta Potential Measurements
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“MSNsPCOL/CG-FA significantly inhibited all tested cancer cells lines than COL ranking in this order: HCT116 > HepG2 > PC3.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.10. In Vitro Anticancer Effects against Cancer Cells
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“MSNsPCOL/CG-FA had a maximum inhibition effect with 0.3 ± 0.05-fold change, followed by COL (0.46 ± 0.05-fold change), MSNsPCOL (1.5 ± 0.15-fold change), and 5-FU (10.06 ± 0.57-fold change) compared to positive control cells (~160-fold change).”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.20. Inhibition of MALAT-1 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“After 24 h, MSNsPCOL/CG-FA resulted in the maximum accumulation of cells at G2/M (14.8%), followed by 5-FU (12.4%), MSNsPCOL (11.2%), and COL (8.7%), with the lowest accumulation for MSNs (4.9%), MSNsP (4.8%), and untreated control (4.76%).”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.12. Cell Cycle Arrest at the G2/M Phase in HCT116 Cancer Cells
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Figure 5 presents the dependence of cell inhibition on concentration, time, cell line, and MSNs, with significant differences at p < 0.5.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.9. MSN Cytotoxicity Evaluation
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“MSNsPCOL/CG-FA inhibited 4% after 72 h, compared to 60% for COL, which indicates negligible effects.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.10. In Vitro Anticancer Effects against Cancer Cells
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“PD-1 reached 10.3 ± 0.2 and 11.2 ± 0.5 with free COL and 5-FU, respectively.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.23. Inhibition of PD-1 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Figure 11E shows the suppression of PD-1 checkpoint with significant changes compared control cells; the maximum inhibition level was reached at 9.8 ± 0.3 ng/mL and 10 ± 0.3 ng/mL for MSNsPCOL/CG-FA and MSNsPCOL, respectively, compared to 14 ± 0.5 ng/mL with positive control cells.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.23. Inhibition of PD-1 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Notably, MSNsPCOL/CG-FA had a gradual inhibitory effect compared to carriers; it had lower inhibition at 24 h and increased after 72 h, with a maximum inhibition of 80% when treated at 200 μg/mL.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.10. In Vitro Anticancer Effects against Cancer Cells
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A maximum inhibition of Ang-2 recorded for MSNsPCOL/CG-FA (174.0 ± 0.75 ng/mL) > MSNsPCOL (175.7 ± 1.0 ng/mL) > 5-FU (182.3 ± 1.15 ng/mL) > COL (188.6 ± 1 ng/mL) compared to positive control cells (213.3 ± 3.0 ng/mL).”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.22. Inhibition of Ang-2 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Clear differences were confirmed by IC50 calculations, as MSNsPCOL/CG-FA had lower values than MSNsPCOL and COL and reached 19.7 μg/mL after 24 h, 17.4 μg/mL after 48 h, and 17.0 μg/mL after 72 h.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.10. In Vitro Anticancer Effects against Cancer Cells
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The cell-killing was cell line-, concentration-, time-, and delivery method-dependent.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.23. Inhibition of PD-1 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The modulation of pro-apoptotic proteins is shared with apoptosis; treating cells with MSNsPCOL/CG-FA promoted Bax and inhibited Bcl-2 protein.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.23. Inhibition of PD-1 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Castedo et al. [15] proposed that the mitotic cell death catastrophe results from a combination of deficient cell-cycle checkpoints and cellular damage.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [15] Castedo, 2004, Cell death by mitotic catastrophe: A molecular definition, Oncogene source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Qi et al. provided evidence that, by arresting cell cycle progression in the presence of antimitotic drugs, mitotic spindles are disrupted, and cancer cells directly undergo apoptosis via the mitotic catastrophe [16].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [16] Qi, 2018, Anti-mitotic chemotherapeutics promote apoptosis through TL1A-activated death receptor 3 in cancer cells, Cell Res. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Therefore, it is considered a new potential target for cancer immunotherapy [19,21].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [19] Silva, 2016, The PD-1:PD-L1 immune inhibitory checkpoint in Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric cancer: A comprehensive review and future perspectives, Porto Biomed. J. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [21] Berntsson, 2018, Expression of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand PD-L1 in colorectal cancer: Relationship with sidedness and prognosis, Oncoimmunology source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This observation indicates successful preparation, in agreement with previous results [26,27,37,38].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.3. Surface Area Characteristics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] AbouAitah, 2018, Folic acid-conjugated mesoporous silica particles as nanocarriers of natural prodrugs for cancer targeting and antioxidant action, Oncotarget source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [27] Shahein, 2019, Targeted anticancer potential against glioma cells of thymoquinone delivered by mesoporous silica core-shell nanoformulations with pH-dependent release, Int. J. Nanomed. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [37] AbouAitah, K., Farghali, A., Swiderska-Sroda, A., Lojkowski, W., Razin, A., and Khedr, M.K. (2016). Mesoporous silica materials in drug delivery system: pH/glutathione-responsive release of poorly water-soluble pro-drug quercetin from two and three-dimensional pore-structure nanoparticles. J. Nanomed. Nanotechnol., 7. source
- Not checked yetcites [38] AbouAitah, K.E., Farghali, A., Swiderska-Sroda, A., Lojkowski, W., Razin, A., and Khedr, M.K. (2016). pH-controlled release system for curcumin based on functionalized dendritic mesoporous silica nanoparticles. J. Nanomed. Nanotechnol., 7.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“FA was employed as the main targeting ligand, which is known for its binding potential to folate receptors, which are over-expressed on many cancers and facilitate the endocytosis pathway [26,34,35,36].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] AbouAitah, 2018, Folic acid-conjugated mesoporous silica particles as nanocarriers of natural prodrugs for cancer targeting and antioxidant action, Oncotarget source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [34] Javaid, 2018, Advances in targeting the folate receptor in the treatment/imaging of cancers, Chem. Sci. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [35] Sabharanjak, 2004, Folate receptor endocytosis and trafficking, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. source
- Not checked yetcites [36] Zwicke, 2012, Utilizing the folate receptor for active targeting of cancer nanotherapeutics, Nano Rev. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Glycine was employed as a source of amino groups that require for cancer growth [33].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [33] Lukey, 2017, Targeting amino acid metabolism for cancer therapy, Drug Discov. Today source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This observation is expected because both chitosan and glycine are composed of amino groups, which is important for confirmation of the coating process.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.4. Elemental Content Analysis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We propose two reasons for this finding: Low loading and entrapment in pores.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.7. Simultaneous Thermal Analysis (STA-DSC) and XRD Characterization
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“MSNs have been investigated as a drug delivery carrier for several drugs and biomolecules [27,31,32].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [27] Shahein, 2019, Targeted anticancer potential against glioma cells of thymoquinone delivered by mesoporous silica core-shell nanoformulations with pH-dependent release, Int. J. Nanomed. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [31] Chang, 2013, Bioresponsive Controlled Drug Release Based on Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Coated with Reductively Sheddable Polymer Shell, Chem. Mater. source
- Not checked yetcites [32] Castillo, 2019, Advances in mesoporous silica nanoparticles for targeted stimuli-responsive drug delivery: An update, Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Despite the promising anticancer effects of COL, a few COL drug delivery systems (DDSs) have been tested to improve its therapeutic efficiency through cancer-targeting [28,29].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [28] Cauda, 2010, Colchicine-loaded lipid bilayer-coated 50 nm mesoporous nanoparticles efficiently induce microtubule depolymerization upon cell uptake, Nano Lett. source
- Not checked yetcites [29] Muvaffak, 2004, Prolonged cytotoxic effect of colchicine released from biodegradable microspheres, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and is a novel method of developing cancer immunotherapy using a low-cost small-molecule natural prodrug.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An explanation may be the coating used for most of the particles with a smaller size compared to particles with a larger size, leading to an increase in their average size in the sample.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.5. Particle Size Measurement
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, recent studies have revealed the intrinsic expression of PD-1 in many cancers, along with immune T cells [20,21].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] Yao, 2018, Cancer Cell-Intrinsic PD-1 and Implications in Combinatorial Immunotherapy, Front. Immunol. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [21] Berntsson, 2018, Expression of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand PD-L1 in colorectal cancer: Relationship with sidedness and prognosis, Oncoimmunology source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recently, antimitotic agents such as COL were reported to have a regulatory effect on most immune cell types, leading to the development of effective cancer immunotherapies [17].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [17] Fong, A., Durkin, A., and Lee, H. (2019). The Potential of Combining Tubulin-Targeting Anticancer Therapeutics and Immune Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 20. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
In the paper
“PD-1 is an inducible immune modulatory receptor expressed on surface-activated T cells, and its ligand PD-L1 is expressed on cancer cells [18].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [18] Fourcade, 2010, Upregulation of Tim-3 and PD-1 expression is associated with tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cell dysfunction in melanoma patients, J. Exp. Med. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, this study shows enhanced anticancer effects and reduced cytotoxicity of COL with targeted delivery compared to free COL”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Gupta and Dudani [13] proposed that the mechanism of action for antimitotic drugs, such as COL, includes blockade of cell growth at metaphase upon the binding of antimitotic drugs to tubulin (for COL through the colchicine binding site) due to cell-cycle arrest (e.g., at G2/M).”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [13] Gupta, 1989, Mechanism of action of antimitotic drugs: A new hypothesis based on the role of cellular calcium, Med. Hypotheses source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Therefore, cancer-targeting delivery systems with different nano-platforms have gained attention [25,26,27].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [25] Banerjee, 2017, Strategies for targeted drug delivery in treatment of colon cancer: Current trends and future perspectives, Drug Discov. Today source
- Not checked yetcites [26] AbouAitah, 2018, Folic acid-conjugated mesoporous silica particles as nanocarriers of natural prodrugs for cancer targeting and antioxidant action, Oncotarget source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [27] Shahein, 2019, Targeted anticancer potential against glioma cells of thymoquinone delivered by mesoporous silica core-shell nanoformulations with pH-dependent release, Int. J. Nanomed. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recently, the regulatory action by which antimitotic drugs inhibit PD-1 over-expression on the surface of T-cells was highlighted, and that PD-1 is strongly inhibited in the presence of the COL-binding site (CBS) of tubulin [23].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] Franchini, 2019, Microtubule-Driven Stress Granule Dynamics Regulate Inhibitory Immune Checkpoint Expression in T Cells, Cell Rep. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Binding PD-1 to PD-L1 leads to prevent from the immune antitumor effects by T cells against cancer cells [19].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [19] Silva, 2016, The PD-1:PD-L1 immune inhibitory checkpoint in Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric cancer: A comprehensive review and future perspectives, Porto Biomed. J. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It was reported that free COL decreased mitochondrial membrane potential in HT-29 colon cells, which led to intrinsic apoptotic cell death [6].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.18. Reduction of Mitochondrial Membrane Potential in HCT116 Cancer Cells
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [6] Huang, 2015, Colchicine induces apoptosis in HT29 human colon cancer cells via the AKT and c-Jun N-terminal kinase signaling pathways, Mol. Med. Rep. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This, because of the vasculature of tumors, is often leaky, leading to accumulating nanoparticles in the bloodstream compared to normal tissue [45].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.9. MSN Cytotoxicity Evaluation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [45] Tran, 2017, Cancer nanomedicine: A review of recent success in drug delivery, Clin. Transl. Med. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
In the paper
“Concerning the anti-apoptotic effect of CD44 expression in colon cancer, Lakshman et al. previously reported that it prevents the apoptosis killing pathway because it promotes cell transformation into a malignant phenotype with the help of other anti-apoptotic factors in the tumor microenvironment [75].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.19. Inhibition of CD44 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [75] Lakshman, 2004, CD44 promotes resistance to apoptosis in human colon cancer cells, Exp. Mol. Pathol. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The enhanced antimitotic effects block cancer cell growth due to the binding of COL to tubulin in cells, leading to cell death.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.23. Inhibition of PD-1 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results create an opportunity to develop a new approach of PD-1 inhibitors through further ongoing research.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.23. Inhibition of PD-1 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: These are the first results for COL or a DDS as a small drug molecule.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, mir-205 has also been reported to be downregulated in colon cancer [88].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.21. Attenuation of mir-205 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [88] Orang, 2014, Diagnostic and prognostic value of miR-205 in colorectal cancer, Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“As a result, cells cannot enter mitosis prior to repairing their DNA damage, resulting in apoptosis or death after their division [53] through various molecular signaling pathways [54,55].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.12. Cell Cycle Arrest at the G2/M Phase in HCT116 Cancer Cells
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [53] Cuddihy, 2003, Cell-cycle responses to DNA damage in G2, Int. Rev. Cytol. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [54] Johnstone, 2002, Apoptosis: A Link between Cancer Genetics and Chemotherapy, Cell source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [55] Hengartner, 2000, The biochemistry of apoptosis, Nature source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a previous study of colon cancer cells, Park et al. reported that knockdown of CD44 leads to inhibition of cell proliferation and induction of apoptosis [71].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.19. Inhibition of CD44 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [71] Park, 2012, shRNA against CD44 inhibits cell proliferation, invasion and migration, and promotes apoptosis of colon carcinoma cells, Oncol. Rep.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“We propose that the action for MSNsPCOL/CG-FA is the release of COL molecules into cells after folate receptor–folic acid interaction; the COL binds to tubulin in cells through colchicine binding sites, destabilizing tubulin [50], and further interferes with microtubule dynamics.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.11. Inhibition of Tubulin Activity in HCT116 Cancer Cells
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [50] Lu, 2012, An overview of tubulin inhibitors that interact with the colchicine binding site, Pharm. Res. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
In the paper
“In a study by Schmittnaegel et al., inhibition of Ang-2 together with vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) enhanced the antitumor immunity, allowing PD-1 checkpoint inhibition [89].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.22. Inhibition of Ang-2 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [89] Schmittnaegel, M., Rigamonti, N., Kadioglu, E., Cassara, A., Wyser Rmili, C., Kiialainen, A., Kienast, Y., Mueller, H.J., Ooi, C.H., and Laoui, D. (2017). Dual angiopoietin-2 and VEGFA inhibition elicits antitumor immunity that is enhanced by PD-1 checkpoint blockade. Sci. Transl. Med., 9. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the anticancer effect of free COL or enhanced delivery route is in response to inherited antimitotic effects from COL.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.10. In Vitro Anticancer Effects against Cancer Cells
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, either MSNs or MSNsP is a promising nanocarrier for COL delivery.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.9. MSN Cytotoxicity Evaluation
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“They mentioned that cancer cells uptake more MSNs than normal cells, and MSNs are more cytotoxic for cancer cells compared normal cells.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.9. MSN Cytotoxicity Evaluation
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [39] Menon, 2016, Cytotoxic Effects of Phosphonate-Functionalized Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Thus, mir-205 may be a potential tumor marker and therapeutic target [87].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.21. Attenuation of mir-205 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [87] Jing, 2018, Expression levels of miR-205 and miR-506 in colon cancer tissues and their relationships with clinicopathological features, Oncol. Lett. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
In the paper
“This finding agrees with previously published data for MCF-7 cells and BJ cells treated with MSNs and phosphonate-functionalized MSNs [39].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.9. MSN Cytotoxicity Evaluation
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [39] Menon, 2016, Cytotoxic Effects of Phosphonate-Functionalized Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It was shown that expression levels of folate receptors vary depending on type of cancer and the colorectal cancers show higher level than liver and prostate cancers [47].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.10. In Vitro Anticancer Effects against Cancer Cells
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [47] Cheung, 2016, Targeting folate receptor alpha for cancer treatment, Oncotarget source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
In the paper
“The G2/M checkpoint inhibitor class of drugs leads to DNA damage, preventing cells from passing mitosis and stopping their proliferation.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.12. Cell Cycle Arrest at the G2/M Phase in HCT116 Cancer Cells
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [53] Cuddihy, 2003, Cell-cycle responses to DNA damage in G2, Int. Rev. Cytol. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several reports have demonstrated that COL can arrest at G2/M in different cancer cells [7,56].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.12. Cell Cycle Arrest at the G2/M Phase in HCT116 Cancer Cells
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [7] Zhang, 2016, High-throughput drug library screening identifies colchicine as a thyroid cancer inhibitor, Oncotarget source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [56] Kim, 2013, The colchicine derivative CT20126 shows a novel microtubule-modulating activity with apoptosis, Exp. Mol. Med. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The reason for this is that the anticancer effect is in response to COL release from nanoformulations because it is controlled by a coating that needs some time for degradation.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.10. In Vitro Anticancer Effects against Cancer Cells
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In recent years, emerging indications are that lncRNAs, non-protein coding transcripts longer than 200 nucleotides, are responsible for a broad spectrum of biological impacts with gene regulation and other functions in many diseases [76,77].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.20. Inhibition of MALAT-1 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [76] Ponting, 2009, Evolution and Functions of Long Noncoding RNAs, Cell source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [77] Zhao, 2018, MALAT1: A long non-coding RNA highly associated with human cancers, Oncol. Lett. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although many approved therapies are efficient in cancer (e.g., nivolumab and pembrolizumab), they have many limitations, including side effects, toxicity, internal response changes in the immune system, and expense [94,95].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.23. Inhibition of PD-1 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [94] Ottaviano, 2019, Recent success and limitations of immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer: A lesson from melanoma, Virchows Arch. Int. J. Pathol. source
- Not checked yetcites [95] Seidel, 2018, Anti-PD-1 and Anti-CTLA-4 Therapies in Cancer: Mechanisms of Action, Efficacy, and Limitations, Front. Oncol. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In addition, Kim et al. indicated that Ang-2 maybe play a crucial role as an oncogene in colorectal carcinogenesis, supporting tumor progression as a prognostic marker [90].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.22. Inhibition of Ang-2 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [90] Kim, 2017, Oncogenic function of angiopoietin-2 in vitro and its modulation of tumor progression in colorectal carcinoma, Oncol. Lett. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“CD44 is well-recognized as a robust marker (via overexpression) of colon cancer initiation because it promotes cell adhesion, maintains cell–matrix interactions [73], and induces anti-apoptotic properties [71,74].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.19. Inhibition of CD44 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [73] Sahlberg, S.H., Spiegelberg, D., Glimelius, B., Stenerlow, B., and Nestor, M. (2014). Evaluation of cancer stem cell markers CD133, CD44, CD24: Association with AKT isoforms and radiation resistance in colon cancer cells. PLoS ONE, 9. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [71] Park, 2012, shRNA against CD44 inhibits cell proliferation, invasion and migration, and promotes apoptosis of colon carcinoma cells, Oncol. Rep.
- Not checked yetcites [74] Schneider, M., Huber, J., Hadaschik, B., Siegers, G.M., Fiebig, H.H., and Schuler, J. (2012). Characterization of colon cancer cells: A functional approach characterizing CD133 as a potential stem cell marker. BMC Cancer, 12. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Therefore, it is considered as a new potential for cancer therapy [19] and efficient treatments [92].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.23. Inhibition of PD-1 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [19] Silva, 2016, The PD-1:PD-L1 immune inhibitory checkpoint in Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric cancer: A comprehensive review and future perspectives, Porto Biomed. J. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [92] Khalil, 2016, The future of cancer treatment: Immunomodulation, CARs and combination immunotherapy. Nature reviews, Clin. Oncol. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recent studies have revealed the intrinsic expression of PD-1 in many cancers, along with T immune cells [20,21].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.23. Inhibition of PD-1 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] Yao, 2018, Cancer Cell-Intrinsic PD-1 and Implications in Combinatorial Immunotherapy, Front. Immunol. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked yetcites [21] Berntsson, 2018, Expression of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand PD-L1 in colorectal cancer: Relationship with sidedness and prognosis, Oncoimmunology source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From the observations, the proposed delivery route has an enhanced anticancer effect with a longer duration to 72 h.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.10. In Vitro Anticancer Effects against Cancer Cells
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors act by blocking the PD-1 protein and activate the immune system to treat many tumors [22,93].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.23. Inhibition of PD-1 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [22] Syn, 2017, De-novo and acquired resistance to immune checkpoint targeting, Lancet Oncol. source
- Not checked yetcites [93] Webb, 2018, Immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy, J. Biomed. Res. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Jing et al. showed that the expression of mir-205 is upregulated in plasma from colon cancer patients, permitting the occurrence and development of the cancer.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.21. Attenuation of mir-205 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [87] Jing, 2018, Expression levels of miR-205 and miR-506 in colon cancer tissues and their relationships with clinicopathological features, Oncol. Lett. source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, genetic regulation and immunotherapeutic effects have a role.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.23. Inhibition of PD-1 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In a next step, it releases COL into cancer cells, which can bind to the tubulin forming the microtubules in the cellular skeleton, resulting in tubulin inhibition.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.23. Inhibition of PD-1 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The assay was performed as instructed in the kit.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 3. Materials and Methods > 3.2. Methods
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We propose that the anticancer mechanism is mainly apoptosis cell death, with the contribution of genetic regulation and immunotherapy effects.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.23. Inhibition of PD-1 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Apoptosis (intrinsic) was found to be the main mechanism of action occurring as a consequence of the strong antimitotic effects.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 4. Conclusions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Measurements were made in triplicate.”
- Also stated in: § 3.2. Methods · plain
“Finally, measurements were made in triplicate.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 3. Materials and Methods > 3.2. Methods
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § 3.2. Methods · plain
In the paper
“For the estimation of in vitro cytotoxic potency, the 3-4,5-dimethylthiazol-Z-yl-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was conducted according to Mosmann [96].”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 3. Materials and Methods > 3.2. Methods
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [96] Mosmann, 1983, Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays, J. Immunol. Methods source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The reactions were performed in triplicate on a Rotor-Gene 3000 RT-PCR system.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 3. Materials and Methods > 3.2. Methods
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Measurements were made in triplicate.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 3. Materials and Methods > 3.2. Methods
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The observations provide strong evidence of the intrinsic apoptosis mechanism due to enhanced cytochrome c triggering and reduce the mitochondrial membrane potential, in agreement with the literature.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.23. Inhibition of PD-1 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The assay was performed in triplicate, and data are expressed as mean ± SD.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 3. Materials and Methods > 3.2. Methods
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The authors state this as an assumption.
No data are available yet on the effects of COL on MALAT1 inhibition or promotion.
“To the best of our knowledge, no data are available yet on the effects of COL on MALAT1 inhibition or promotion.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
No data are available yet on the effects of COL in either downregulating or upregulating mir-205 in cancer.
“To the best of our knowledge, there are no data available yet on the effects of COL in either downregulating or upregulating mir-205 in cancer.”
The paper relies on this without support.
These are the first results for COL or a DDS as a small drug molecule.
“These are the first results for COL or a DDS as a small drug molecule.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The results for MALAT1, mir-205, and PD-1 with COL and its delivery in HCT116 cancer cells were obtained for the first time.
“To the best of our knowledge, the results for MALAT1, mir-205, and PD-1 with COL and its delivery in HCT116 cancer cells were obtained for the first time.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Ang-2 is a pro-angiogenic cytokine that maintains angiogenesis and restricts the antitumor immune response from attacking cancer cells.
“Ang-2 is a pro-angiogenic cytokine that maintains angiogenesis and restricts the antitumor immune response from attacking cancer cells.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Arresting cells at the G2/M phase results in apoptosis.
“Arresting cells at the G2/M phase results in apoptosis.”
The paper relies on this without support.
NanoDrop2000 is very accurate for measuring even the smallest quantities of RNA.
“The concentration of RNA was determined using NanoDrop2000, which is very accurate for measuring even the smallest quantities of RNA (NanoDrop2000, Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, NC, USA).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Various types of materials have been used to fabricate nanoparticles for colorectal cancer treatment including liposomal,143 polymeric, inorganic,144 mesoporous silica nanoparticles.145”
From Current Advances in Chitosan Nanoparticles Based Oral Drug Delivery for Colorectal Cancer Treatment (2022) · cites this paper as [145]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.10. In Vitro Anticancer Effects against Cancer Cells
“MSNsPCOL/CG-FA inhibited 4% after 72 h, compared to 60% for COL”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.23. Inhibition of PD-1 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
“In addition, MSNsPCOL/CG-FA had less toxicity towards normal cells (10%) than COL (60%).”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.23. Inhibition of PD-1 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
“Thus, at all concentrations, MSNsPCOL/CG-FA was more efficient than COL in HCT116 cells.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.23. Inhibition of PD-1 Expression in HCT116 Cancer Cells
“MSNsPCOL/CG-FA and COL had equal inhibition (100%) at 200 µg/mL.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.5. Particle Size Measurement
“leading to an increase in their average size in the sample.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.5. Particle Size Measurement
“Unexpectedly, MSNsPCOL/CG-FA size decreased to 330 ± 22.2 nm compared to MSNsPCOL.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 4. Conclusions
“The DDS was fabricated by loading COL into spherical mesoporous silica nanoparticles and their subsequent modification with phosphonate groups.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 3. Materials and Methods > 3.2. Methods
“To load COL into MSNsP, we followed our previous method with some modification [38]:”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.10. In Vitro Anticancer Effects against Cancer Cells
“the anticancer activity against HepG2 cells was ranked in the following order: MSNsPCOL/CG-FA > COL > MSNsPCOL/CG-FA.”
§ Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery of Colchicine against Colon Cancer Cells by Means of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles > 2. Results and Discussion > 2.10. In Vitro Anticancer Effects against Cancer Cells
“MSNsPCOL/CG-FA exhibited high inhibition (80–82%), especially at 100 and 200 μg/mL, compared to MSNsPCOL and COL.”
Citations
Cites
Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method
Livak, K. J., & Schmittgen, T. D. (2001) · Methods · doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262 · Cited by 180,860
Mosmann, T. (1983) · Journal of Immunological Methods · doi:10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4 · Cited by 56,104
The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14
Lee, R. C., Feinbaum, R. L., & Ambros, V. (1993) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90529-y · Cited by 12,948
Genetic Alterations during Colorectal-Tumor Development
Vogelstein, B., Fearon, E. R., Hamilton, S. R., Kern, S. E., Preisinger, A. C., Leppert, M., de Vries-Smits, A. M. M., & Bos, J. L. (1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198809013190901 · Cited by 6,704
Oncomirs—MicroRNAs with a role in cancer
Esquela-Kerscher, A., & Slack, F. J. (2006) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1840 · Cited by 5,884
Hengartner, M. O. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35037710 · Cited by 5,779
Evolution and Functions of Long Noncoding RNAs
Ponting, C. P., Oliver, P. L., & Reik, W. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.006 · Cited by 4,208
Microtubules as a target for anticancer drugs
Jordan, M. A., & Wilson, L. (2004) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1317 · Cited by 4,000
Mutation of the mouse klotho gene leads to a syndrome resembling ageing
Kuro-o, M., Matsumura, Y., Aizawa, H., Kawaguchi, H., Suga, T., Utsugi, T., Ohyama, Y., Kurabayashi, M., Kaname, T., Kume, E., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/36285 · Cited by 3,837
Bcl-2 gene promotes haemopoietic cell survival and cooperates with c-myc to immortalize pre-B cells
Vaux, D., Cory, S., & Adams, J. (1988) · Nature · doi:10.1038/335440a0 · Cited by 3,355
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wojnarowicz, J., Chudoba, T., & Łojkowski, W. (2020) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano10061086 · Cited by 388
Self-citationColchicine Alkaloids and Synthetic Analogues: Current Progress and Perspectives
Gracheva, I. A., Shchegravina, E. S., Schmalz, H., Beletskaya, I. P., & Fedorov, A. Y. (2020) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00222 · Cited by 130
Current Advances in Chitosan Nanoparticles Based Oral Drug Delivery for Colorectal Cancer Treatment
Choukaife, H., Seyam, S., Alallam, B., Doolaanea, A. A., & Alfatama, M. (2022) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s375229 · Cited by 127
Hou, Y., Jin, J., Duan, H., Liu, C., Chen, L., Huang, W., Gao, Z., & Jin, M. (2022) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121440 · Cited by 127
Targeting endothelial permeability in the EPR effect
Lahooti, B., Akwii, R. G., Zahra, F. T., Sajib, M. S., Λάμπρου, Μ., Alobaida, A., Lionakis, M. S., Mattheolabakis, G., & Mikelis, C. M. (2023) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.07.039 · Cited by 114
Natural compounds-based nanomedicines for cancer treatment: Future directions and challenges
Andreani, T., Cheng, R., Elbadri, K., Ferro, C., de Menezes, T. I., Santos, M. R. D., Pereira, C. M. D. M., & Santos, H. A. (2024) · Drug Delivery and Translational Research · doi:10.1007/s13346-024-01649-z · Cited by 113
How Advancing are Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles? A Comprehensive Review of the Literature
Porrang, S., Davaran, S., Rahemi, N., Allahyari, S., & Mostafavi, E. (2022) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s353349 · Cited by 106
Mesoporous Silica Materials as an Emerging Tool for Cancer Immunotherapy
Escriche‐Navarro, B., Escudero, A. C., Lucena‐Sánchez, E., Sancenón, F., García‐Fernández, A., & Martínez‐Máñez, R. (2022) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202200756 · Cited by 101
Jin, K., Lu, Z.-B., Chen, J., Liu, Y., Lan, H., Dong, H., Yang, F., Zhao, Y., & Chen, X. (2020) · Journal of Nanomaterials · doi:10.1155/2020/9184284 · Cited by 82
Polymeric functionalization of mesoporous silica nanoparticles: Biomedical insights
Nair, A., Hariharapura, R. C., Day, C. M., Garg, S., Nayak, Y., Shenoy, P. A., & Nayak, U. Y. (2024) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124314 · Cited by 75
Multimodal Decorations of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Improved Cancer Therapy
Barui, S., & Cauda, V. (2020) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12060527 · Cited by 73
Application of smart nanoparticles as a potential platform for effective colorectal cancer therapy
Iranpour, S., Bahrami, A. R., Saljooghi, A. S., & Matin, M. M. (2021) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2021.213949 · Cited by 66
Recent advances in targeted drug delivery systems for resistant colorectal cancer
Sharifi-Azad, M., Fathi, M., Cho, W. C., Barzegari, A., Dadashi, H., Dadashpour, M., & Jahanban-Esfahlan, R. (2022) · Cancer Cell International · doi:10.1186/s12935-022-02605-y · Cited by 65
Khatami, F., Matin, M. M., Danesh, N. M., Bahrami, A. R., Abnous, K., & Taghdisi, S. M. (2021) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118111 · Cited by 65
Theivendren, P., Kunjiappan, S., Pavadai, P., Ravi, K., Murugavel, A., Dayalan, A., & Kumar, A. S. K. (2024) · ACS Measurement Science Au · doi:10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.4c00062 · Cited by 65
Mi, S., Gong, L., & Sui, Z. (2020) · Journal of Cancer · doi:10.7150/jca.46200 · Cited by 58
Nano-immunotherapy for each stage of cancer cellular immunity: which, why, and what?
Zuo, S., Song, J., Zhang, J., He, Z., Sun, B., & Sun, J. (2021) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.59953 · Cited by 56
AbouAitah, K., & Łojkowski, W. (2021) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics13020143 · Cited by 55
Self-citationTargeting the Gut: A Systematic Review of Specific Drug Nanocarriers
Garbati, P., Picco, C., Magrassi, R., Signorello, P., Cacopardo, L., Serra, M. D., Faticato, M. G., Luca, M. D., Balestra, F., Scavo, M. P., et al. (2024) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics16030431 · Cited by 53
Kamazani, F. M., Sotoodehnejadnematalahi, F., Siadat, S. D., Pornour, M., & Sheikhpour, M. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-03031-2 · Cited by 47
Imran, H., Tang, Y., Wang, S., Yan, X., Liu, C., Guo, L., Wang, E., & Xu, C. (2023) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules29010031 · Cited by 43
AbouAitah, K., Świderska‐Środa, A., Kandeil, A., Salman, A., Wojnarowicz, J., Ali, M. A., Opalinska, A., Gierlotka, S., Ciach, T., & Łojkowski, W. (2020) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s247692 · Cited by 42
Self-citationSargazi, S., Laraib, U., Barani, M., Rahdar, A., Fatima, I., Bilal, M., Pandey, S., Sharma, R. K., & Kyzas, G. Z. (2022) · Journal of Molecular Structure · doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.132922 · Cited by 39
Emerging Prodrug-Engineered nanomedicines for synergistic Chemo-Phototherapy
Shan, X., Zhao, Z., Wang, C., Sun, J., He, Z., Luo, C., & Zhang, S. (2022) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2022.136383 · Cited by 39
Nanomedicine as an Emerging Technology to Foster Application of Essential Oils to Fight Cancer
AbouAitah, K., & Łojkowski, W. (2022) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph15070793 · Cited by 38
Self-citationFunctionalized Carbon Nanotubes for Delivery of Ferulic Acid and Diosgenin Anticancer Natural Agents
AbouAitah, K., Abdelaziz, A. M., Higazy, I. M., Świderska‐Środa, A., Hassan, A. M. E., Shaker, O. G., Szałaj, U., Stobiński, L., Małolepszy, A., & Łojkowski, W. (2024) · ACS Applied Bio Materials · doi:10.1021/acsabm.3c00700 · Cited by 37
Self-citationWhen metal–organic framework mediated smart drug delivery meets gastrointestinal cancers
Hashemzadeh, A., Drummen, G. P. C., Avan, A., Darroudi, M., Khazaei, M., Khajavian, R., Rangrazi, A., & Mirzaei, M. (2021) · Journal of Materials Chemistry B · doi:10.1039/d1tb00155h · Cited by 37
Li, Y., Deng, G.-X., Hu, X., Li, C., Wang, X., Zhu, Q., Zheng, K., Xiong, W., & Wu, H. (2022) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/nnm-2022-0023 · Cited by 36
The Opportunities and Challenges of Silica Nanomaterial for Atherosclerosis
Sha, X., Dai, Y., Song, X., Liu, Y., Zhang, S., & Li, J. (2021) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s290537 · Cited by 31
Ergül, M., & Bakar‐Ates, F. (2021) · Toxicology in Vitro · doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2021.105138 · Cited by 30
AbouAitah, K., Soliman, A. A. F., Świderska‐Środa, A., Nassrallah, A., Smalc‐Koziorowska, J., Gierlotka, S., & Łojkowski, W. (2022) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14122770 · Cited by 29
Self-citationSharifi-Azad, M., Zenjanab, M. K., Shahpouri, M., Adili-Aghdam, M. A., Fathi, M., & Jahanban‐Esfahlan, R. (2024) · Biomedical Materials · doi:10.1088/1748-605x/ad5d9b · Cited by 27
Strategies of nanomedicine for targeting the signaling pathways of Colorectal cancer
Habeeb, M., You, H. W., Aher, K. B., Bhavar, G. B., Khot, V. S., & Mishra, S. (2023) · Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2023.104487 · Cited by 24
Fakhri, S., Moradi, S. Z., Faraji, F., Farhadi, T., Hesami, O., Iranpanah, A., Webber, K. J., & Bishayee, A. (2023) · Cancer and Metastasis Reviews · doi:10.1007/s10555-023-10119-w · Cited by 24
Delivery Strategies for Colchicine as a Critical Dose Drug: Reducing Toxicity and Enhancing Efficacy
Lei, Y., Yang, Y., Yang, G., Li, A., Yang, Y., Wang, Y., & Gao, C. (2024) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics16020222 · Cited by 23
Priming immunity via herbal components and their nanomedicines for the treatment of cancer
Li, X., Gong, C., Naeem, A., Liu, J., Yang, M., Zhang, J., & Shang, H. (2024) · Acupuncture and Herbal Medicine · doi:10.1097/hm9.0000000000000135 · Cited by 22
Sathuvan, M., Min, S., Narayanan, K., Gaur, A., Hong, H., Vivek, R., Ganapathy, A., Cheong, K., Kang, H., & Thangam, R. (2024) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2024.157272 · Cited by 19
Tammam, S. N., Elsafy, S., Ramadan, S., Arjune, S., Krakor, E., & Mathur, S. (2021) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.07.028 · Cited by 19
Sadeghzadeh, F., Ziaratnia, A. S., Tabrizi, M. H., Torshizi, G. H., Alhajamee, M., & Khademi, D. (2022) · Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition · doi:10.1080/09205063.2022.2105103 · Cited by 18
Bag, J., Banerjee, S., De, A., Manna, S., Banerjee, S., Kumar, S. K. A., & De, S. (2023) · Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1186/s43094-023-00541-w · Cited by 18
Rubicondo, M., Ciardelli, G., Mattu, C., & Tuszyński, J. A. (2025) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2025.104312 · Cited by 17
Piotrowska, U., Szatko, J., Nowakowska, A., Klimaszewska, E., Ogorzałek, M., & Sobczak, M. (2025) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md23120467 · Cited by 14
Yeh, J., Liw, P.-X., Wong, Y., Kao, H.-M., Lee, C.-H., Lin, C., & Kao, C. (2024) · European journal of medical research · doi:10.1186/s40001-024-01836-1 · Cited by 14
Drug delivery systems as immunomodulators for therapy of infectious disease: Relevance to COVID-19
Brain, D. E., Plant-Hately, A. J., Heaton, B. J., Arshad, U., David, C. A. W., Hedrich, C. M., Owen, A., & Liptrott, N. J. (2021) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2021.113848 · Cited by 13
Causal associations between liver traits and Colorectal cancer: a Mendelian randomization study
Ni, Y., Wang, W., Liu, Y., & Jiang, Y. (2023) · BMC Medical Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12920-023-01755-w · Cited by 13
Nanoformulations of Plant-Derived Compounds as Emerging Therapeutic Approach for Colorectal Cancer
Biganeh, H., Dizaji, S. M., Taghipour, Y. D., Murtaza, G., & Rahimi, R. (2022) · Current Drug Delivery · doi:10.2174/1567201819666220823155526 · Cited by 12
Mesoporous selenium nanoparticles for therapeutic goals: a review
Asl, F. D., Mousazadeh, M., Azimzadeh, M., & Ghaani, M. R. (2022) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1007/s11051-022-05572-7 · Cited by 12
Bao, L., Cui, X., Bai, R., & Chen, C. (2022) · Nano Research · doi:10.1007/s12274-022-5150-4 · Cited by 12
AbouAitah, K., Hassan, H. A., Ammar, N. M., Baker, D. H. A., Higazy, I. M., Shaker, O. G., El-Sayed, A., & Hassan, A. M. E. (2023) · Cancer Nanotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12645-022-00152-9 · Cited by 12
Self-citationKwon, M. J., Han, K. M., Kim, J., Kim, J. H., Kim, M.-J., Kim, N. Y., Choi, H. G., & Kang, H. S. (2023) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers15235602 · Cited by 11
Budiman, A., Mutmainah, L., Anjelina, M., Fitriawati, M. K., Pilihanto, E. I., Amaliah, S., & Aulifa, D. L. (2025) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s538100 · Cited by 10
Mirveis, Z., Kouchak, M., Mahdavinia, M., & Rahbar, N. (2021) · Journal of Liposome Research · doi:10.1080/08982104.2021.2005624 · Cited by 10
Rao, H., Wang, Q., Zeng, X., Wen, X., & Huang, L. (2023) · Clinical & Translational Oncology · doi:10.1007/s12094-023-03314-2 · Cited by 9
Golrokh, F. J., Tolami, H. F., Ghanbarirad, M., Mahmoudi, A., Tabassi, N. R., Alkinani, T. A., Taramsari, S. M., Aghajani, S., Taati, H., Akbari, F., et al. (2023) · Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtemb.2023.127369 · Cited by 9
Engineered nanomaterials enhance drug delivery strategies for the treatment of osteosarcoma
Zhang, H., Luo, P., & Huang, X. (2023) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2023.1269224 · Cited by 9
Enhanced Killing of Colon Cancer Cells by Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Loaded with Ellagic Acid
AbouAitah, K., Nassrallah, A., Soliman, A. A. F., Świderska‐Środa, A., Chudoba, T., Smalc‐Koziorowska, J., Kim, B. S., & Łojkowski, W. (2025) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano15201547 · Cited by 8
Self-citationDelivery of cisplatin and resiquimod in nanomicelles for the chemoimmunotherapy of ovarian cancer
Yin, W., & Qian, S. (2022) · Cancer Nanotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12645-021-00094-8 · Cited by 8
Zumaya, A. L. V., Pavlíčková, V. S., Rimpelová, S., Štějdířová, M., Fulem, M., Křížová, I., Ulbrich, P., Řezanka, P., & Hassouna, F. (2024) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124170 · Cited by 8
Size-Dependent Biodistribution of Fluorescent Furano-Allocolchicinoid-Chitosan Formulations in Mice
Gracheva, I., Konovalova, M. V., Aronov, D., Moiseeva, E. V., Fedorov, A. Y., & Svirshchevskaya, E. V. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13132045 · Cited by 8
Gök, Y., Arlı, O. T., Gök, Y., & Türkaslan, T. (2023) · Journal of Porous Materials · doi:10.1007/s10934-023-01472-w · Cited by 7
Ben‐Haim, A. E., Shalev, N., Amalraj, A. J. J., Zelinger, E., Mani, K. A., Belausov, E., Shoval, I., Nativ‐Roth, E., Maria, R., Atkins, A., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.140822 · Cited by 7
Choi, J. W., Bae, S.-H., Kim, I. Y., Kwak, M., Lee, T. G., & Heo, M. B. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.03.18.436024 · Cited by 7
Wang, S., Cui, Z., Zhu, J., Zhou, P., Cao, X., Li, X., Ma, Y., & He, Q. (2023) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2023.09.006 · Cited by 6
Spada, A., Emami, J., Sanaee, F., Aminpour, M., Igor, M., Tuszyński, J. A., & Lavasanifar, A. (2021) · Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.18433/jpps31877 · Cited by 6
Overview of chitosan-based nanosystems for prostate cancer therapy
de Araújo, J. T. C., Tavares, A. G., Filippo, L. D. D., Duarte, J. L., Ribeiro, T. D. C., & Chorilli, M. (2021) · European Polymer Journal · doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110812 · Cited by 6
Hamida, R. S., Albasher, G. I., & Bin-Meferij, M. M. (2023) · Journal of Nanomaterials · doi:10.1155/2023/4648571 · Cited by 5
Aulifa, D. L., Maharani, A., Purnomo, K., Salsabilla, R., Fahlevi, Z., Pramudita, F. W., Wibisono, T., Amaliah, S., Subra, L., & Budiman, A. (2026) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s604271 · Cited by 3
Natural product-based nanotechnological formulations for colorectal cancer treatment
Wu, L.-F., Wu, J., Wang, X., Xu, Y., Lin, Z., Chen, J., & Wu, X. (2025) · Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00210-025-04175-y · Cited by 3
Functionalized biopolymers for colon-targeted drug delivery
Abbasi, Y. F., & Hasan, S. M. F. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-821437-4.00006-2 · Cited by 3
AbouAitah, K., Bu, Y., Sharma, M., & Kim, B. S. (2025) · FlatChem · doi:10.1016/j.flatc.2025.100824 · Cited by 2
Self-citationNanomedicines for the Treatment of Bacterial Diseases
Siddique, R., Saleem, A., Muhammad, F., Akhtar, M. F., Akhtar, B., & Sharif, A. (2023) · Learning materials in biosciences · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-7626-3_3 · Cited by 2
AbouAitah, K., Kim, B. S., & Łojkowski, W. (2024) · Nanotechnology Reviews · doi:10.1515/ntrev-2024-0102 · Cited by 2
Self-citationTaymouri, S., Mirseyfifard, S., & Shafiee, F. (2025) · Therapeutic Delivery · doi:10.1080/20415990.2025.2520735 · Cited by 2
Role of Natural Bioactive Compounds in the Rise and Fall of Cancers
Luparello, C. (2020) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers12092499 · Cited by 2
Fan, J., Miao, X., & Zhang, Z. (2023) · Journal of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering · doi:10.1166/jbt.2023.3234 · Cited by 1
Ali, H. A.-A., Bejaud, J., Lautram, N., Dupont, A., & Eyer, J. (2025) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics X · doi:10.1016/j.ijpx.2025.100382 · Cited by 1
Mohan, S., Jarin, T., & Deepanraj, B. (2025) · Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology · doi:10.55214/2576-8484.v9i9.10283 · Cited by 1
miR‑205: A dual regulator of angiogenesis in health and disease (Review)
Oltra, M. R., Martínez-Santos, M., Ybarra, M., Pires, M. E., Ceresoni, C., Gomis-Coloma, C., Medina‐Trillo, C., Sancho-Pellúz, J., & Barcia, J. M. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Medicine · doi:10.3892/ijmm.2025.5722 · Cited by 1
Rajkumar, M., Prathap, N., Kashid, V. A., Prajapati, B. G., Palani, K., Sudha, P. N., Prabhakaran, R., & Basu, B. (2026) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics18081044 · Cited by 1
Sumi, S. A., Saha, S., Sultana, N., Islam, T., Mohiuddin, G. G., Ali, S., & Hussain, M. S. (2026) · ChemistrySelect · doi:10.1002/slct.74418 · Cited by 1
Nanotechnology in ROS-induced Cancer Therapy
Singh, D., & Sahoo, A. (2022) · Handbook of Oxidative Stress in Cancer: Therapeutic Aspects · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-5422-0_118 · Cited by 1
Importance of Nanocarriers in Colon Cancer
Srivastava, N., Mishra, Y., & Mishra, V. K. (2023) · BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBLISHERS eBooks · doi:10.2174/9789815080506123010011 · Cited by 1
Eid, N., Al-Karmalawy, A. A., Eldebss, T. M. A., & Abdelhakim, H. K. (2024) · Chemistry & Biodiversity · doi:10.1002/cbdv.202302081 · Cited by 1
Bionanotechnological Strategies and Tools for Cancer Prediction, Prevention and Therapy
Narayan, S. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-3746-2_9 · Cited by 1
Role of Natural Bioactive Compounds in the Rise and Fall of Cancers
Luparello, C. (2020) · MDPI eBooks · doi:10.3390/books978-3-03943-293-6
Nanotechnology in ROS-induced Cancer Therapy
Singh, D., & Sahoo, A. (2021) · Handbook of Oxidative Stress in Cancer: Therapeutic Aspects · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-1247-3_118-1
Role of Natural Bioactive Compounds in the Rise and Fall of Cancers
Luparello, C. (2020) · MDPI eBooks · doi:10.3390/books978-3-03943-255-4
Development of Biocompatible Nanocarriers for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer
Neerooa, B. N. H. M., Anuar, N. A. B. S., Brianna, B., Yusefi, M., Shameli, K., & Teow, S. (2023) · Interdisciplinary cancer research · doi:10.1007/16833_2023_158
Formulation development and toxicological assessment of colchicine-loaded nanocapsules
Ribeiro, A. C. F., Maciel, T. R., Pacheco, C. O., Agarrayua, D. A., Savall, A. S. P., Monteiro, E., Cardoso, C. O., Filho, M. C., Gelfuso, G. M., Ávila, D. S., et al. (2025) · Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2025.106722
Hydrophilic and lipophilic colchicinoid formulations for therapy of liver fibrosis in murine model
Svirshchevskaya, E. V., Shchegravina, E. S., Gracheva, Y. A., Konovalova, M. V., Акопов, С. Б., Tretiakova, D. S., Rysina, Y. D., Zapevalova, M. V., Schmalz, H., Koroev, D. O., et al. (2025) · Bioorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bioorg.2025.109397
Yeh, J.-J., Liw, P.-X., Wong, Y.-S., Kao, H.-M., Lee, C.-H., Lin, C.-L., & Kao, C.-H. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.25670180
Yeh, J.-J., Liw, P.-X., Wong, Y.-S., Kao, H.-M., Lee, C.-H., Lin, C.-L., & Kao, C.-H. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26709812
Yeh, J.-J., Liw, P.-X., Wong, Y.-S., Kao, H.-M., Lee, C.-H., Lin, C.-L., & Kao, C.-H. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.25670309
Yeh, J.-J., Liw, P.-X., Wong, Y.-S., Kao, H.-M., Lee, C.-H., Lin, C.-L., & Kao, C.-H. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26709809
Yeh, J.-J., Liw, P.-X., Wong, Y.-S., Kao, H.-M., Lee, C.-H., Lin, C.-L., & Kao, C.-H. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26709815
Ni, Y., Wang, W., Liu, Y., & Jiang, Y. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.24761507
Yeh, J.-J., Liw, P.-X., Wong, Y.-S., Kao, H.-M., Lee, C.-H., Lin, C.-L., & Kao, C.-H. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26709818
Ni, Y., Wang, W., Liu, Y., & Jiang, Y. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.24761903
Novel oral pH-responsive dual-targeted nanogels for precision therapy of colorectal cancer
Wang, L., Bai, J., Chen, X., Liu, H., Shi, J., Peng, W., Weng, J., Zhi, W., & Wang, J. (2026) · Journal of Materials Chemistry B · doi:10.1039/d5tb02238j
Advantages of targeted nanomedicine in cancer treatment
Misra, S. K., & Pathak, K. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-44579-8.00008-4
Metadata
- Authors
- AbouAitah, K., Hassan, H. A., Swiderska-Sroda, A., Gohar, L., Shaker, O. G., Wojnarowicz, J., Opalinska, A., Smalc-Koziorowska, J., Gierlotka, S., & Lojkowski, W.
- Affiliations
- Institute of High Pressure Physics (PL)
- National Research Centre (EG)
- Laboratory of Nanostructures, Institute of High Pressure Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Sokolowska 29/37, 01-142 Warsaw, Poland
- Cairo University (EG)
- Laboratory of Semiconductor Characterization, Institute of High Pressure Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Sokolowska 29/37, 01-142 Warsaw, Poland
- Corresponding author
- AbouAitah, Khaled
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cancers
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-01-07
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 144
- ISSN
- 2072-6694 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7017376
- OpenAlex
- W3000634096
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 102
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9
- FWCI
- 3.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cancers (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Research Centre (NRC, Egypt) (Internal funding)
- National Center for Research and Development, Poland (STRATEGMED3/306888/3/ NCBR/2017, project iTE, Poland)
- European Regional Development Fund within the Operational Programme “Innovative Economy” (CePT project, reference: POIG.02.02.00-14-024/08)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Keywords
- colchicine, mesoporous silica nanoparticles, targeted drug delivery, colon cancer, antimitotic agents, folic acid, phosphonate functionalization, HCT116 cells, apoptosis, MALAT1, microRNA-205, angiopoietin-2, PD-1, cancer immunotherapy, cytotoxicity reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review