Cited by 50Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and healthGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Multi-strain probiotic mixture affects brain morphology and resting state brain function in healthy subjects: an RCT

Open access
Rode, Julia, Edebol Carlman, Hanna M. T., König, Julia, Hutchinson, Ashley N., Thunberg, Per, Persson, Jonas, Brummer, Robert J.·2022·Cells

Abstract

Probiotics can alter brain function via the gut–brain axis. We investigated the effect of a probiotic mixture containing Bifidobacterium longum, Lactobacillus helveticus and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum. In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded crossover design, 22 healthy subjects (6 m/16 f; 24.2 ± 3.4 years) underwent four-week intervention periods with probiotics and placebo, separated by a four-week washout period. Voxel-based morphometry indicated that the probiotic intervention affected the gray matter volume of a cluster covering the left supramarginal gyrus and superior parietal lobule (p < 0.0001), two regions that were also among those with an altered resting state functional connectivity. Probiotic intervention resulted in significant (FDR < 0.05) functional connectivity changes between regions within the default mode, salience, frontoparietal as well as the language network and several regions located outside these networks. Psychological symptoms trended towards improvement after probiotic intervention, i.e., the total score of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (p = 0.056) and its depression sub-score (p = 0.093), as well as sleep patterns (p = 0.058). The probiotic intervention evoked distinct changes in brain morphology and resting state brain function alongside slight improvements of psycho(bio)logical markers of the gut–brain axis. The combination of those parameters may provide new insights into the modes of action by which gut microbiota can affect gut–brain communication and hence brain function.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/cells11182922

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies have identified compositional and functional changes in the intestine and brain, along with distinct changes in brain morphology, resting-state brain function, brain activity, and functional connectivity in regions known to regulate stress.

    “These studies have identified compositional and functional changes in the intestine and brain, along with distinct changes in brain morphology, resting-state brain function, brain activity and functional connectivity in regions known to regulate stress (472, 473).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rode, J., Edebol Carlman, H. M. T., König, J., Hutchinson, A. N., Thunberg, P., Persson, J., & Brummer, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Örebro University (SE)
  • Nutrition-Gut-Brain Interactions Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, 70182 Örebro, Sweden
Corresponding author
Rode, Julia
Venue
Cells
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-09-19
Volume
11
Issue
18
Pages
2922
ISSN
2073-4409 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4296524790
Cited by
50
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cells (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Global Medical Innovation (20150081)
  • Pfizer Consumer Healthcare (20150081)
  • Swedish Knowledge Foundation (20150081)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
probiotics, gut-brain axis, gray matter volume, resting-state functional connectivity, Bifidobacterium longum, Lactobacillus helveticus, Lactobacillus plantarum, supramarginal gyrus, superior parietal lobule, anxiety and depression, sleep patterns, gut microbiota, brain structure
MeSH terms
Bifidobacterium longum, Brain, Humans, Probiotics, Lactobacillus helveticus, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review