CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 380Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGene expression and cancer classificationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 230 of the 231 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Machine Learning and Integrative Analysis of Biomedical Big Data

Open access
Mirza, Bilal, Wang, Wei, Wang, Jie, Choi, Howard, Chung, Neo Christopher, Ping, Peipei·2019·Genes
DOI 10.3390/genes10020087PMC PMC6410075
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Recent developments in high-throughput technologies have accelerated the accumulation of massive amounts of omics data from multiple sources: genome, epigenome, transcriptome, proteome, metabolome, etc. Traditionally, data from each source (e.g., genome) is analyzed in isolation using statistical and machine learning (ML) methods. Integrative analysis of multi-omics and clinical data is key to new biomedical discoveries and advancements in precision medicine. However, data integration poses new computational challenges as well as exacerbates the ones associated with single-omics studies. Specialized computational approaches are required to effectively and efficiently perform integrative analysis of biomedical data acquired from diverse modalities. In this review, we discuss state-of-the-art ML-based approaches for tackling five specific computational challenges associated with integrative analysis: curse of dimensionality, data heterogeneity, missing data, class imbalance and scalability issues.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/genes10020087

Cites

230 of 230 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Machine learning (ML) with curse of dimensionality. ML-based dimensionality reduction (DR) approaches, for tackling the curse of dimensionality, can be classified into feature extraction (FE) and feature selection (FS). FE methods project data from a high-dimensional space to a lower dimensional space, while FS methods identify a small relevant subset of original features in order to reduce the dimensionality. Principal component analysis (PCA), multi-omics factor analysis (MOFA), multiple co-inertia analysis (MCIA), and joint non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) are some examples of FE methods applied in integrative analysis. These FE approaches assume linear relationships in the dataset. Nonlinear FE methods also exist including t-SNE, autoencoders, representation learning, etc. ML-based FS is broadly divided into filter, wrapper and embedded methods. Filter methods such as maximal-relevance and minimal-redundancy (mRMR), correlation-based FS (FCS), ReliefF and Information Gain are employed as a pre-processing step before training any model, while wrapper methods such as recursive feature elimination-support vector machine (RFE-SVM) and Boruta incorporate a predictive model to judge the importance of features. Embedded methods which include least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), Elastic Net, stability selection, etc., perform feature selection as part of the model building process.
Figure 1 Machine learning (ML) with curse of dimensionality. ML-based dimensionality reduction (DR) approaches, for tackling the curse of dimensionality, can be classified into feature extraction (FE) and feature selection (FS). FE methods project data from a high-dimensional space to a lower dimensional space, while FS methods identify a small relevant subset of original features in order to reduce the dimensionality. Principal component analysis (PCA), multi-omics factor analysis (MOFA), multiple co-inertia analysis (MCIA), and joint non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) are some examples of FE methods applied in integrative analysis. These FE approaches assume linear relationships in the dataset. Nonlinear FE methods also exist including t-SNE, autoencoders, representation learning, etc. ML-based FS is broadly divided into filter, wrapper and embedded methods. Filter methods such as maximal-relevance and minimal-redundancy (mRMR), correlation-based FS (FCS), ReliefF and Information Gain are employed as a pre-processing step before training any model, while wrapper methods such as recursive feature elimination-support vector machine (RFE-SVM) and Boruta incorporate a predictive model to judge the importance of features. Embedded methods which include least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), Elastic Net, stability selection, etc., perform feature selection as part of the model building process.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Machine learning with heterogenous data. ML algorithms can handle heterogenous data in different ways. For naive feature concatenation-based data integration, tree-based methods (e.g., decision trees and random forest), and penalized linear models (e.g., elastic net and LASSO) can be employed. A two-stage elastic net-based approach like TANDEM is useful if data sources with continuous features (e.g., gene expression) dominate the data sources with binary features (e.g., mutation). Multiple kernel learning (MKL), a robust integrative analysis approach with heterogenous data, employs different kernels or similarity functions for data from different sources and fuses them into a global matrix. Bayesian multitask MKL and simpleMKL are notable examples in this category. Network fusion methods such as similarity network fusion (SNF) employ similarity network for each data type and fuse heterogenous networks. PAthway Recognition Algorithm using Data Integration on Genomic Models (PARADIGM) can incorporate different heterogenous data including gene expression, copy number and curated pathways. Network-based Integration of Multi-omics Data (NetICS) integrates multi-omics data on a directed functional interaction network. Heterogenous information networks like HetroMed can handle raw text, numeric, and categorical data in electronic health records (EHRs) for medical diagnosis. Integrative methods including iCluster+, Scluster and mixed variable restricted Boltzmann machine (MV-RBM) first transform data from heterogenous sources into latent sub-space, and then perform clustering on the latent profiles. Deep learning models such as improved Clustering and PageRank (CPR), Deep Neural Network Synergy model with Autoencoders (AuDNNsynergy), multimodal deep belief networks (DBN) and deep neural networks (DNN) have been employed to perform integrative analysis of heterogenous data by learning complex features through data transformations at multiple layers.
Figure 2 Machine learning with heterogenous data. ML algorithms can handle heterogenous data in different ways. For naive feature concatenation-based data integration, tree-based methods (e.g., decision trees and random forest), and penalized linear models (e.g., elastic net and LASSO) can be employed. A two-stage elastic net-based approach like TANDEM is useful if data sources with continuous features (e.g., gene expression) dominate the data sources with binary features (e.g., mutation). Multiple kernel learning (MKL), a robust integrative analysis approach with heterogenous data, employs different kernels or similarity functions for data from different sources and fuses them into a global matrix. Bayesian multitask MKL and simpleMKL are notable examples in this category. Network fusion methods such as similarity network fusion (SNF) employ similarity network for each data type and fuse heterogenous networks. PAthway Recognition Algorithm using Data Integration on Genomic Models (PARADIGM) can incorporate different heterogenous data including gene expression, copy number and curated pathways. Network-based Integration of Multi-omics Data (NetICS) integrates multi-omics data on a directed functional interaction network. Heterogenous information networks like HetroMed can handle raw text, numeric, and categorical data in electronic health records (EHRs) for medical diagnosis. Integrative methods including iCluster+, Scluster and mixed variable restricted Boltzmann machine (MV-RBM) first transform data from heterogenous sources into latent sub-space, and then perform clustering on the latent profiles. Deep learning models such as improved Clustering and PageRank (CPR), Deep Neural Network Synergy model with Autoencoders (AuDNNsynergy), multimodal deep belief networks (DBN) and deep neural networks (DNN) have been employed to perform integrative analysis of heterogenous data by learning complex features through data transformations at multiple layers.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Machine learning with missing data. Conventional single imputation methods for handling missing data include replacement with mean or mode values, hot-deck imputation, regression imputation, k-nearest neighbor, etc. Maximum Likelihood approaches including those based on an expectation-minimization (EM) algorithm and Direct Maximization have attractive statistical properties compared to the conventional methods that often result in biased parameter estimates. Multiple imputation (MI) methods like Markov-chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and multivariate imputation by chained equation (MICE) are also statistically robust, compared to conventional single imputation methods, as they take into account the uncertainty in the imputed values. MI for multiple factor analysis (MI-MFA) tackles the missing data problem in multi-omics analysis by performing MI based on hot-deck imputation. MI for nonlinear analysis can be performed using random forest (RF) and extreme learning machine (ELM). Adaptively-thresholded low-rank approximation (ALRA), singular value decomposition (SVD)-impute and SparRec methods employ matrix factorization for data imputation. In addition, imputation methods based on autoencoder and deep learning like denoising autoencoder-based MI (MIDA), AutoImpute and multilayer autoencoder (AE) have been proposed for high-dimensional datasets with missing data. Recently, integrative imputation methods such as ensemble regression imputation, multi-omics factor analysis (MOFA) and Late Fusion Incomplete Multi-View Clustering (LF-IMVC) are also available.
Figure 3 Machine learning with missing data. Conventional single imputation methods for handling missing data include replacement with mean or mode values, hot-deck imputation, regression imputation, k-nearest neighbor, etc. Maximum Likelihood approaches including those based on an expectation-minimization (EM) algorithm and Direct Maximization have attractive statistical properties compared to the conventional methods that often result in biased parameter estimates. Multiple imputation (MI) methods like Markov-chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and multivariate imputation by chained equation (MICE) are also statistically robust, compared to conventional single imputation methods, as they take into account the uncertainty in the imputed values. MI for multiple factor analysis (MI-MFA) tackles the missing data problem in multi-omics analysis by performing MI based on hot-deck imputation. MI for nonlinear analysis can be performed using random forest (RF) and extreme learning machine (ELM). Adaptively-thresholded low-rank approximation (ALRA), singular value decomposition (SVD)-impute and SparRec methods employ matrix factorization for data imputation. In addition, imputation methods based on autoencoder and deep learning like denoising autoencoder-based MI (MIDA), AutoImpute and multilayer autoencoder (AE) have been proposed for high-dimensional datasets with missing data. Recently, integrative imputation methods such as ensemble regression imputation, multi-omics factor analysis (MOFA) and Late Fusion Incomplete Multi-View Clustering (LF-IMVC) are also available.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Machine learning with class imbalance. Class imbalance learning (CIL) methods are broadly classified into three types: data sampling, cost-sensitive learning and ensemble methods. Data sampling approaches balance the class distribution by either undersampling the majority class (e.g., random under sampling (RUS)), oversampling the minority class (e.g., synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE)), or a combination of both (hybrid). Algorithm modification methods modify the learning algorithm generally by cost-sensitive weighting (e.g., Mnet, unbalance-aware network integration and prediction of protein functions (UNIPred), Spotlite and support vector machine (SVM)_weight). Cost-sensitive learning assigns a higher misclassification cost to minority class samples compared to majority class samples. Ensemble learning approaches like ensemble with weighted majority voting, EasyEnsemble, Balanced Cascade, and ensemble weighted extreme learning machine (WELM) train multiple classifiers, and aggregate their results to get the final output. Many existing integrative methods tackle imbalance by tuning models based on imbalance-aware evaluation measures. For example, data integration analysis for biomarker discovery using latent components (Diablo), super-layered neural network architecture (SNN), fuzzy pattern random forest (FPRF), and weighted majority voting (WMV) employ one or more CIL-specific evaluation measures like F-score, balanced error rate (BER), geometric mean (Gmean), Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), area under precision-recall curve (auPRC), etc., instead of classification accuracy, to account for the bias introduced by imbalance in the dataset.
Figure 4 Machine learning with class imbalance. Class imbalance learning (CIL) methods are broadly classified into three types: data sampling, cost-sensitive learning and ensemble methods. Data sampling approaches balance the class distribution by either undersampling the majority class (e.g., random under sampling (RUS)), oversampling the minority class (e.g., synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE)), or a combination of both (hybrid). Algorithm modification methods modify the learning algorithm generally by cost-sensitive weighting (e.g., Mnet, unbalance-aware network integration and prediction of protein functions (UNIPred), Spotlite and support vector machine (SVM)_weight). Cost-sensitive learning assigns a higher misclassification cost to minority class samples compared to majority class samples. Ensemble learning approaches like ensemble with weighted majority voting, EasyEnsemble, Balanced Cascade, and ensemble weighted extreme learning machine (WELM) train multiple classifiers, and aggregate their results to get the final output. Many existing integrative methods tackle imbalance by tuning models based on imbalance-aware evaluation measures. For example, data integration analysis for biomarker discovery using latent components (Diablo), super-layered neural network architecture (SNN), fuzzy pattern random forest (FPRF), and weighted majority voting (WMV) employ one or more CIL-specific evaluation measures like F-score, balanced error rate (BER), geometric mean (Gmean), Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), area under precision-recall curve (auPRC), etc., instead of classification accuracy, to account for the bias introduced by imbalance in the dataset.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Large-scale machine learning. ML-based integrative analysis can be performed at large-scale by utilizing computationally efficient algorithms proposed for big data, online training algorithms, distributed data processing and computing frameworks, or cloud computing-based solutions. Efficient computational approaches tailored for big data include non-iterative neural networks (e.g., extreme learning machine (ELM) and random vector functional link (RVFL)), scalable multiple kernel learning (MKL) methods (e.g., easyMKL and dual-layer kernel ELM (DKELM)), convex optimization for big data, etc. Online machine learning algorithms including online sequential extreme learning machine (OS-ELM), incremental decremental support vector machine (IDSVM), and online deep learning are attractive for big data applications as they incrementally update the model with small chunks of data, instead of loading entire data in memory and learning all at once. In addition, ML algorithms can now be massively parallelized over a cluster of CPUs or graphics processing units (GPUs) using Spark’s MLlib, Apache Mahout, and Google’s TensorFlow programming frameworks. Cloud computing-based bioinformatics platforms including Galaxy Cloud, MetaboAnalyst, XCMS online, and Omics pipe are useful resources for multi-omics exploratory data analysis (EDA) and ML. Moreover, machine learning-as-a-service is being offered by leading commercial cloud service providers like Amazon, Google, Microsoft and IBM, which can be utilized for implementing ML-based analytical pipelines in large-scale multi-omics studies.
Figure 5 Large-scale machine learning. ML-based integrative analysis can be performed at large-scale by utilizing computationally efficient algorithms proposed for big data, online training algorithms, distributed data processing and computing frameworks, or cloud computing-based solutions. Efficient computational approaches tailored for big data include non-iterative neural networks (e.g., extreme learning machine (ELM) and random vector functional link (RVFL)), scalable multiple kernel learning (MKL) methods (e.g., easyMKL and dual-layer kernel ELM (DKELM)), convex optimization for big data, etc. Online machine learning algorithms including online sequential extreme learning machine (OS-ELM), incremental decremental support vector machine (IDSVM), and online deep learning are attractive for big data applications as they incrementally update the model with small chunks of data, instead of loading entire data in memory and learning all at once. In addition, ML algorithms can now be massively parallelized over a cluster of CPUs or graphics processing units (GPUs) using Spark’s MLlib, Apache Mahout, and Google’s TensorFlow programming frameworks. Cloud computing-based bioinformatics platforms including Galaxy Cloud, MetaboAnalyst, XCMS online, and Omics pipe are useful resources for multi-omics exploratory data analysis (EDA) and ML. Moreover, machine learning-as-a-service is being offered by leading commercial cloud service providers like Amazon, Google, Microsoft and IBM, which can be utilized for implementing ML-based analytical pipelines in large-scale multi-omics studies.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Narvaez-Bandera, I., and Sanchez, F. (2017). Integration of Multi Omics Data for Breast Cancer Subtype Classification. IIE Annual Conference Proceedings, Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE).
  2. Rakotomamonjy, 2008, SimpleMKL, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 9, 2491
  3. Koller, D., and Friedman, N. (2009). Probabilistic Graphical Models: Principles and Techniques, MIT Press.
  4. Tsuyuzaki, K., and Nikaido, I. (arXiv, 2017). Biological Systems as Heterogeneous Information Networks: A Mini-review and Perspectives, arXiv.
  5. Rubin, D.B. (2004). Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys, John Wiley & Sons.
  6. Singh, A., Gautier, B., Shannon, C.P., Rohart, F., Vacher, M., Tebutt, S.J., and Le Cao, K.-A. (2018). DIABLO: From multi-omics assays to biomarker discovery, an integrative approach. bioRxiv.
  7. Song, Y., Westerhuis, J.A., Aben, N., Wessels, L.F., Groenen, P.J., and Smilde, A.K. (arXiv, 2018). Generalized Simultaneous Component Analysis of Binary and Quantitative data, arXiv.
  8. Jaeger, 2003, Adaptive nonlinear system identification with echo state networks, Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Volume 15, 593
  9. Hoi, S.C., Sahoo, D., Lu, J., and Zhao, P. (arXiv, 2018). Online Learning: A Comprehensive Survey, arXiv.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 380

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Mirza, B., Wang, W., Wang, J., Choi, H., Chung, N. C., & Ping, P.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
  • Mirza, Bilal
  • Ping, Peipei
ORCID
Venue
Genes
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-01-28
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
87
ISSN
2073-4425 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3390/genes10020087
PMC
PMC6410075
OpenAlex
W2912411326
Cited by
380
References
231
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 9
FWCI
3.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Genes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R35-HL135772, U54-GM114833)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
multi-omics integration, integrative analysis, machine learning, precision medicine, curse of dimensionality, data heterogeneity, missing data, class imbalance, scalability, omics data, clinical data
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Big Data, Animals, Humans, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review