Cited by 54Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareElectronic Health Records Systems

Sharing Biomedical Data: Strengthening AI Development in Healthcare

Open access
Pereira, Tania, Morgado, Joana, Silva, Francisco, Pelter, Michele M., Dias, Vasco Rosa, Barros, Rita, Freitas, Cláudia, Negrão, Eduardo +8 more·2021·Healthcare

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI)-based solutions have revolutionized our world, using extensive datasets and computational resources to create automatic tools for complex tasks that, until now, have been performed by humans. Massive data is a fundamental aspect of the most powerful AI-based algorithms. However, for AI-based healthcare solutions, there are several socioeconomic, technical/infrastructural, and most importantly, legal restrictions, which limit the large collection and access of biomedical data, especially medical imaging. To overcome this important limitation, several alternative solutions have been suggested, including transfer learning approaches, generation of artificial data, adoption of blockchain technology, and creation of an infrastructure composed of anonymous and abstract data. However, none of these strategies is currently able to completely solve this challenge. The need to build large datasets that can be used to develop healthcare solutions deserves special attention from the scientific community, clinicians, all the healthcare players, engineers, ethicists, legislators, and society in general. This paper offers an overview of the data limitation in medical predictive models; its impact on the development of healthcare solutions; benefits and barriers of sharing data; and finally, suggests future directions to overcome data limitations in the medical field and enable AI to enhance healthcare. This perspective is dedicated to the technical requirements of the learning models, and it explains the limitation that comes from poor and small datasets in the medical domain and the technical options that try or can solve the problem related to the lack of massive healthcare data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/healthcare9070827

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [26]ALLEA EASAC FEAM International Sharing of Personal Health Data for Research The ALLEA, EASAC and FEAM Joint Initiative on Resolving the Barriers of Transferring Public Sector Data Outside the EU/EEA 2021 63 Available online: 10.26356/IHDT (accessed on 3 March 2021) 10.26356/IHDT · DOI
  2. [34]de Herrera A.G.S. Foncubierta-Rodrıguez A. Markonis D. Schaer R. Müller H. Crowdsourcing for medical image classification Proceedings of the Annual Congress SGMI 2014 Volume 2014 Available online: https://hesso.tind.io/record/698 (accessed on 3 May 2021)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pereira, T., Morgado, J., Silva, F., Pelter, M. M., Dias, V. R., Barros, R., Freitas, C., Negrão, E., Flor de Lima, B., Correia da Silva, M., Madureira, A. J., Ramos, I., Hespanhol, V., Costa, J. L., Cunha, A., & Oliveira, H. P.
Affiliations
  • INESC TEC—Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • INESC TEC (PT)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Hospital de São João (PT)
  • CHUSJ—Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de São João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
  • FMUP—Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
  • University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (PT)
Venue
Healthcare
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-06-30
Volume
9
Issue
7
Pages
827
ISSN
2227-9032 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3175382607
Cited by
54
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Healthcare (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (01-0145, COMPETE, POCI-01-0145, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-030263, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-, COMPETE_2020, POCI-01-)
  • European Regional Development Fund (COMPETE, POCI-01, 01-0145, COMPETE2020, POCI-01-0145, POCI-01-0145- FEDER)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
biomedical data sharing, medical imaging data, artificial intelligence in healthcare, data scarcity, data privacy, data access restrictions, synthetic data generation, transfer learning, blockchain, data anonymization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review