Cited by 62Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentDigital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Where to go from here? An exploratory meta-analysis of the most promising approaches to depression prevention programs for children and adolescents

Open access
Hetrick, Sarah, Cox, Georgina, Merry, Sally·2015·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Objective: To examine the overall effect of individual depression prevention programs on future likelihood of depressive disorder and reduction in depressive symptoms. In addition, we have investigated whether Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT), Interpersonal Therapy (IPT) and other therapeutic techniques may modify this effectiveness. Methods: This study is based on and includes the trial data from meta-analyses conducted in the Cochrane systematic review of depression prevention programs for children and adolescents by Merry et al. (2011). All trials were published or unpublished English language randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cluster RCTs of any psychological or educational intervention compared to no intervention to prevent depression in children and adolescents aged 5–19 years. Results: There is some evidence that the therapeutic approach used in prevention programs modifies the overall effect. CBT is the most studied type of intervention for depression prevention, and there is some evidence of its effectiveness in reducing the risk of developing a depressive disorder, particularly in targeted populations. Fewer studies employed IPT, however this approach appears promising. To our knowledge, this is the first study to have explored how differences in the approach taken in the prevention programs modify the overall treatment effects of prevention programs for children and adolescents. Conclusions: More research is needed to identify the specific components of CBT that are most effective or indeed if there are other approaches that are more effective in reducing the risk of future depressive episodes. It is imperative that prevention programs are suitable for large scale roll-out, and that emerging popular modes of delivery, such as online dissemination continue to be rigorously tested.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph120504758

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [19]RevMan Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.0 The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration Copenhagen, Denmark 2008
  2. [55]Shatte A.J. Prevention of depressive symtpoms in adolescents: Issues of dissemination and mechanisms of change Diss. Abstr. Int. Sect. B: Sci. Eng. 1997 57 10.1037/a0017671 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [63]Rose G. The Strategy of Preventive Medicine 1st ed. Oxford University Press Oxford, UK 1992

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hetrick, S., Cox, G., & Merry, S.
Affiliations
  • Orygen (AU)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Hetrick, Sarah
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2015-04-30
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
4758-4795
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105188507
Cited by
62
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
depression prevention, children and adolescents, cognitive behavioral therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy, depressive symptoms, psychological intervention, digital dissemination
MeSH terms
Child Health, Adolescent Health, Adolescent, Behavior Therapy, Child, Child, Preschool, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review