Cited by 236Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Prevention of depressive symptoms in adolescents: A randomized trial of cognitive-behavioral and interpersonal prevention programs.

Horowitz, Jason L., Garber, Judy, Ciesla, Jeffrey A., Young, Jami F., Mufson, Laura·2007·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

This study evaluated the efficacy of 2 programs for preventing depressive symptoms in adolescents. Participants were 380 high school students randomly assigned to a cognitive-behavioral program (CB), an interpersonal psychotherapy-adolescent skills training program (IPT-AST), or a no-intervention control. The interventions involved eight 90-min weekly sessions run in small groups during wellness classes. At postintervention, students in both the CB and IPT-AST groups reported significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms than did those in the no-intervention group, controlling for baseline depression scores; the 2 intervention groups did not differ significantly from each other. The effect sizes, using Cohen's d, for the CB intervention and the IPT-AST intervention were 0.37 and 0.26, respectively. Differences between control and intervention groups were largest for adolescents with high levels of depressive symptoms at baseline. For a high-risk subgroup, defined as having scored in the top 25th percentile on the baseline depression measure, the effect sizes for the CB and the IPT-AST interventions were 0.89 and 0.84, respectively. For the whole sample, sociotropy and achievement orientation moderated the effect of the interventions. Intervention effects were short term and were not maintained at 6-month follow-up.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.75.5.693

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The magnitude of the decrease in depression scores is notable, with individuals moving from the moderate range into the mild range, and a within-group effect size comparable to other adolescent depression prevention trials.

    “The magnitude of the decrease in depression scores is notable, with individuals moving from the moderate range into the mild range, and a within-group effect size that is comparable to other adolescent depression prevention trials.47”
  • Reported means in some trials, even those reporting statistical significance, suggest no clear advantage for the early intervention condition.

    “Reported means in some trials, even those that reported statistical significance, suggest no clear advantage for the early intervention condition (e.g. Horowitz, Garber, Ciesla, Young, & Mufson, 2007; Merry, McDowell, Wild, Bir, & Cunliffe, 2004; Quayle, Dziurawiec, Roberts, Kane, & Ebsworthy, 2001).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horowitz, J. L., Garber, J., Ciesla, J. A., Young, J. F., & Mufson, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2007
Volume
75
Issue
5
Pages
693-706
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2019909110
Cited by
236
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 17
FWCI
17.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • William T. Grant Foundation (961730)
  • Vanderbilt University
  • American Psychological Association
  • Independent Research Scientist Award (K02 MH66249)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32-MH18921, K23 MH071320)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
adolescent depression, cognitive-behavioral intervention, interpersonal psychotherapy, high school students, sociotropy, achievement orientation, high-risk adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Internal-External Control, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Personality Inventory, Psychotherapy, Brief, Psychotherapy, Group, Social Behavior, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review