Cited by 22Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Effectiveness of blended cognitive behavioral therapy versus treatment as usual for depression in routine specialized mental healthcare: E-COMPARED trial in the Netherlands

Open access
Kemmeren, L. L., van Schaik, A., Draisma, S., Kleiboer, A., Riper, H., Smit, J. H.·2023·Cognitive Therapy and Research

Abstract

Abstract Background The general aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of blended Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (bCBT) as compared to Treatment as Usual (TAU) for depression in specialized routine mental healthcare in the Netherlands. We further explored a range of secondary outcome variables, including quality of life, clinical response, remission and reliable improvement, as well as clinical deterioration and potential negative effects of treatment. Methods n = 103 patients with Major Depressive Disorder were recruited as part of the E-COMPARED project, and randomly allocated to bCBT (n = 53) or TAU (n = 50). Measurements took place at baseline, 3-, 6- and 12-months follow-up. Treatment effects were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models for repeated measures. Results Depressive symptoms significantly declined and quality of life significantly improved over time in both bCBT and TAU during 12-months follow-up. No significant interaction effects between treatment group and assessment point were found. Likewise, there were no significant differences between the two treatment groups on secondary outcomes. Patients following bCBT went from severe to mild symptom severity, along with large within-group effects. Conclusion Applying bCBT in routine specialized mental health care seems promising, but is a relatively new form of treatment that is still under development and more research is needed. Clinical Trial Registration Netherlands Trials Register NTR4962. Registered on 5 January 2015.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10608-023-10363-y

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Randomized controlled trials have shown efficacy of blended treatments for depression and anxiety, and a meta-analysis found blended interventions more effective or non-inferior to treatment-as-usual for depression.

    “randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown the efficacy of blended treatments for depression (e.g., Kemmeren et al., 2023) and for anxiety (e.g., Romijn et al., 2021), and a recent meta-analysis has found blended interventions to be more effective or non-inferior to treatment-as-usual for depression (Nunes-Zlotkowski et al., 2024).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kemmeren, L. L., van Schaik, A., Draisma, S., Kleiboer, A., Riper, H., & Smit, J. H.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • Trimbos Institute (NL)
Corresponding author
Kemmeren, L. L.
Venue
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Published
2023-03-24
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
386-398
ISSN
  • 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2819
OpenAlex
W4360825332
Cited by
22
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Seventh Framework Programme (603098-2)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
major depressive disorder, depression treatment, usual care, quality of life, remission, clinical deterioration, treatment effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review