Cited by 54Plant biochemistry and biosynthesisPlant tissue culture and regenerationSesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies

Effect of Sugars on Artemisinin Production in Artemisia annua L.: Transcription and Metabolite Measurements

Open access
Arsenault, Patrick R., Vail, Daniel R., Wobbe, Kristin K., Weathers, Pamela J.·2010·Molecules

Abstract

The biosynthesis of the valuable sesquiterpene anti-malarial, artemisinin, is known to respond to exogenous sugar concentrations. Here young Artemisia annua L. seedlings (strain YU) were used to measure the transcripts of six key genes in artemisinin biosynthesis in response to growth on sucrose, glucose, or fructose. The measured genes are: from the cytosolic arm of terpene biosynthesis, 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGR), farnesyl disphosphate (FPS); from the plastid arm of terpene biosynthesis, 1-deoxyxylulose-5-phosphate synthase (DXS), 1-deoxyxylulouse 5-phosphate reductoisomerase (DXR); from the dedicated artemisinin pathway amorpha-4,11-diene synthase (ADS), and the P450, CYP71AV1 (CYP). Changes in intracellular concentrations of artemisinin (AN) and its precursors, dihydroartemisinic acid (DHAA), artemisinic acid (AA), and arteannuin B (AB) were also measured in response to these three sugars. FPS, DXS, DXR, ADS and CYP transcript levels increased after growth in glucose, but not fructose. However, the kinetics of these transcripts over 14 days was very different. AN levels were significantly increased in glucose-fed seedlings, while levels in fructose-fed seedlings were inhibited; in both conditions this response was only observed for 2 days after which AN was undetectable until day 14. In contrast to AN, on day 1 AB levels doubled in seedlings grown in fructose compared to those grown in glucose. Results showed that transcript level was often negatively correlated with the observed metabolite concentrations. When seedlings were gown in increasing levels of AN, some evidence of a feedback mechanism emerged, but mainly in the inhibition of AA production. Together these results show the complex interplay of exogenous sugars on the biosynthesis of artemisinin in young A. annua seedlings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/molecules15042302

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Feedback inhibition of artemisinin biosynthesis can occur; plants sprayed with artemisinic acid had reduced ADS transcripts.

    “Feedback inhibition of artemisinin biosynthesis can also occur. Plants sprayed with artemisinic acid had reduced ADS transcripts of ADS A. annua (Arsenault et al. 2010).”

    From Enhancing artemisinin content in and delivery from Artemisia annua: a review of alternative, classical, and transgenic approaches (2021) · cites this paper as Arsenault et al. 2010

    The Results and Discussion section (‘Correlation between transcript and metabolite levels’; page unavailable) describes a possible negative correlation between ADS transcripts and artemisinic metabolites, suggesting a feedback mechanism. It does not report plants sprayed with artemisinic acid or a resulting reduction in ADS transcripts; its exogenous-treatment experiment instead added artemisinin to seedling culture medium and measured artemisinic acid levels. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arsenault, P. R., Vail, D. R., Wobbe, K. K., & Weathers, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Worcester Polytechnic Institute (US)
  • Arkansas State University (US)
Corresponding author
Weathers, Pamela J.
Venue
Molecules
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2010-03-30
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
2302-2318
ISSN
1420-3049 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969427904
Cited by
54
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecules (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital WPI (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Arkansas Biosciences Institute
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R15GM069562)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies
Keywords
artemisinin biosynthesis, Artemisia annua, sugar metabolism, glucose, fructose, sucrose, sesquiterpene biosynthesis, terpene synthase genes, CYP71AV1, dihydroartemisinic acid, artemisinic acid, arteannuin B, product inhibition, gene expression, metabolite concentrations, antimalarial compounds
MeSH terms
Antimalarials, Fructose, Glucose, Sucrose, Transcription, Genetic, Artemisia annua, Artemisinins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review