Cited by 554Microbial Metabolites in Food BiotechnologyGut microbiota and healthGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Prebiotic inulin-type fructans induce specific changes in the human gut microbiota

Open access
Vandeputte, Doris, Falony, Gwen, Vieira-Silva, Sara, Wang, Jun, Sailer, Manuela, Theis, Stephan, Verbeke, Kristin, Raes, Jeroen·2017·Gut

Abstract

Objective Contrary to the long-standing prerequisite of inducing selective (ie, bifidogenic) effects, recent findings suggest that prebiotic interventions lead to ecosystem-wide microbiota shifts. Yet, a comprehensive characterisation of this process is still lacking. Here, we apply 16S rDNA microbiota profiling and matching (gas chromatography mass spectrometry) metabolomics to assess the consequences of inulin fermentation both on the composition of the colon bacterial ecosystem and faecal metabolites profiles. Design Faecal samples collected during a double-blind, randomised, cross-over intervention study set up to assess the effect of inulin consumption on stool frequency in healthy adults with mild constipation were analysed. Faecal microbiota composition and metabolite profiles were linked to the study's clinical outcome as well as to quality-of-life measurements recorded. Results While faecal metabolite profiles were not significantly altered by inulin consumption, our analyses did detect a modest effect on global microbiota composition and specific inulin-induced changes in relative abundances of Anaerostipes , Bilophila and Bifidobacterium were identified. The observed decrease in Bilophila abundances following inulin consumption was associated with both softer stools and a favourable change in constipation-specific quality-of-life measures. Conclusions Ecosystem-wide analysis of the effect of a dietary intervention with prebiotic inulin-type fructans on the colon microbiota revealed that this effect is specifically associated with three genera, one of which ( Bilophila ) representing a promising novel target for mechanistic research. Trial registration number NCT02548247.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313271

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A diet high in fermentable carbohydrates can lead to reduced microbial diversity within a faecal sample as a result of decreased transit time and softened stools.

    “For example, contrary to expectations a diet high in fermentable carbohydrates can lead to reduced microbial diversity within a faecal sample as a result of decreased transit time and softened stools [106].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vandeputte, D., Falony, G., Vieira-Silva, S., Wang, J., Sailer, M., Theis, S., Verbeke, K., & Raes, J.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
  • VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology (BE)
  • Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • BENEO-Institute, Obrigheim, Germany
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Raes, Jeroen
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2017-02-17
Volume
66
Issue
11
Pages
1968-1974
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W2588769605
Cited by
554
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 10
FWCI
37.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Gut (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • Vlaamse regering
  • Medical Research Council (MR/M004945/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
inulin-type fructans, prebiotics, gut microbiota, fecal metabolites, constipation, stool frequency, Anaerostipes, Bilophila, Bifidobacterium, quality of life, dietary intervention
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Colon, Constipation, Double-Blind Method, Feces, Female, Humans, Inulin, Male, Biomarkers, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies, Metabolome, Prebiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review