Cited by 36Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationCongenital heart defects research

Laminar fate specification in the cerebral cortex

Open access
Gaspard, Nicolas, Vanderhaeghen, Pierre·2011·F1000 Biology Reports

Abstract

The cerebral cortex is composed of hundreds of different types of neurons, which underlie its ability to perform highly complex neural processes. How this astonishing cell diversity is generated during development constitutes a major challenge in developmental neurosciences, with important implications for neurological diseases. Here we review some recent and exciting advances in this field, from the description of the cellular processes at the origin of cortical neuron diversity, to the dissection of the molecular logic underlying fate selection in cortical neurons.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3410/b3-6

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Germinal layers contain various cortical progenitors including RG in VZ, IP in SZi, and ORG in SZo, and these RG may be diverse.

    “Germinal layers contain various cortical progenitors including RG in the VZ, intermediate progenitors (IP) in the SZi, and ORG in the SZo (reviewed in41), and these RG may be quite diverse42.”

    From Transcriptional landscape of the prenatal human brain (2014) · cites this paper as [41]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gaspard, N., & Vanderhaeghen, P.
Affiliations
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
Corresponding author
Vanderhaeghen, Pierre
Venue
F1000 Biology Reports
Published
2011-03-01
Volume
3
Pages
6-6
ISSN
1757-594X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056885206
Cited by
36
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • F1000 Biology Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Waalse Gewest
  • Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
  • Walloon excellence in life sciences and biotechnology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Congenital heart defects research
Keywords
cortical development, neuronal fate specification, neurogenesis, cortical cell types

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review