Cited by 34Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

From Human Pluripotent Stem Cells to Cortical Circuits

Astick, Marc, Vanderhaeghen, Pierre·2018·Current Topics in Developmental Biology

Abstract

Understanding the development of the human brain in relation with evolution is an important frontier field in developmental biology. In particular, investigating the mechanisms underlying the greatly increased relative size and complexity of the cerebral cortex, the seat of our enhanced cognitive abilities, remains a fascinating yet largely unsolved question. Though many advances in our understanding have been gained from the study of animal models, as well as human genetics and embryology, large gaps remain in our knowledge of the molecular mechanisms that control human cortical development. Interestingly, many aspects of corticogenesis can be recapitulated in vitro from mouse and human embryonic or induced pluripotent stem cells (PSCs), using a variety of experimental systems from 2D models to organoids to xenotransplantation. This has provided the opportunity to study these processes in an accessible and physiologically relevant setting. In this chapter, we will discuss how conserved and divergent features of primate/human corticogenesis can be modeled and studied mechanistically using PSC-based models of corticogenesis. We will also review what has been learned through these approaches about pathological defects of human corticogenesis, from early neurogenesis to late neuronal maturation and connectivity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2018.02.011

Cites

108 of 117 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Xenotransplanted neurons reach much more advanced stages of spine maturation than reported so far in in vitro models of human corticogenesis, using adherent cultures or organoids.

    “The xenotransplanted neurons also reach much more advanced stages of spine maturation than reported so far in in vitro models of human corticogenesis, using adherent cultures or organoids (Astick and Vanderhaeghen, 2018, Di Lullo and Kriegstein, 2017, Lancaster and Knoblich, 2014)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Astick, M., & Vanderhaeghen, P.
Affiliations
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
Corresponding author
Vanderhaeghen, Pierre
Venue
Current Topics in Developmental Biology
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2018
Volume
129
Pages
67-98
ISSN
0070-2153 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2800979286
Cited by
34
References
117
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5
FWCI
4.31
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current topics in developmental biology/Current Topics in Developmental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Waalse Gewest
  • Walloon excellence in life sciences and biotechnology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
cortical development, human brain evolution, human pluripotent stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells, organoids, xenotransplantation, neurogenesis, neuronal maturation, neuronal connectivity, primate brain development
MeSH terms
Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Mammals, Models, Biological, Nerve Net, Organoids, Pluripotent Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review